EPCs for listed buildings?

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

EPCs for listed buildings?

Has anyone heard anything definite to answer on this seemingly ongoing subject? I have seen so many comments, sites, suggested possibles etc, including government sites, that I’m beginning to wonder if anybody even cares!

So many forbidden changes would be required to most listed buildings to make them a C grade that it’s a no-no, but where can I find this categorically stated so it is perfectly valid for all to see?

My letting agents insist they have to have an EPC to let all such properties, and as the minimum grade is E, which is easily achievable, it is no problem, but EPC C would be another matter without major changes which are not permitted. And if we are exempt money is being wasted on unnecessary certification.

Any help would be gratefully received.

Thanks,

Graheme

Editor’s Note: The government’s consultation on Reforms to the Energy Performance of Buildings regime, partial government response says:

“We recognise the concerns raised from the heritage sector about EPC recommendations not being applicable to their dwellings, and will ensure that any PRS MEES regulatory approaches provide sufficient flexibility for properties where certain retrofit might not be suitable, with further detail included in the ‘Improving the energy performance of privately rented homes’ government response.”

More information can be seen here.

The post EPCs for listed buildings? appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: EPCs for listed buildings?

Renters’ Rights Act – What should be top of the list for landlords?

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

Renters’ Rights Act – What should be top of the list for landlords?

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 introduces wide-ranging sweeping reforms to the private rented sector in England, fundamentally changing the legal framework for both landlords and tenants – these aren’t small changes, it’s the biggest set of reform the sector has seen in over 30 years.

Key changes include section 21, more commonly known as ‘no fault’ evictions, being abolished, Assured Shorthold Tenancies becoming periodic tenancies with fixed-term contracts becoming void, and increased oversight by local authorities.

For those falling foul of the new laws, there will be tougher penalties and potentially fines for failure to register and provide accurate information to a new national redress scheme, the landlord database.

Increasing burden for landlords

We have mentioned some of the headlines already, but there are also several other changes coming that will increase the burden for landlords.

• Increased thresholds for ‘fault’ notices – Currently, if a tenant falls within one of the statutory grounds for eviction, for example, rent arrears, or antisocial behaviour, landlords can seek possession under section 8. The Renters’ Rights Act makes this harder by introducing new requirements before courts will grant possession. Perhaps the most significant of these changes, tenants will need to be three months in rent arrears (rather than two) before a landlord can rely on the mandatory rent arrears ground.
• Restriction on rent increases – Landlords will no longer be able to rely on rent increase clauses in tenancy agreements. Instead, they’ll have to rely on a statutory section 13 notice, and not within the first 52 weeks of the tenancy. The notice period will also increase from one month to two. Tenants will continue to have the right to challenge proposed rent increases and any notice at the First-tier Tribunal, which has the power to determine the open market rent. A landlord will also be required to specify a rent amount in adverts for new tenancies and cannot invite or accept offers exceeding these amounts.
• Right to request pets – Tenants may request to keep a pet and landlords must not unreasonably refuse consent except in very limited circumstances. Processes and deadlines for pet requests are set out in the Renters’ Rights Act, and courts may order specific performance against landlords who fail to comply.
• Anti-discrimination measures – Landlords will be prohibited from discriminating against prospective tenants because they either have children living with them or visiting them, or if the tenant claims benefits. Blanket bans and tenancy clauses to this effect are void, saved for very limited exceptions. New financial penalties will be in place for discriminatory practices.

So, with only a few months until the new legislation comes into effect on the 1st of May, what should be top of the list for landlords?

How landlords should prepare

To protect their investments and ensure legal compliance, landlords should prepare for an era of more local authority oversight which will include greater investigatory powers, increased financial penalties (of up to £40,000 in some cases) and new offences for misuse of possession grounds. Some practical next steps include:

• Review and update tenancy agreements – Removal of fixed-terms, bringing rent increase clauses into line with the new statutory provisions, removing outright bans on pet ownership and removing any discriminatory clauses could prevent landlords running into problems in the future
• Serve section 21 notices as soon as possible – Section 21 will be abolished, but this is not anticipated to come into effect before the beginning of May and notices served before this time can be relied upon. Assuming that the landlord wishes to recover vacant possession of the property in the near term and depending upon whether the necessarily formalities have been complied with, landlords should ensure section 21 notices are served correctly before their anticipated abolition date on 1 May. There will be no opportunity to remedy an invalid section 21 notice after this time.
• Familiarise with new offences and penalties – Misuse or reckless reliance on possession grounds, or failure to provide proper documentation, can result in fines up to £40,000, rent repayment orders, and summary convictions
• Understand new database and redress scheme requirements – A landlord should prepare to register themselves and their property details on the private rented sector database and ensure continued compliance. A landlord should also prepare to join a redress scheme
• Prepare for the Decent Homes Standard – While this is not yet required, it is anticipated that the Decent Homes Standard shall be expanded to the private rental sector. This sets out the minimum standards for rented housing and landlords should anticipate upgrades to housing where necessary and seek to address any issues that could impact upon a tenant’s health.

Landlords who use the coming months to prepare, rather than simply watch the clock, will be far better placed to adapt to the changes ahead.

RRA brings more regulation

There’s no denying that the Renters’ Rights Act introduces more regulation and greater scrutiny. But it also opens the door to genuine opportunities.

Clearer rules, more stable tenancies when managed well, growing demand for professionally run properties, and a market reshaped by those willing to raise standards all favour landlords who are ready to engage.

For now, focus on the right priorities at the right time, these actions should help landlords reduce future legal risk and ensure compliance.

Daniel Smith is a senior associate in the dispute resolution team at Gardner Leader, specialising in property disputes. He has been listed in the 2026 Legal 500 rankings as a Recommended lawyer for property litigation.

The post Renters’ Rights Act – What should be top of the list for landlords? appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Renters’ Rights Act – What should be top of the list for landlords?

26) Why reaching your original goal is not always the end of the journey

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

26) Why reaching your original goal is not always the end of the journey

Most landlords begin with a clear objective. It might be a target number of properties, a level of income, or a broader sense of financial independence. The details vary, but the direction is usually well defined . Over time, that goal is pursued steadily, properties are acquired, borrowing is managed and the portfolio grows into something tangible and valuable. Then, often without much ceremony, the original goal is reached.

What happens next is less obvious

Reaching that point should feel like an ending, but in practice, it rarely does. The portfolio continues, the income arrives, the business carries on much as it did before, and there is no clear moment where everything stops and a new phase begins. This can make the transition difficult to recognise.

The shift that is easy to miss

During the years of building a portfolio, decisions are guided by a simple question: How do I get there?

Once the goal has been achieved, that question changes to: What happens now?

It is a different kind of question, and one that does not always have an immediate answer.

Why the original plan does not always carry forward

The strategy that builds a portfolio is not always the same as the one that manages it over the longer term. What made sense during the growth phase may not fully reflect the priorities that exist once the portfolio is established. Time, income, involvement and future planning begin to take on a different level of importance. The assets remain the same, but the role they play can change.

The moment many landlords recognise

For some, this shift is gradual, fFor others, it arrives more clearly. They realise that the portfolio has done exactly what it was meant to do, but the question of what it should do next has never been fully considered. It is not a problem, it is simply the next stage.

Looking at the portfolio with fresh perspective

At this point, the focus moves away from building and towards alignment; not how to grow the portfolio, but how it fits into the wider picture of what comes next. This often involves stepping back and looking at the business as a whole rather than as a collection of individual properties. It is a different way of thinking, and one that is rarely needed earlier in the journey.

A question worth asking

When the original goal has been achieved, one simple question becomes more relevant than any other: What do I want this portfolio to do for me now?

The answer is not always obvious, but it is often where the next set of decisions begins.

An invitation for established landlords

If you have reached the point where your portfolio has achieved what it was originally intended to do, it may be worth taking a step back and considering what comes next.

You are welcome to email a copy of your latest property portfolio spreadsheet to Yvonne@Property118.com.

From there we can arrange a free introductory discussion to explore how your portfolio fits into the next stage of your plans.

/* “function”==typeof InitializeEditor,callIfLoaded:function(o){return!(!gform.domLoaded||!gform.scriptsLoaded||!gform.themeScriptsLoaded&&!gform.isFormEditor()||(gform.isFormEditor()&&console.warn(“The use of gform.initializeOnLoaded() is deprecated in the form editor context and will be removed in Gravity Forms 3.1.”),o(),0))},initializeOnLoaded:function(o){gform.callIfLoaded(o)||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.scriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,()=>{gform.domLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}))},hooks:{action:{},filter:{}},addAction:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“action”,o,r,e,t)},addFilter:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“filter”,o,r,e,t)},doAction:function(o){gform.doHook(“action”,o,arguments)},applyFilters:function(o){return gform.doHook(“filter”,o,arguments)},removeAction:function(o,r){gform.removeHook(“action”,o,r)},removeFilter:function(o,r,e){gform.removeHook(“filter”,o,r,e)},addHook:function(o,r,e,t,n){null==gform.hooks[o][r]&&(gform.hooks[o][r]=[]);var d=gform.hooks[o][r];null==n&&(n=r+”_”+d.length),gform.hooks[o][r].push({tag:n,callable:e,priority:t=null==t?10:t})},doHook:function(r,o,e){var t;if(e=Array.prototype.slice.call(e,1),null!=gform.hooks[r][o]&&((o=gform.hooks[r][o]).sort(function(o,r){return o.priority-r.priority}),o.forEach(function(o){“function”!=typeof(t=o.callable)&&(t=window[t]),”action”==r?t.apply(null,e):e[0]=t.apply(null,e)})),”filter”==r)return e[0]},removeHook:function(o,r,t,n){var e;null!=gform.hooks[o][r]&&(e=(e=gform.hooks[o][r]).filter(function(o,r,e){return!!(null!=n&&n!=o.tag||null!=t&&t!=o.priority)}),gform.hooks[o][r]=e)}});
/* ]]> */

/* = 0;if(!is_postback){return;}var form_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_wrapper_585′);var is_confirmation = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_confirmation_wrapper_585′).length > 0;var is_redirect = contents.indexOf(‘gformRedirect(){‘) >= 0;var is_form = form_content.length > 0 && ! is_redirect && ! is_confirmation;var mt = parseInt(jQuery(‘html’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + parseInt(jQuery(‘body’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + 100;if(is_form){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).html(form_content.html());if(form_content.hasClass(‘gform_validation_error’)){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).addClass(‘gform_validation_error’);} else {jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).removeClass(‘gform_validation_error’);}setTimeout( function() { /* delay the scroll by 50 milliseconds to fix a bug in chrome */ }, 50 );if(window[‘gformInitDatepicker’]) {gformInitDatepicker();}if(window[‘gformInitPriceFields’]) {gformInitPriceFields();}var current_page = jQuery(‘#gform_source_page_number_585′).val();gformInitSpinner( 585, ‘https://www.property118.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/images/spinner.svg’, true );jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_page_loaded’, [585, current_page]);window[‘gf_submitting_585′] = false;}else if(!is_redirect){var confirmation_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘.GF_AJAX_POSTBACK’).html();if(!confirmation_content){confirmation_content = contents;}jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).replaceWith(confirmation_content);jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_confirmation_loaded’, [585]);window[‘gf_submitting_585′] = false;wp.a11y.speak(jQuery(‘#gform_confirmation_message_585′).text());}else{jQuery(‘#gform_585′).append(contents);if(window[‘gformRedirect’]) {gformRedirect();}}jQuery(document).trigger(“gform_pre_post_render”, [{ formId: “585”, currentPage: “current_page”, abort: function() { this.preventDefault(); } }]); if (event && event.defaultPrevented) { return; } const gformWrapperDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_wrapper_585″ ); if ( gformWrapperDiv ) { const visibilitySpan = document.createElement( “span” ); visibilitySpan.id = “gform_visibility_test_585″; gformWrapperDiv.insertAdjacentElement( “afterend”, visibilitySpan ); } const visibilityTestDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_visibility_test_585″ ); let postRenderFired = false; function triggerPostRender() { if ( postRenderFired ) { return; } postRenderFired = true; gform.core.triggerPostRenderEvents( 585, current_page ); if ( visibilityTestDiv ) { visibilityTestDiv.parentNode.removeChild( visibilityTestDiv ); } } function debounce( func, wait, immediate ) { var timeout; return function() { var context = this, args = arguments; var later = function() { timeout = null; if ( !immediate ) func.apply( context, args ); }; var callNow = immediate && !timeout; clearTimeout( timeout ); timeout = setTimeout( later, wait ); if ( callNow ) func.apply( context, args ); }; } const debouncedTriggerPostRender = debounce( function() { triggerPostRender(); }, 200 ); if ( visibilityTestDiv && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent === null ) { const observer = new MutationObserver( ( mutations ) => { mutations.forEach( ( mutation ) => { if ( mutation.type === ‘attributes’ && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent !== null ) { debouncedTriggerPostRender(); observer.disconnect(); } }); }); observer.observe( document.body, { attributes: true, childList: false, subtree: true, attributeFilter: [ ‘style’, ‘class’ ], }); } else { triggerPostRender(); } } );} );
/* ]]> */

The post 26) Why reaching your original goal is not always the end of the journey appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: 26) Why reaching your original goal is not always the end of the journey

The £200,000 diagnosis: why timing matters in inheritance tax planning

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

The £200,000 diagnosis: why timing matters in inheritance tax planning

The post The £200,000 diagnosis: why timing matters in inheritance tax planning appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: The £200,000 diagnosis: why timing matters in inheritance tax planning

Examining Shelter’s statistical framing

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

Examining Shelter’s statistical framing

Statistics can change how an entire sector is perceived.

A single number repeated often enough can shape public policy, influence legislation and define how millions of landlords are viewed.

Shelter understands this better than most organisations operating in the housing debate.

Headlines citing Shelter research frequently appear in national newspapers:

“45% of renters face illegal acts.”

“Evictions surge.”

“Millions of tenants at risk.”

But what happens when you look behind those headlines and examine the underlying data?

This was precisely the kind of question that interested David Knox. He believed statistics should always be read with the same discipline as financial accounts.

When you apply that discipline, the picture becomes more complicated than the headlines suggest.

Case study: the “45% illegal actions” claim

Shelter has previously cited polling suggesting that 45% of private renters have experienced illegal actions by landlords.

On its face, that figure is alarming.

However, survey-based polling differs fundamentally from enforcement statistics or representative national datasets such as the English Housing Survey.

Polling samples often:

• Capture self-reported experiences.
• Include a broad definition of “illegal action”.
• Reflect respondent interpretation rather than legal adjudication.

The term “illegal action” may include:

• Failure to protect a deposit correctly.
• Administrative breaches.
• Harassment allegations.
• Misunderstood tenancy procedures.

The public hearing “45%” may assume widespread criminal conduct.

The underlying dataset may reflect a wider spectrum of compliance issues, some technical, some disputed, some historic.

Without contextual comparison to:

• Total number of tenancies.
• Local authority enforcement statistics.
• Court findings.

The headline percentage alone creates a distorted picture.

David Knox’s consistent approach was to ask: what is the base number? What is the definition? What is the comparator?

Those questions apply here.

Section 21 and the arithmetic of growth

Another recurring example is eviction reporting.

Shelter press releases frequently highlight percentage increases in Section 21 notices or possession claims.

An increase of 20% sounds dramatic, however, percentage increases do not reveal:

• Whether volumes remain below pre-pandemic levels.
• Whether the rise reflects court backlog normalisation.
• Whether economic conditions temporarily distort the figures.

For example, if possession claims rise from 10,000 to 12,000, that is a 20% increase. It is also 2,000 additional cases in a rental market comprising millions of tenancies.

Both statements are true.

Only one dominates headlines.

The omission of denominator context

When percentages are used without reference to total market size, the scale of risk can appear disproportionate.

The private rented sector in England contains millions of households.

If a statistic references thousands of cases, the percentage relative to the total sector often appears small.

If the same statistic is expressed as year-on-year percentage growth, it appears urgent.

Neither framing is inherently false.

The choice of framing shapes narrative.

That narrative influences legislation.

Historical pattern

This pattern is not new.

Earlier Property118 articles challenged Shelter’s presentation of “rogue landlord complaint” increases where headline growth rates were emphasised without immediate disclosure of base figures.

Similarly, NRLA open letters have responded to Shelter press releases by adding omitted Ministry of Justice context.

This is not a dispute about data existence.

It is a dispute about emphasis.

David Knox’s concern was always that selective emphasis can influence public debate disproportionately to the underlying scale.

Media amplification

Once a percentage appears in a press release, it is frequently reproduced without methodological caveat.

Headlines compress nuance.

“Half of renters face illegal treatment”

“Evictions surge by 25%”

Such language becomes part of the political atmosphere in which housing reform is debated.

By the time policymakers cite the statistic, the original survey design or enforcement context is rarely discussed.

The figure has taken on symbolic weight.

Why this matters

Shelter plays a significant role in shaping housing reform.

Its data and polling inform public opinion and parliamentary debate.

If headline statistics are framed in a way that magnifies relative change while minimising denominator context, that framing carries legislative consequence.

Landlords are regulated not only by statute, but by narrative.

A narrative built on incomplete context can produce disproportionate response.

That does not require deliberate distortion. It requires only selective emphasis.

The discipline David applied

When David Knox FCA analysed Shelter’s accounts, he did not accuse. He reconstructed.

The same discipline should apply to statistical claims.

For any headline percentage, three questions should follow:

1. What is the base number?
2. What is the denominator?
3. What is the historical comparator?

If those are not immediately visible, interpretation becomes vulnerable to exaggeration.

Moving from statistics to structure

In the final article in this series, we will step back from individual numbers and consider a broader question: what role does Shelter occupy within the housing ecosystem?

Is it primarily:

• An advice charity?
• A campaigning organisation?
• A policy influencer?
• A publicly funded contractor?

That structural identity shapes how both financial figures and statistical claims should be interpreted.

About David Knox FCA

David Knox FCA, who wrote for Property118 under the pseudonym “Appalled Landlord”, passed away on 21 January 2020. His investigative work, including his scrutiny of Shelter’s published accounts, remains available in the Property118 archive. This series revisits the same type of publicly available source material in the analytical spirit of his work. A tribute to David can be read here.

The post Examining Shelter’s statistical framing appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Examining Shelter’s statistical framing

24) The risks that don’t show up on a spreadsheet

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

24) The risks that don’t show up on a spreadsheet

Most landlords understand the numbers in their portfolio very well. They track values, borrowing, LTV, rental income and costs. Over time, those figures become familiar and reassuring. The portfolio can be measured, reviewed and compared year after year. From a financial perspective, very little is hidden, but not all risks are visible in those numbers.

What spreadsheets are good at showing

A well-maintained property schedule gives a clear picture of performance. It shows how the portfolio is growing, how it is financed and how it is performing on a day-to-day basis. It allows landlords to make informed decisions and to monitor progress over time. That visibility is one of the strengths of property as an investment, because it creates a sense of control.

What spreadsheets don’t tend to show

There are other aspects of a portfolio that are harder to quantify.

• How decisions are made.
• How responsibilities are shared.
• How easily the business could adapt if circumstances changed.

These are not reflected in property values or rental figures, yet they can influence how the portfolio performs over time.

The role of familiarity

Long-established portfolios often feel straightforward to manage. The properties are known, the processes are familiar, the way decisions are made has developed naturally over many years. That familiarity can be helpful, but it can also mean that certain aspects of the portfolio are rarely questioned, not because they are problematic, but because they have always been that way.

When the unseen becomes relevant

Most of the time, these less visible factors sit quietly in the background. The portfolio performs as expected and there is no reason to examine them closely. They tend to become more relevant when something changes: a refinancing decision, a change in personal circumstances, or a need to adjust income or involvement. At that point, what was previously unseen can become more noticeable.

The difference between strength and resilience

A portfolio can appear strong in financial terms while still being relatively untested in other ways.

Strength is often measured through assets and income.

Resilience is reflected in how the portfolio responds to change.

The two are related, but not identical.

A question worth considering

This is not about identifying problems; it’s about understanding the portfolio more fully: If something needed to change, how easily could your portfolio adapt?

For many landlords, this is not a question that has ever needed to be answered directly, it simply has not arisen.

An invitation for established landlords

If you have built a substantial portfolio and have only ever viewed it through the lens of financial performance, it may be worth taking a broader perspective.

You are welcome to email a copy of your latest property portfolio spreadsheet to Yvonne@Property118.com.

From there we can arrange a free introductory discussion to explore how your portfolio functions beyond the numbers and what that might mean for the years ahead.

/* “function”==typeof InitializeEditor,callIfLoaded:function(o){return!(!gform.domLoaded||!gform.scriptsLoaded||!gform.themeScriptsLoaded&&!gform.isFormEditor()||(gform.isFormEditor()&&console.warn(“The use of gform.initializeOnLoaded() is deprecated in the form editor context and will be removed in Gravity Forms 3.1.”),o(),0))},initializeOnLoaded:function(o){gform.callIfLoaded(o)||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.scriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,()=>{gform.domLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}))},hooks:{action:{},filter:{}},addAction:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“action”,o,r,e,t)},addFilter:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“filter”,o,r,e,t)},doAction:function(o){gform.doHook(“action”,o,arguments)},applyFilters:function(o){return gform.doHook(“filter”,o,arguments)},removeAction:function(o,r){gform.removeHook(“action”,o,r)},removeFilter:function(o,r,e){gform.removeHook(“filter”,o,r,e)},addHook:function(o,r,e,t,n){null==gform.hooks[o][r]&&(gform.hooks[o][r]=[]);var d=gform.hooks[o][r];null==n&&(n=r+”_”+d.length),gform.hooks[o][r].push({tag:n,callable:e,priority:t=null==t?10:t})},doHook:function(r,o,e){var t;if(e=Array.prototype.slice.call(e,1),null!=gform.hooks[r][o]&&((o=gform.hooks[r][o]).sort(function(o,r){return o.priority-r.priority}),o.forEach(function(o){“function”!=typeof(t=o.callable)&&(t=window[t]),”action”==r?t.apply(null,e):e[0]=t.apply(null,e)})),”filter”==r)return e[0]},removeHook:function(o,r,t,n){var e;null!=gform.hooks[o][r]&&(e=(e=gform.hooks[o][r]).filter(function(o,r,e){return!!(null!=n&&n!=o.tag||null!=t&&t!=o.priority)}),gform.hooks[o][r]=e)}});
/* ]]> */

/* = 0;if(!is_postback){return;}var form_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_wrapper_585′);var is_confirmation = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_confirmation_wrapper_585′).length > 0;var is_redirect = contents.indexOf(‘gformRedirect(){‘) >= 0;var is_form = form_content.length > 0 && ! is_redirect && ! is_confirmation;var mt = parseInt(jQuery(‘html’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + parseInt(jQuery(‘body’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + 100;if(is_form){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).html(form_content.html());if(form_content.hasClass(‘gform_validation_error’)){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).addClass(‘gform_validation_error’);} else {jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).removeClass(‘gform_validation_error’);}setTimeout( function() { /* delay the scroll by 50 milliseconds to fix a bug in chrome */ }, 50 );if(window[‘gformInitDatepicker’]) {gformInitDatepicker();}if(window[‘gformInitPriceFields’]) {gformInitPriceFields();}var current_page = jQuery(‘#gform_source_page_number_585′).val();gformInitSpinner( 585, ‘https://www.property118.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/images/spinner.svg’, true );jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_page_loaded’, [585, current_page]);window[‘gf_submitting_585′] = false;}else if(!is_redirect){var confirmation_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘.GF_AJAX_POSTBACK’).html();if(!confirmation_content){confirmation_content = contents;}jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).replaceWith(confirmation_content);jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_confirmation_loaded’, [585]);window[‘gf_submitting_585′] = false;wp.a11y.speak(jQuery(‘#gform_confirmation_message_585′).text());}else{jQuery(‘#gform_585′).append(contents);if(window[‘gformRedirect’]) {gformRedirect();}}jQuery(document).trigger(“gform_pre_post_render”, [{ formId: “585”, currentPage: “current_page”, abort: function() { this.preventDefault(); } }]); if (event && event.defaultPrevented) { return; } const gformWrapperDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_wrapper_585″ ); if ( gformWrapperDiv ) { const visibilitySpan = document.createElement( “span” ); visibilitySpan.id = “gform_visibility_test_585″; gformWrapperDiv.insertAdjacentElement( “afterend”, visibilitySpan ); } const visibilityTestDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_visibility_test_585″ ); let postRenderFired = false; function triggerPostRender() { if ( postRenderFired ) { return; } postRenderFired = true; gform.core.triggerPostRenderEvents( 585, current_page ); if ( visibilityTestDiv ) { visibilityTestDiv.parentNode.removeChild( visibilityTestDiv ); } } function debounce( func, wait, immediate ) { var timeout; return function() { var context = this, args = arguments; var later = function() { timeout = null; if ( !immediate ) func.apply( context, args ); }; var callNow = immediate && !timeout; clearTimeout( timeout ); timeout = setTimeout( later, wait ); if ( callNow ) func.apply( context, args ); }; } const debouncedTriggerPostRender = debounce( function() { triggerPostRender(); }, 200 ); if ( visibilityTestDiv && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent === null ) { const observer = new MutationObserver( ( mutations ) => { mutations.forEach( ( mutation ) => { if ( mutation.type === ‘attributes’ && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent !== null ) { debouncedTriggerPostRender(); observer.disconnect(); } }); }); observer.observe( document.body, { attributes: true, childList: false, subtree: true, attributeFilter: [ ‘style’, ‘class’ ], }); } else { triggerPostRender(); } } );} );
/* ]]> */

The post 24) The risks that don’t show up on a spreadsheet appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: 24) The risks that don’t show up on a spreadsheet

Government publishes information on new tenancy agreements

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

Government publishes information on new tenancy agreements

The government has confirmed what information must be included in new tenancy agreements for the Renters’ Rights Act.

Landlords will need to give this information when creating a new tenancy on or after 1 May 2026.

It’s important for landlords to know that you will not need to provide this information to an existing tenant if the tenancy was signed before 1 May 2026.

Instead, landlords will need to give tenants a copy of the Renters’ Rights Act information sheet, or they could face a £7,000 fine.

Permission from letting agent to include contact details

If landlords are using a new tenancy agreement after 1 May 2026, they must include certain information such as:

• Your name (or the name of the landlord, if you are a letting agent or property manager acting on a landlord’s behalf) and the name of any joint landlords you let the property with.
• A postal address in England or Wales where the tenant can send legal notices to you, for example a notice to end the tenancy. This does not need to be your home address, but it must be an address where you can receive post. This could include a business address.

The government explain that landlords do not have to provide an email address or phone number, but they can choose to do so if they would like the tenant to be able to contact them.

The government say this could be helpful if you would like tenants to report repairs by phone or email.

Landlords can also choose to include the contact details of a property manager or letting agent, if they have one, but they are not required to do so.

However, the government point out that landlords must ensure they have permission from the letting agent to include their contact details.

Name and address

Other information that must be included in tenancy agreements include:

• Tenant(s) name – Landlords must include the names of all tenants, including joint tenants.
• Property address – Landlords must include the address of the property where the tenant will live.
• Tenancy start date – Landlords must include the date the tenant is first entitled to possession of the property. This means the first day when they are allowed to move into the property.
• Rent amount and when it is due – must include the amount of rent and when payment is due.
• Rent increases – Landlords must include a statement that if you make a new proposal to increase the rent, you will serve a notice on your tenant in accordance with Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

Explain which bills are covered

If the rent amount includes bills, then landlords must explain which bills are covered.

The government explains landlords do not need to say how much of the rent covers the cost of bills, but landlords can choose to include this if they wish.

Landlords may decide to ask tenants to make separate payments to them or someone else connected to them for the purpose of paying bills. If they do this, landlords must explain:

• What bills any separate payment will cover
• How much is due for each bill — or an explanation of how and when the tenant will be told this information
• When each bill payment is due — or an explanation of how and when the tenant will be told this information

Landlords only need to give tenants this information for certain bills. These are:

• Council tax
• Utilities, including electricity, gas or other fuel, water, and sewage
• A TV licence
• Communications services, including telephone, internet, cable TV and satellite TV
• Energy efficiency improvements under a green deal plan

Landlords only need to give this information for bills that are covered by the rent or which tenants must pay to them separately. Landlords do not need to explain which bills the tenant is responsible for arranging or paying directly to the supplier.

Important exception

Landlords must include the amount of the tenancy deposit, if they have taken one or plan to take one from their tenant.

The government explain: “Rules on tenancy deposits mean landlords must give specific information to tenants within 30 days of receiving the money. For example, this includes which government-approved scheme the deposit is or will be protected in.

“This information does not have to be provided at the same time as the other tenancy information listed, but it can be if landlords wish to do so.”

Landlords must also include the minimum amount of notice a tenant must give when serving notice to end the tenancy, as well as information about landlords ending a tenancy, such as through an order for possession.

However, the government have clarified an important exception: “The only circumstance where a landlord would not need to obtain an order for possession is where the Secretary of State has given written notice that the occupier is disqualified from occupying premises under a residential tenancy agreement because of their immigration status.

“In this circumstance, the landlord should instead serve the occupier with a notice to end the tenancy under the relevant immigration legislation.”

Right to request a pet

Under the Renters’ Rights Act, tenants will be able to request a pet, which landlords cannot unreasonably refuse. The government say a statement confirming this must be included in new tenancy agreements.

Other required information includes a statement that the landlord must ensure the property is fit for human habitation and details of the landlord’s obligations under Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The government also says that if there is only a verbal tenancy agreement (even if it began before 1 May 2026), landlords will still need to provide this information.

A full list of everything that needs to be included can be viewed by clicking here.

The post Government publishes information on new tenancy agreements appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Government publishes information on new tenancy agreements

Why Property118 is NOT currently recommending s162 incorporation to landlords with mortgages

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

Why Property118 is NOT currently recommending s162 incorporation to landlords with mortgages

In February 2026, Property118 took HMRC to the First Tier Tribunal (Tax).

The hearing went on for 10 days.

We took this action because, since late 2023, HMRC has argued that the use of an indemnity for existing mortgage liabilities to be taken over by a company is a discloseable tax avoidance scheme. This is despite their own published guidance and concessions stating that this is what normally happens.

The above is NOT new; the HMRC guidance has retained this form for over 50-years!

HMRC has also recently taken the currently unpublished view (discovered via an FOI request) that if a company takes on new mortgage liabilities and uses those funds to redeem existing mortgage liabilities, such funds could be treated as taxable consideration under CGT rules.

The above is more plausible, in our opinion, and also according to established and highly redarded industry textbook guidance published by Lexis Nexis, which says as follows …

Established practice?

There could be a very strong established practice argument against this too. This is on the basis that HMRC has been unable to produce any evidence of having previously declined relief based their own consession (ESC/D32), even where the company took on new borrowing to repay liabilities which existed prior to incorporation.

Nevertheless, landlords who are considering any form of s162 incorporation, especially if they have mortgages or any other form of liabilities secured against their rental properties, should, in our opinion, defer their decisions to incorporate using s162 relief until absolute clarity is obtained in law. The mentally stressful and emotionally draining aspects of appealing an HMRC ruling cannot be underestimated, never mind the costs, which can easily run into six figures to pay for the necessary legal support.

Also consider that it took us nearly two years to get HMRC in front of the First-tier Tribunal. That is despite Property118 having always recommended what we regarded as the safer option, which was to follow HMRC’s own published guidance and to heed the risk warnings in Simon’s Taxes.

The above is intended to serve as a warning not only to landlords, but also to accountants, solicitors, barristers, mortgage brokers, lenders and financial advisers.

Tribunal outcome

We expect the First-tier tribunal to make a ruling later this year, but the losing side could then appeal to the Upper Tribunal and beyond, resulting in the wait for much need clarity potentially being pushed back even further. Meanwhile, these matters continue to frustrate landlords who would like to incorporate their businesses for the reasons explained in HMRC’s GAAR Guidance Part D paragraph 2.2, as follows …

A conversation worth having?

If you are weighing up your own strategy, whether that’s to sell, expand, or restructure to improve profitibility, it is worth having a discussion with a Property118 consultant to take a closer look at how your portfolio is structured as a whole now, and to forecast the outcomes based on multiple scenario’s.

These conversations are typically most useful for landlords with established portfolios and relatively modest borrowing who are beginning to reflect on how their assets could work more effectively in the years ahead.

/* “function”==typeof InitializeEditor,callIfLoaded:function(o){return!(!gform.domLoaded||!gform.scriptsLoaded||!gform.themeScriptsLoaded&&!gform.isFormEditor()||(gform.isFormEditor()&&console.warn(“The use of gform.initializeOnLoaded() is deprecated in the form editor context and will be removed in Gravity Forms 3.1.”),o(),0))},initializeOnLoaded:function(o){gform.callIfLoaded(o)||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.scriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,()=>{gform.domLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}))},hooks:{action:{},filter:{}},addAction:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“action”,o,r,e,t)},addFilter:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“filter”,o,r,e,t)},doAction:function(o){gform.doHook(“action”,o,arguments)},applyFilters:function(o){return gform.doHook(“filter”,o,arguments)},removeAction:function(o,r){gform.removeHook(“action”,o,r)},removeFilter:function(o,r,e){gform.removeHook(“filter”,o,r,e)},addHook:function(o,r,e,t,n){null==gform.hooks[o][r]&&(gform.hooks[o][r]=[]);var d=gform.hooks[o][r];null==n&&(n=r+”_”+d.length),gform.hooks[o][r].push({tag:n,callable:e,priority:t=null==t?10:t})},doHook:function(r,o,e){var t;if(e=Array.prototype.slice.call(e,1),null!=gform.hooks[r][o]&&((o=gform.hooks[r][o]).sort(function(o,r){return o.priority-r.priority}),o.forEach(function(o){“function”!=typeof(t=o.callable)&&(t=window[t]),”action”==r?t.apply(null,e):e[0]=t.apply(null,e)})),”filter”==r)return e[0]},removeHook:function(o,r,t,n){var e;null!=gform.hooks[o][r]&&(e=(e=gform.hooks[o][r]).filter(function(o,r,e){return!!(null!=n&&n!=o.tag||null!=t&&t!=o.priority)}),gform.hooks[o][r]=e)}});
/* ]]> */

/* = 0;if(!is_postback){return;}var form_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_wrapper_585′);var is_confirmation = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_confirmation_wrapper_585′).length > 0;var is_redirect = contents.indexOf(‘gformRedirect(){‘) >= 0;var is_form = form_content.length > 0 && ! is_redirect && ! is_confirmation;var mt = parseInt(jQuery(‘html’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + parseInt(jQuery(‘body’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + 100;if(is_form){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).html(form_content.html());if(form_content.hasClass(‘gform_validation_error’)){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).addClass(‘gform_validation_error’);} else {jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).removeClass(‘gform_validation_error’);}setTimeout( function() { /* delay the scroll by 50 milliseconds to fix a bug in chrome */ }, 50 );if(window[‘gformInitDatepicker’]) {gformInitDatepicker();}if(window[‘gformInitPriceFields’]) {gformInitPriceFields();}var current_page = jQuery(‘#gform_source_page_number_585′).val();gformInitSpinner( 585, ‘https://www.property118.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/images/spinner.svg’, true );jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_page_loaded’, [585, current_page]);window[‘gf_submitting_585′] = false;}else if(!is_redirect){var confirmation_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘.GF_AJAX_POSTBACK’).html();if(!confirmation_content){confirmation_content = contents;}jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).replaceWith(confirmation_content);jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_confirmation_loaded’, [585]);window[‘gf_submitting_585′] = false;wp.a11y.speak(jQuery(‘#gform_confirmation_message_585′).text());}else{jQuery(‘#gform_585′).append(contents);if(window[‘gformRedirect’]) {gformRedirect();}}jQuery(document).trigger(“gform_pre_post_render”, [{ formId: “585”, currentPage: “current_page”, abort: function() { this.preventDefault(); } }]); if (event && event.defaultPrevented) { return; } const gformWrapperDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_wrapper_585″ ); if ( gformWrapperDiv ) { const visibilitySpan = document.createElement( “span” ); visibilitySpan.id = “gform_visibility_test_585″; gformWrapperDiv.insertAdjacentElement( “afterend”, visibilitySpan ); } const visibilityTestDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_visibility_test_585″ ); let postRenderFired = false; function triggerPostRender() { if ( postRenderFired ) { return; } postRenderFired = true; gform.core.triggerPostRenderEvents( 585, current_page ); if ( visibilityTestDiv ) { visibilityTestDiv.parentNode.removeChild( visibilityTestDiv ); } } function debounce( func, wait, immediate ) { var timeout; return function() { var context = this, args = arguments; var later = function() { timeout = null; if ( !immediate ) func.apply( context, args ); }; var callNow = immediate && !timeout; clearTimeout( timeout ); timeout = setTimeout( later, wait ); if ( callNow ) func.apply( context, args ); }; } const debouncedTriggerPostRender = debounce( function() { triggerPostRender(); }, 200 ); if ( visibilityTestDiv && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent === null ) { const observer = new MutationObserver( ( mutations ) => { mutations.forEach( ( mutation ) => { if ( mutation.type === ‘attributes’ && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent !== null ) { debouncedTriggerPostRender(); observer.disconnect(); } }); }); observer.observe( document.body, { attributes: true, childList: false, subtree: true, attributeFilter: [ ‘style’, ‘class’ ], }); } else { triggerPostRender(); } } );} );
/* ]]> */

The post Why Property118 is NOT currently recommending s162 incorporation to landlords with mortgages appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Why Property118 is NOT currently recommending s162 incorporation to landlords with mortgages

Tenants urged to check homes are licensed

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

Tenants urged to check homes are licensed

More than half of the estimated 9,000 PRS homes in Blackpool’s latest selective licensing area have now been registered, with landlords who haven’t done so facing the prospect of fines or prosecution.

The scheme, covering eight wards, has been in place for almost a year.

It requires a £772 licence and, so far, 30% of licensed properties meet the higher Blackpool Standard for property management which comes with a discount.

Now, the council is urging tenants to ask whether their home is licensed, and whether it meets the higher management standard.

The Blackpool Standard

The council’s cabinet member for community safety, Cllr Paula Burdess, said: “People deserve better housing. There are clear links between poor quality private rented accommodation and deprivation.

“While we know that a great many landlords in our town provide a decent standard of housing for residents, as evidenced in the hundreds of homes which meet our high Blackpool Standard.

“But there are still many people living in poor housing.”

She added: “Tenants can ask their landlords if their home has been licensed, and if it meets the higher Blackpool Standard.

“By working together, we can improve homes, neighbourhoods and outcomes for all.”

EPC rating discount

Elsewhere, half of landlords secured a fee reduction by having an EPC rating of C or above.

In the licensing areas, landlords must meet conditions covering property standards, tenancy management, fire safety and action on anti-social behaviour.

Discounted fees are also available for homes meeting the Blackpool Standard or achieving an EPC rating of C or higher.

The Blackpool Standard requires landlords to provide documentation such as repair procedures and anti-social behaviour policies.

The post Tenants urged to check homes are licensed appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Tenants urged to check homes are licensed

23) When every decision in your portfolio still depends on you

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

23) When every decision in your portfolio still depends on you

There is a stage many landlords reach where the portfolio feels settled. The properties are familiar, the tenants are in place, the income arrives with reasonable consistency. From the outside, it looks like a business that largely runs itself. Look a little closer, and a different picture often emerges; every meaningful decision still depends on you.

How this happens

Most portfolios are built personally. You chose the properties, ou arranged the finance, you handled the early challenges and made the key decisions that shaped the direction of the business. That involvement does not disappear as the portfolio matures. It simply becomes less visible. The result is a business that appears stable, but is still highly reliant on one person to keep it that way.

The hidden workload

It is not usually the obvious tasks that create this reliance. Day-to-day management can often be delegated, letting agents, accountants and advisers all play their part. The dependency sits elsewhere: refinancing decisions, property sales or acquisitions, handling unexpected issues, and balancing income against longer-term plans. These are the moments where the responsibility returns to you.

The question few landlords test

Because everything is working, there is rarely a reason to challenge this arrangement. The portfolio performs, decisions are made when needed, the business continues to function, which makes it easy to leave one question unexplored: What would happen if you stepped back from those decisions?

Control can feel like strength

Being closely involved in every important decision often feels like a strength, after all, no one understands the portfolio better than you do. The results achieved so far are a direct reflection of that involvement and there is a degree of reassurance in knowing that nothing significant happens without your input. However, at the same time, that level of control can quietly shape how the portfolio operates.

When reliance becomes more noticeable

This dynamic tends to become more relevant over time, not because anything has gone wrong, but because the role the portfolio plays begins to change. Decisions start to carry different weight and time becomes more valuable. The question of how the business would function without constant input becomes more meaningful. For some landlords, this is not a concern, but for others, it is simply something they have never examined closely.

A different way of looking at the same portfolio

None of this suggests that the portfolio is flawed, it reflects how it has been built and managed over many years. The interesting point is that the same set of assets can sometimes be viewed differently when the focus shifts from performance to dependency, not what the portfolio produces, but how it functions.

An invitation for established landlords

If you have built a substantial portfolio and recognise that many of the key decisions still depend on you, it may be worth taking a step back and looking at the bigger picture.

/* “function”==typeof InitializeEditor,callIfLoaded:function(o){return!(!gform.domLoaded||!gform.scriptsLoaded||!gform.themeScriptsLoaded&&!gform.isFormEditor()||(gform.isFormEditor()&&console.warn(“The use of gform.initializeOnLoaded() is deprecated in the form editor context and will be removed in Gravity Forms 3.1.”),o(),0))},initializeOnLoaded:function(o){gform.callIfLoaded(o)||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.scriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,()=>{gform.domLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}))},hooks:{action:{},filter:{}},addAction:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“action”,o,r,e,t)},addFilter:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“filter”,o,r,e,t)},doAction:function(o){gform.doHook(“action”,o,arguments)},applyFilters:function(o){return gform.doHook(“filter”,o,arguments)},removeAction:function(o,r){gform.removeHook(“action”,o,r)},removeFilter:function(o,r,e){gform.removeHook(“filter”,o,r,e)},addHook:function(o,r,e,t,n){null==gform.hooks[o][r]&&(gform.hooks[o][r]=[]);var d=gform.hooks[o][r];null==n&&(n=r+”_”+d.length),gform.hooks[o][r].push({tag:n,callable:e,priority:t=null==t?10:t})},doHook:function(r,o,e){var t;if(e=Array.prototype.slice.call(e,1),null!=gform.hooks[r][o]&&((o=gform.hooks[r][o]).sort(function(o,r){return o.priority-r.priority}),o.forEach(function(o){“function”!=typeof(t=o.callable)&&(t=window[t]),”action”==r?t.apply(null,e):e[0]=t.apply(null,e)})),”filter”==r)return e[0]},removeHook:function(o,r,t,n){var e;null!=gform.hooks[o][r]&&(e=(e=gform.hooks[o][r]).filter(function(o,r,e){return!!(null!=n&&n!=o.tag||null!=t&&t!=o.priority)}),gform.hooks[o][r]=e)}});
/* ]]> */

/* = 0;if(!is_postback){return;}var form_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_wrapper_585′);var is_confirmation = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_confirmation_wrapper_585′).length > 0;var is_redirect = contents.indexOf(‘gformRedirect(){‘) >= 0;var is_form = form_content.length > 0 && ! is_redirect && ! is_confirmation;var mt = parseInt(jQuery(‘html’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + parseInt(jQuery(‘body’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + 100;if(is_form){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).html(form_content.html());if(form_content.hasClass(‘gform_validation_error’)){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).addClass(‘gform_validation_error’);} else {jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).removeClass(‘gform_validation_error’);}setTimeout( function() { /* delay the scroll by 50 milliseconds to fix a bug in chrome */ }, 50 );if(window[‘gformInitDatepicker’]) {gformInitDatepicker();}if(window[‘gformInitPriceFields’]) {gformInitPriceFields();}var current_page = jQuery(‘#gform_source_page_number_585′).val();gformInitSpinner( 585, ‘https://www.property118.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/images/spinner.svg’, true );jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_page_loaded’, [585, current_page]);window[‘gf_submitting_585′] = false;}else if(!is_redirect){var confirmation_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘.GF_AJAX_POSTBACK’).html();if(!confirmation_content){confirmation_content = contents;}jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).replaceWith(confirmation_content);jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_confirmation_loaded’, [585]);window[‘gf_submitting_585′] = false;wp.a11y.speak(jQuery(‘#gform_confirmation_message_585′).text());}else{jQuery(‘#gform_585′).append(contents);if(window[‘gformRedirect’]) {gformRedirect();}}jQuery(document).trigger(“gform_pre_post_render”, [{ formId: “585”, currentPage: “current_page”, abort: function() { this.preventDefault(); } }]); if (event && event.defaultPrevented) { return; } const gformWrapperDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_wrapper_585″ ); if ( gformWrapperDiv ) { const visibilitySpan = document.createElement( “span” ); visibilitySpan.id = “gform_visibility_test_585″; gformWrapperDiv.insertAdjacentElement( “afterend”, visibilitySpan ); } const visibilityTestDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_visibility_test_585″ ); let postRenderFired = false; function triggerPostRender() { if ( postRenderFired ) { return; } postRenderFired = true; gform.core.triggerPostRenderEvents( 585, current_page ); if ( visibilityTestDiv ) { visibilityTestDiv.parentNode.removeChild( visibilityTestDiv ); } } function debounce( func, wait, immediate ) { var timeout; return function() { var context = this, args = arguments; var later = function() { timeout = null; if ( !immediate ) func.apply( context, args ); }; var callNow = immediate && !timeout; clearTimeout( timeout ); timeout = setTimeout( later, wait ); if ( callNow ) func.apply( context, args ); }; } const debouncedTriggerPostRender = debounce( function() { triggerPostRender(); }, 200 ); if ( visibilityTestDiv && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent === null ) { const observer = new MutationObserver( ( mutations ) => { mutations.forEach( ( mutation ) => { if ( mutation.type === ‘attributes’ && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent !== null ) { debouncedTriggerPostRender(); observer.disconnect(); } }); }); observer.observe( document.body, { attributes: true, childList: false, subtree: true, attributeFilter: [ ‘style’, ‘class’ ], }); } else { triggerPostRender(); } } );} );
/* ]]> */

The post 23) When every decision in your portfolio still depends on you appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: 23) When every decision in your portfolio still depends on you