Browsing all articles in Uncategorized
Mar
4

Problem tenants can actually help you sell faster: how changing the narrative can get the highest prices for your properties

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Problem tenants can actually help you sell faster: how changing the narrative can get the highest prices for your properties

We’ve all been there, most landlords think a “difficult” tenant kills a sale. But in reality, handled correctly, they can help drive the price up.

Amidst the noise, the regulation changes, the red tape and the headlines predicting doom and gloom, landlords across the North West are still selling. And not only selling, but selling quickly, at strong prices, with complete certainty.

Right now, despite the Renters’ Right Act creeping in, we’re seeing buy-to-let properties and portfolios sit stagnant on the market for months with unrealistic asking prices. Why? Landlords are holding out for yesterday’s market. Others are paralysed by compliance worries, damp reports, and in the worst cases: tenants.

Meanwhile, for the 80 landlords per week coming to us to sell, they’re exiting cleanly and profitably.

At Landlord Sales Agency, we specialise exclusively in helping motivated landlords sell, particularly those with freehold houses across the North West, where demand remains strong and buyer appetite is rising.

Unlike traditional agents who inflate asking prices to win your instruction, we position properties strategically to draw serious buyers in. Lower, intelligent pricing creates urgency. Urgency creates multiple offers. Multiple offers create bidding wars, and bidding wars push prices up. What’s more, we move fast. Super fast. All our properties sell on average in under 28 days.

But what if you have tenants who won’t allow access? Perhaps you have tenants that are determined to stay, or feel anxious about viewings?

Recently, a landlord approached us with properties to sell in St Helens, and one in particular looked, on paper, impossible. The tenants were determined to remain in situ and initially refused access for viewings. Many landlords would have backed away or entered into conflict, many estate agents or auctions would be up against it, bracing for the process to take months.

But at Landlord Sales Agency, we know exactly how to deal with tenants. In fact, getting them to come on side is one of the things we do best.

Through careful communication and our team of experts who specialise in conflict resolution, we discovered the tenants had already identified a potential buyer two doors down who’d be interested in keeping them on. That vital piece of information, from getting the tenants to open up, was the catalyst to the sale.

We jumped on it straight away, welcoming the potential buyer into the property. But it wasn’t straightforward. At first, the tenants wouldn’t let anyone else in for viewings whilst they had this buyer lined up, but we knew how to make them feel at ease, allowing access and in turn pushing the price up by letting other buyers compete in a bidding war. The result was a huge success. The property sold to the buyer the tenants wanted, at the price the landlord wanted, and everyone was happy.

This isn’t just a one-off. We do this time and time again. And we’re the best in the UK to do it. No other company is getting tenants to work with them in the way we’re doing it. At Landlord Sales Agency, we’re working alongside tenants to not only get properties sold, but to leverage their local connections to get the properties sold for a price even higher than expected.

It’s why finding the right company to sell your properties matters more than anything else. And we’re the ones delivering.

Whilst landlords still need to be realistic on price – we typically achieve between 85 and 90% market value – our results significantly outperform auctions or estate agents while still delivering speed and certainty. It’s no coincidence that’s linked to a strategically lower listing price. And because we manage everything, from compliance updates to identifying what truly needs refurbs or repairing and what doesn’t, landlords avoid wasting money and go straight to the sale.

Money in the bank. No fuss. No hassle. No fees. No problem.

So if you have properties situated in the North West that are freehold houses around the £200k mark, with or without tenants, we’re ready to sell them.

There’s still a strong window of opportunity in this market, but the time to act is now.

/* “function”==typeof InitializeEditor,callIfLoaded:function(o){return!(!gform.domLoaded||!gform.scriptsLoaded||!gform.themeScriptsLoaded&&!gform.isFormEditor()||(gform.isFormEditor()&&console.warn(“The use of gform.initializeOnLoaded() is deprecated in the form editor context and will be removed in Gravity Forms 3.1.”),o(),0))},initializeOnLoaded:function(o){gform.callIfLoaded(o)||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.scriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,()=>{gform.domLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}))},hooks:{action:{},filter:{}},addAction:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“action”,o,r,e,t)},addFilter:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“filter”,o,r,e,t)},doAction:function(o){gform.doHook(“action”,o,arguments)},applyFilters:function(o){return gform.doHook(“filter”,o,arguments)},removeAction:function(o,r){gform.removeHook(“action”,o,r)},removeFilter:function(o,r,e){gform.removeHook(“filter”,o,r,e)},addHook:function(o,r,e,t,n){null==gform.hooks[o][r]&&(gform.hooks[o][r]=[]);var d=gform.hooks[o][r];null==n&&(n=r+”_”+d.length),gform.hooks[o][r].push({tag:n,callable:e,priority:t=null==t?10:t})},doHook:function(r,o,e){var t;if(e=Array.prototype.slice.call(e,1),null!=gform.hooks[r][o]&&((o=gform.hooks[r][o]).sort(function(o,r){return o.priority-r.priority}),o.forEach(function(o){“function”!=typeof(t=o.callable)&&(t=window[t]),”action”==r?t.apply(null,e):e[0]=t.apply(null,e)})),”filter”==r)return e[0]},removeHook:function(o,r,t,n){var e;null!=gform.hooks[o][r]&&(e=(e=gform.hooks[o][r]).filter(function(o,r,e){return!!(null!=n&&n!=o.tag||null!=t&&t!=o.priority)}),gform.hooks[o][r]=e)}});
/* ]]> */

Contact Landlord Sales Agency




document.getElementById( “ak_js_1″ ).setAttribute( “value”, ( new Date() ).getTime() );

/* = 0;if(!is_postback){return;}var form_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_wrapper_515′);var is_confirmation = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_confirmation_wrapper_515′).length > 0;var is_redirect = contents.indexOf(‘gformRedirect(){‘) >= 0;var is_form = form_content.length > 0 && ! is_redirect && ! is_confirmation;var mt = parseInt(jQuery(‘html’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + parseInt(jQuery(‘body’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + 100;if(is_form){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_515′).html(form_content.html());if(form_content.hasClass(‘gform_validation_error’)){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_515′).addClass(‘gform_validation_error’);} else {jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_515′).removeClass(‘gform_validation_error’);}setTimeout( function() { /* delay the scroll by 50 milliseconds to fix a bug in chrome */ }, 50 );if(window[‘gformInitDatepicker’]) {gformInitDatepicker();}if(window[‘gformInitPriceFields’]) {gformInitPriceFields();}var current_page = jQuery(‘#gform_source_page_number_515′).val();gformInitSpinner( 515, ‘https://www.property118.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/images/spinner.svg’, true );jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_page_loaded’, [515, current_page]);window[‘gf_submitting_515′] = false;}else if(!is_redirect){var confirmation_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘.GF_AJAX_POSTBACK’).html();if(!confirmation_content){confirmation_content = contents;}jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_515′).replaceWith(confirmation_content);jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_confirmation_loaded’, [515]);window[‘gf_submitting_515′] = false;wp.a11y.speak(jQuery(‘#gform_confirmation_message_515′).text());}else{jQuery(‘#gform_515′).append(contents);if(window[‘gformRedirect’]) {gformRedirect();}}jQuery(document).trigger(“gform_pre_post_render”, [{ formId: “515”, currentPage: “current_page”, abort: function() { this.preventDefault(); } }]); if (event && event.defaultPrevented) { return; } const gformWrapperDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_wrapper_515″ ); if ( gformWrapperDiv ) { const visibilitySpan = document.createElement( “span” ); visibilitySpan.id = “gform_visibility_test_515″; gformWrapperDiv.insertAdjacentElement( “afterend”, visibilitySpan ); } const visibilityTestDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_visibility_test_515″ ); let postRenderFired = false; function triggerPostRender() { if ( postRenderFired ) { return; } postRenderFired = true; gform.core.triggerPostRenderEvents( 515, current_page ); if ( visibilityTestDiv ) { visibilityTestDiv.parentNode.removeChild( visibilityTestDiv ); } } function debounce( func, wait, immediate ) { var timeout; return function() { var context = this, args = arguments; var later = function() { timeout = null; if ( !immediate ) func.apply( context, args ); }; var callNow = immediate && !timeout; clearTimeout( timeout ); timeout = setTimeout( later, wait ); if ( callNow ) func.apply( context, args ); }; } const debouncedTriggerPostRender = debounce( function() { triggerPostRender(); }, 200 ); if ( visibilityTestDiv && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent === null ) { const observer = new MutationObserver( ( mutations ) => { mutations.forEach( ( mutation ) => { if ( mutation.type === ‘attributes’ && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent !== null ) { debouncedTriggerPostRender(); observer.disconnect(); } }); }); observer.observe( document.body, { attributes: true, childList: false, subtree: true, attributeFilter: [ ‘style’, ‘class’ ], }); } else { triggerPostRender(); } } );} );
/* ]]> */

The post Problem tenants can actually help you sell faster: how changing the narrative can get the highest prices for your properties appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Problem tenants can actually help you sell faster: how changing the narrative can get the highest prices for your properties

Mar
4

Limited company landlords hold three times more properties

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Limited company landlords hold three times more properties

Landlords using limited companies now control portfolios that are more than three times larger than those holding rented property in their own name, research reveals.

According to Pegasus Insight, this highlights a widening structural split across the private rented sector.

The data shows that 21% of landlords operate at least part of their portfolio through a limited company.

The firm’s latest Landlord Trends report indicates that incorporation has edged upward rather than accelerating sharply.

Limited company landlords hold an average of 15.9 properties, while individual landlords, by comparison, manage 4.9 on average.

Incorporated landlord portfolios

The firm’s founder and chief executive, Mark Long, said: “This isn’t about a sudden surge into incorporation, but about a steady structural divergence.

“Limited company landlords are operating at a different scale, with different funding models and different levels of engagement in the market.

“They tend to run larger, more leveraged and often more complex portfolios, which naturally creates a different risk profile and a different set of support needs.”

He added: “For lenders and policymakers, this is important, as it shows the PRS is no longer a single, uniform market.

“Ownership structure is becoming an increasingly important lens through which to understand landlord behaviour, resilience and even future supply.”

Rely on BTL finance

The research also shows that finance arrangements differ too with 69% of incorporated landlords are relying on buy to let mortgage borrowing.

For landlords holding personal assets, the ratio is 57%.

Also, 35% of limited company landlords own at least one House in Multiple Occupation, compared with 17% among individual landlords.

Work full or part-time

The firm has also found that among landlords operating through companies, 27% identify as full- or part-time.

For landlords holding property in their own name, the figure is 14%.

When it comes to setting rents, three quarters of limited company landlords increased rents in the past year, compared with 61% of individual landlords.

The post Limited company landlords hold three times more properties appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Limited company landlords hold three times more properties

Mar
4

After 30 Years in Property, One Strategy Still Leads for Cashflow

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

After 30 Years in Property, One Strategy Still Leads for Cashflow

Over three decades of investing have taught Simon Zutshi one clear lesson. If your goal is strong, consistent monthly income, not all strategies are equal.

Buy-to-lets can work. Flips can create chunks of cash. But when it comes to reliable cashflow, HMOs continue to stand out.

As the founder of property investors network, Simon has seen Houses of Multiple Occupation transform investors’ results when structured correctly

Why HMOs Can Be So Powerful

A standard rental property produces one stream of income.

An HMO produces several.

Multiple tenants under one roof means multiple rent payments. When sourced carefully, set up compliantly and managed professionally, this can significantly increase monthly cashflow compared to traditional single lets

For some investors, that uplift in income has meant replacing their employed earnings far sooner than expected

So Why Doesn’t Everyone Do Them?

Because most investors assume HMOs are too complicated

Licensing.
Planning.
Multiple tenants.
Management systems.

Yes, HMOs are more advanced.

But advanced does not mean impossible. It means structured.

With the right guidance, the process becomes clear. You understand the rules, the numbers and the risks before you commit. And you decide whether this strategy genuinely fits your goals.

Free 3 Part HMO Series

Rather than dismissing HMOs based on assumptions, Simon has created a free three-part video series explaining:

  • Why HMOs can generate strong cashflow
  • Why most investors avoid them
  • How they can be funded, including approaches many overlook
  • And how to decide if this strategy is right for you

The training is practical, direct and based on 30 years of real-world experience.

It is completely free to access.

If you are serious about building income from property in 2026 and beyond, this is an opportunity to properly understand one of the most powerful cashflow strategies available.

Do not rule it out without looking at it properly.

Register now and watch the free HMO video series before access closes.

The post After 30 Years in Property, One Strategy Still Leads for Cashflow appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: After 30 Years in Property, One Strategy Still Leads for Cashflow

Mar
3

Why are comparable housing markets moving in opposite directions on rental policy?

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Why are comparable housing markets moving in opposite directions on rental policy?

Across Europe, governments facing similar housing pressures are making markedly different choices about how to regulate and tax private rental supply. Some are tightening fiscal treatment and strengthening regulatory controls. Others are recalibrating incentives to retain or attract private rental investment.

The divergence is no longer subtle. It is structural, and it is becoming impossible to ignore.

Property118 has spent more than a decade reporting on the commercial and regulatory realities shaping the UK private rented sector. Increasingly, the most revealing signals are not confined to Westminster. They are emerging across comparable economies wrestling with the same underlying question, how do you sustain rental supply under political pressure?

Why this matters to Property118 readers

Most UK debate is insular. It assumes that tighter rules and higher costs are simply the price of better standards, and that supply will adapt automatically.

Property118 does not accept that supply is automatic. Rental homes exist because individuals and institutions make commercial decisions over time. Policy changes alter risk, returns and confidence, and the supply response is often gradual rather than dramatic.

Property118 readers understand this instinctively because you experience it through refinancing constraints, compliance burdens, and the constant recalibration of risk. What is changing is that other countries are reaching different conclusions about how to keep supply functioning.

Ireland recalibrates

Ireland has faced acute rental shortages and rising political scrutiny over housing affordability. Like the UK, it introduced restrictions on the deductibility of finance costs for landlords. Unlike the UK, it later moved to reverse course.

Property118 reported on Ireland’s decision to recalibrate its approach to finance cost restrictions, signalling concern that the earlier framework risked discouraging supply.

Read: Ireland reversing finance cost restrictions for landlords

The most important question is not whether Ireland’s decision is “right policy”. It is why the political calculus shifted. What evidence convinced policymakers that recalibration was necessary? Which supply indicators were considered? Did landlord participation measurably change before and after reform?

This is where Property118 believes the UK debate is weakest. We talk about outcomes, rising rents, declining availability and affordability pressures, but we rarely investigate the decision drivers in real time.

Read: Joseph Rowntree Foundation report, PRS lessons from Ireland, landlords’ perspective

Portugal moves in a different direction

Portugal has taken a different approach again. Facing rental pressure in urban centres, it proposed a 10% tax regime designed explicitly to attract or retain private rental investment under defined conditions. This represents a conscious attempt to use fiscal policy as a supply lever.

Read: Portugal cuts rental tax to 10%, a warning shot for the UK?

Portugal’s housing market differs structurally from the UK and Ireland. Its legal framework, tenure patterns and ownership culture are not identical. Yet the underlying pressure is familiar, insufficient rental supply relative to demand.

The strategic difference lies in response. Portugal appears willing to deploy incentives. The UK, by contrast, has tightened fiscal treatment and expanded regulatory expectations.

The UK trajectory and the Section 24 fault line

The UK has implemented a series of tax and regulatory reforms affecting private landlords, including the restriction of mortgage interest relief. The stated objectives have included fairness, fiscal alignment and improved standards.

Property118 has covered Section 24 in depth, including the long-term commercial and behavioural consequences that flow from changing the treatment of finance costs.

Read: Section 24 comprehensive report
Read: Section 24 tax reforms

The core question is not whether reform was justified. It is whether supply impact was fully modelled, whether consequences were anticipated, and whether measurable outcomes align with policy intent.

When comparable countries facing similar housing strain reach different conclusions about how to treat private rental investment, that divergence deserves structured scrutiny. Property118 intends to push this conversation beyond assumption and into evidence.

A pattern of policy U-turns abroad

Property118 has previously reported on policy reversals overseas and the warnings those reversals should raise for the UK. In several jurisdictions, policy tightened, participation weakened, and governments later faced pressure to recalibrate.

Read: anti-landlord policy U-turns abroad spark warnings for the UK

This is not about praising one country and criticising another. It is about recognising that housing policy has consequences, and those consequences often arrive before official statistics catch up.

Property118 readers do not need persuading that incentives and constraints change behaviour. The investigation is about identifying which political and fiscal drivers lead to divergence, and whether the supply response is measurable.

From Property118 commentary to structured investigation

Property118 has historically focused on UK developments and, where relevant, highlighted international contrasts. The emerging pattern of divergence now warrants deeper examination.

Accordingly, Property118 is exploring a cross-border investigative framework focused on:

  • Comparative fiscal treatment of private rental income and finance costs
  • Regulatory tightening versus incentive recalibration
  • Measurable landlord participation trends and supply intentions
  • Refinancing conditions and credit availability as a supply constraint
  • Political drivers influencing policy direction and narrative framing
  • Supply outcomes over time, not just short-term headlines

This is not about advocating one model over another. It is about understanding why divergence exists and whether outcomes differ in ways that inform future debate.

For Property118, the aim is straightforward. Better explanation, better evidence, and better journalism that can be stress-tested across jurisdictions rather than argued in a domestic echo chamber.

An invitation to collaborate with Property118

The private rented sector is shaped by decisions made by landlords, lenders, investors and policymakers. Those decisions do not stop at borders, and neither should serious housing journalism.

Property118 is therefore inviting journalists, researchers and policy analysts working in Ireland, Portugal and other European jurisdictions to connect with us if you are examining similar supply questions. Cross-border collaboration can illuminate patterns that national reporting alone cannot fully capture.

Property118 will continue reporting on domestic developments. Property118 will also increasingly look outward, because divergence across comparable markets is telling us something the UK debate is currently missing.

The divergence is real. The outcomes may shape housing policy for years to come. Property118 intends to investigate it properly.

The post Why are comparable housing markets moving in opposite directions on rental policy? appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Why are comparable housing markets moving in opposite directions on rental policy?

Mar
3

Landlord Law is Changing: What You Must Do Before 1st May 2026

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Landlord Law is Changing: What You Must Do Before 1st May 2026

Over the past few months, I have been speaking to landlords across the UK about the Renters Rights Act, which comes into force on 1st May 2026.

Most know it is happening. Many assume it is simply another regulatory adjustment to add to the long list of changes landlords have already navigated.

It is not.

This legislation reshapes the balance between landlord and tenant in a way that directly affects how you manage property, protect income and handle risk. It is less about headlines and more about how the detail plays out when something goes wrong.

In my work, I deal with those moments. Failed possession claims. Invalid notices. Escalating disputes. Rent Repayment Orders that could have been avoided.

Under the new Act, certain breaches may result in a Rent Repayment Order of up to 24 months’ rent. On a property generating £1,200 per month, that is £28,800.

In many cases, the issue will not stem from deliberate noncompliance. It will come from misunderstanding a procedural change. Relying on an outdated assumption. Believing an old rule still applies.

That is where the real financial risk sits.

From 1st May 2026, this legislation becomes enforceable. At that point, it is no longer about what you think applies. It is about whether your processes, documentation and portfolio structure align with the new legal position.

Why I Am Running This Webinar

This is precisely why I am hosting a live session titled:

Landlord Law Is Changing: What You Must Do Before 1st May 2026

This will not be theory or commentary on media headlines. It will be a practical breakdown of what is changing, where landlords are genuinely exposed, and what you should be reviewing now within your own portfolio.

We will look at:

  • How the changes affect possession and enforcement
  • Where Rent Repayment Order risk sits
  • What assumptions may no longer be safe
  • The practical steps to take before 1st May 2026

If you are serious about protecting your rental income and staying ahead of enforcement, this is time well spent.

You can register by clicking HERE

Once enforcement begins, correcting a mistake is always more expensive than preventing one.

The post Landlord Law is Changing: What You Must Do Before 1st May 2026 appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Landlord Law is Changing: What You Must Do Before 1st May 2026

Mar
3

Court digitalisation will improve access to justice claims government

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Court digitalisation will improve access to justice claims government

The government claim they will spend more than £50 million to digitise the county courts to handle the court backlog.

Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary David Lammy spoke following a report by Sir Brian Leveson, who warned the justice system is in crisis.

The news comes as Landlord Action figures reveal that landlords are facing the longest court waiting times in 20 years.

Improve access to justice

Mr Lammy claimed the government is committed to structural reform of the court system and will help drive investment in the court system by investing more than £50 million to progress digitalisation of the court system

He said: “This investment is not just about big business. The investment is designed to improve access to justice by cutting complexity and cost, and making it easier to resolve common everyday civil problems, such as when a business is failing to pay a supplier for goods provided or a dispute between a landlord and tenant over the condition of a property.

“Over a million claims have now been issued on our existing digital services for making money claims and damages claims. Cases consistently progress three times quicker through their early stages using these modern, user-focused services.

“The government is working with the Online Procedure Rule Committee, to develop rules for online proceedings that are simple to use, accessible and fair, fit for the digital age.”

Government has not provided clarity

The government have previously claimed a digitised court system will help landlords. However, as previously reported by Property118, the National Residential Landlords (NRLA) has warned the government has not provided clarity on how the courts will be prepared for the digital possession process.

Ben Beadle, chief executive of the NRLA, said: “At Report Stage of the Renters’ Rights Act, the Housing Minister told the Commons that: “Court readiness is essential to the successful operation of the new system”. We agree with the Minister.

“However, the government has yet to define what it means by the courts being “ready”. Without that clarity, it is unclear what the planned digitisation of possession cases is intended to deliver or how success will be measured.

“More broadly, whilst the Master of the Rolls has indicated that the “first iteration” of the new digital platform to process possession cases is expected to be released in late Spring 2026, it remains unclear what this will look and feel like in practice for tenants and landlords, or the extent to which it will speed up the processing of legitimate possession claims.”

Figures by the Ministry of Justice reveal it took courts an average of more than eight months to process and enforce landlord claims last year.

The post Court digitalisation will improve access to justice claims government appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Court digitalisation will improve access to justice claims government

Mar
3

UK rents dip in February – led by London falls

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

UK rents dip in February – led by London falls

Landlords are seeing rents level off as tenants take longer to commit and affordability pressures shape new deals, HomeLet says.

Its latest rental index shows average UK rents fell to £1,301 in February, a 0.1% month-on-month fall from £1,302 in January.

That leaves rents 2% higher than a year earlier, when the average stood at £1,275.

While the change is marginal, it interrupts a run of monthly rent rises.

Properties take longer to rent

The firm’s head of partnerships, Carrie Alliston, said: “We’re currently seeing a rental market that’s slowing in a different way; not through falling rents, but through properties taking longer to let.

“The average proportion of income spent on rent (30.9%) has only gone up by 0.1% since November last year, which shows that tenants are being more cautious about what they can afford and how sustainable higher rents really are.”

She added: “As we move closer to the Renters’ Rights Act, this shift in behaviour underlines the importance of prioritising suitability and stability over simply pushing for the highest possible rent.”

London rents continue falling

Outside London, HomeLet says rents increased by £2 over the past month to £1,120.

That’s a 0.02% rise since January and places rents 1.8% above their level in February last year.

In the capital, however, rents fell for a fourth consecutive month to £2,067.

That is 0.5% lower than January and 2% higher than 12 months ago.

Six regions recorded a decline compared with January, while six posted an increase, highlighting varied local conditions rather than a single national trend.

Northern Ireland’s rents are up 0.4% month-on-month and 5.1% annually; Scotland’s rents grew by 0.6% and 4.6% respectively while rents in Wales fell -1.1% compared to January and 3.1% annually.

The post UK rents dip in February – led by London falls appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: UK rents dip in February – led by London falls

Mar
2

Property118 founder slams Shelter for causing landlord exodus

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Property118 founder slams Shelter for causing landlord exodus

/* =========================================
Property118 article normalisation
Fixes: paragraph spacing + empty sections
========================================= */

.p118-article { width:100%; }

.p118-article, .p118-article * { box-sizing:border-box; }

/* Enforce readable, consistent spacing regardless of theme */
.p118-article p{
margin:0 0 16px !important;
font-size:16px;
line-height:1.75;
color:#222;
}
.p118-article p:last-child{ margin-bottom:0 !important; }

.p118-article h3{
margin:0 0 12px !important;
font-size:18px;
font-weight:900;
color:#1f5aa6;
}

/* Section rhythm */
.p118-article .p118-sec{ margin:18px 0 !important; }
.p118-article .p118-sec–shade{ background:#f4f6f8; } /* no padding by request */

/* Quotes */
.p118-article blockquote{
margin:0 0 16px !important;
padding:0 !important; /* keep within “no padding” preference */
border:0 !important;
}
.p118-article blockquote p{
margin:0 !important;
font-style:italic;
}

/* Links */
.p118-article a{ text-decoration:underline; }

/* =========================================
Fundraising block (your provided design)
Restored in full + isolated from theme
========================================= */

.p118-article .p118-supportWrap{ margin:22px 0 0 !important; }
.p118-article .p118-supportWrap,
.p118-article .p118-supportWrap * { box-sizing:border-box; }

.p118s-wrap{width:100%;padding:0}

/* HERO */
.p118s-hero{border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:16px;overflow:hidden;background:#081f3a;margin:12px 0 18px}
.p118s-heroInner{padding:22px;background:
radial-gradient(1100px 460px at 10% 0%, rgba(255,106,0,0.18), rgba(255,106,0,0) 60%),
radial-gradient(900px 420px at 90% 20%, rgba(30,115,190,0.16), rgba(30,115,190,0) 60%),
linear-gradient(180deg, rgba(8,31,58,0.96), rgba(8,31,58,0.92))
}
.p118s-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:1fr;gap:18px;align-items:start}
@media(min-width:900px){.p118s-grid{grid-template-columns:1.45fr 0.55fr}}
.p118s-h1{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:30px;line-height:1.15;font-weight:900;color:#fff}
.p118s-lead{margin:0 0 14px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.65;color:rgba(255,255,255,0.9);max-width:70ch}
.p118s-actions{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:10px;margin-top:8px}
.p118s-btn{display:inline-block;text-decoration:none;font-weight:900;border-radius:12px;padding:11px 14px}
.p118s-btnPrimary{background:#ff6a00;color:#111}
.p118s-btnGhost{background:transparent;border:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.28);color:#fff}

/* PROOF PILLS */
.p118s-proof{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(12,1fr);gap:10px;margin-top:14px}
.p118s-pill{grid-column:span 12;background:rgba(255,255,255,0.07);border:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.11);border-radius:14px;padding:12px}
@media(min-width:900px){.p118s-pill{grid-column:span 4}}
.p118s-pillLabel{margin:0 0 6px;font-size:11px;letter-spacing:0.02em;text-transform:uppercase;color:rgba(255,255,255,0.7)}
.p118s-pillValue{margin:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:900;color:#fff}
.p118s-pillSub{margin:4px 0 0;font-size:12px;line-height:1.45;color:rgba(255,255,255,0.82)}

/* RIGHT PANEL */
.p118s-panel{background:rgba(255,255,255,0.06);border:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.12);border-radius:14px;padding:14px}
@media(min-width:900px){.p118s-panel{position:sticky;top:18px}}
.p118s-panelTitle{margin:0 0 6px;font-size:13px;font-weight:900;color:#fff}
.p118s-panelText{margin:0 0 12px;font-size:13px;line-height:1.55;color:rgba(255,255,255,0.86)}
.p118s-amounts{display:grid;grid-template-columns:1fr;gap:10px}
.p118s-chip{display:block;text-align:center;background:#fff;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;padding:11px 10px;border-radius:12px;font-weight:900;text-decoration:none;color:#111}
.p118s-chip small{display:block;font-size:11px;font-weight:700;opacity:0.7;margin-top:2px}
.p118s-panelNote{margin:10px 0 0;font-size:12px;line-height:1.45;color:rgba(255,255,255,0.78)}
.p118s-panelNote a{color:#fff;text-decoration:underline}

/* SECTIONS */
.p118s-section{margin:22px 0}
.p118s-h3{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:18px;font-weight:900;color:#155ea6}
.p118s-p{margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#222;max-width:86ch}
.p118s-divider{height:1px;background:#eee;margin:24px 0}

/* SECTION BANDING */
.p118s-bandWrap{border-radius:16px;padding:16px;border:1px solid #e9eef5;background:#f7f9fc}
.p118s-bandWrap–tight{padding:14px}

/* CARDS */
.p118s-cards{display:grid;grid-template-columns:1fr;gap:12px}
@media(min-width:900px){.p118s-cards{grid-template-columns:1fr 1fr}}
.p118s-card{border:1px solid #e3e7ee;border-radius:14px;background:#fff;padding:14px}
.p118s-cardTitle{margin:0 0 8px;font-size:15px;font-weight:900;color:#111}
.p118s-cardText{margin:0;font-size:14px;line-height:1.6;color:#333}

/* TRUSTPILOT BAND */
.p118s-tpBand{border:1px solid #d9e7ff;border-radius:16px;background:#eef5ff;padding:16px}
.p118s-tpTop{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:12px;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-bottom:12px}
.p118s-tpTitle{margin:0;font-size:15px;font-weight:900;color:#111}
.p118s-tpMeta{margin:0;font-size:13px;color:#444}
.p118s-tpBtn{display:inline-block;padding:9px 12px;border-radius:12px;border:1px solid #cfe0ff;background:#fff;
text-decoration:none;font-weight:900;color:#155ea6}
.p118s-quotes{display:grid;grid-template-columns:1fr;gap:12px}
@media(min-width:900px){.p118s-quotes{grid-template-columns:1fr 1fr}}
.p118s-quote{margin:0;background:#fff;border:1px solid #e3e7ee;border-radius:14px;padding:12px}
.p118s-quote p{margin:0 0 8px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6;color:#222}
.p118s-quote footer{margin:0;font-size:12px;color:#666;opacity:0.85}

/* FORM */
.p118s-form{scroll-margin-top:90px}
.p118s-formBox{border:1px solid #e3e7ee;border-radius:16px;background:#fff;padding:16px}
.p118s-formNote{margin:10px 0 0;font-size:12px;line-height:1.55;color:#555}

/* FAQ */
.p118s-faq details{border:1px solid #e3e7ee;border-radius:14px;background:#fff;padding:12px 14px}
.p118s-faq details + details{margin-top:10px}
.p118s-faq summary{cursor:pointer;font-weight:900;color:#111}
.p118s-faq p{margin:8px 0 0;font-size:14px;line-height:1.6;color:#333}

/* Gravity Forms styling inside our box */
.p118s-formBox .gform_wrapper{margin:0}
.p118s-formBox .gfield_label{font-weight:800}
.p118s-formBox input[type=”text”],
.p118s-formBox input[type=”email”],
.p118s-formBox input[type=”tel”],
.p118s-formBox select,
.p118s-formBox textarea{border-radius:10px}
.p118s-formBox .gform_footer input[type=”submit”]{background:#ff6a00;border:none;border-radius:12px;font-weight:900;padding:12px 16px}
.p118s-formBox .gform_footer input[type=”submit”]:hover{filter:brightness(0.95)}

Property118 is publishing this analysis because the private rented sector is shrinking in plain sight, and the people who pay the price first are tenants.

Property118 has long argued that landlord confidence is not an abstract concept; it is the fuel that keeps rental supply flowing. Remove confidence and participation falls. When participation falls, supply tightens, rents rise, and choice disappears.

Against that backdrop, Property118’s founder has criticised Shelter for campaigning in a way that, in Property118’s view, has helped create the political conditions for a landlord exodus.

“Shelter has been highly effective at influencing policymakers,” he said. “The unintended consequence is that many landlords no longer see the sector as commercially sustainable. When landlords exit, the supply of rental housing falls. That inevitably drives rents higher and makes life harder for tenants.”

There is a second reason Property118 is setting this out in detail. Property118 articles appear in millions of Google search results each month. That reach exists because landlords, tenants, journalists, lenders and policymakers are all searching for clarity on what is happening to housing supply.

This is not about defending bad practice. Property118 has consistently supported professional standards and enforcement against rogues. This is about a widening gap between political messaging and commercial reality, and the damage that gap causes.

What the landlord exodus looks like in practice

“Landlord exodus” can sound like a slogan until you see how it plays out on the ground.

It is the portfolio landlord who sells one house each time a tenancy ends, not because they want to leave, but because keeping the property no longer meets their risk and return requirements.

It is the long-standing landlord who decides not to re-mortgage, because the next product comes with higher rates, stricter affordability, and a compliance burden that feels unending.

It is the landlord who would have bought again five years ago, but now chooses to de-lever, simplify, or step away entirely.

Property118 has covered this trend repeatedly. Recent examples include commentary on landlords exiting under regulatory pressure and still achieving strong sale prices, which often accelerates decision-making because the exit route appears commercially attractive. See: landlords exiting in under 28 days.

Property118 has also reported on broader indicators of declining confidence, including the interaction between rising costs, legislation and the practical strain of running rental homes to an ever-tightening standard. See: landlord confidence plummets amid soaring costs and new legislation.

The important point is this; most landlords do not exit dramatically, they exit incrementally. That matters because the sector can shrink for years before the political system admits what is happening. By the time the consequences become undeniable, rents have already reset higher and the loss of supply becomes hard to reverse.

Property118 is not alone in reporting the trend. The debate has reached Parliament, with peers raising explicit concerns about landlords “voting with their feet” during discussions linked to the Renters’ Rights Act. See: fears of landlord exodus raised in Lords debate.

Why John Lewis matters, and why it changed the argument overnight

For years, the default response to concerns about landlord exits has been to suggest that institutional capital will simply replace individual landlords. The theory is that build-to-rent will scale up and fill the gap.

Then came John Lewis.

The John Lewis Partnership announced a high-profile entry into build-to-rent, with ambitious plans that were widely interpreted as a sign of confidence in long-term rental housing. It carried the authority of a trusted national brand and the financial weight of an institution that plans in decades.

Property118 has now reported that John Lewis is exiting those build-to-rent ambitions, citing the commercial reality of higher borrowing and construction costs, and a changed market environment. See: John Lewis exits build-to-rent housing projects.

This matters because institutional investors do not leave the sector due to emotion. They leave when the numbers no longer work.

Property118’s view is straightforward. If a well-capitalised institution reassesses and retreats, it becomes far harder to dismiss the warnings coming from smaller landlords, letting agents and lenders.

“When a major institutional investor enters the sector with long-term ambitions and then withdraws after assessing the commercial realities, it reinforces what private landlords have been experiencing for years,” Property118’s founder said. “This is not about sentiment. It is about viability.”

Build-to-rent is still part of the housing mix. Property118 is not arguing otherwise. The question is whether it can scale fast enough, in enough places, and at the right price points, to offset supply lost through landlord exits.

John Lewis stepping back makes that question more urgent.

Shelter’s influence, and the problem with campaigning without supply accountability

Property118 is directly critical of Shelter for one central reason. In Property118’s view, Shelter has been a leading force in pushing a political narrative that frames landlords primarily as a problem to be constrained, rather than as participants who must remain willing to provide housing if supply is to hold up.

Shelter is a major national charity with significant financial resources, receiving income from donations and grants that runs into many millions of pounds each year. Its work includes campaigning, policy advocacy, and the provision of advice and support services. It does not, however, build or provide housing at scale.

Property118’s concern is not that Shelter campaigns, it is that the campaigning environment has become disconnected from supply accountability. The louder the pressure to constrain landlords becomes, the weaker the incentive becomes to stay in the sector and maintain rental homes.

Property118 has previously reported on Shelter’s public commentary around rising rents and the temporary accommodation crisis, alongside warnings from industry bodies about landlord exits. See: Shelter blames rising rents as NRLA warns of landlord exodus.

“Shelter’s objectives are framed around protecting tenants,” Property118’s founder said. “The difficulty is that policies which discourage landlords from providing housing ultimately reduce supply. The result is fewer homes and higher rents.”

Shelter, like other housing charities, argues that stronger regulation is necessary to improve standards and protect renters. That is an argument many people find compelling. The issue is what happens when regulation, tax and political messaging combine to reduce participation. Good intentions do not override market mechanics.

When supply contracts, tenants compete harder. When tenants compete harder, rents rise and choice falls. That is not ideology, it is the unavoidable consequence of a sector becoming less attractive to operate within.

Renters’ Rights Act uncertainty, and a government that admits it did not assess supply impact

The Renters’ Rights Act represents one of the most significant shifts in the private rented sector for a generation. It changes the practical balance of risk, enforcement, and certainty around possession and tenancy structures.

What is astonishing, and now firmly in the public domain, is that the government has admitted it did not carry out an impact assessment on how key elements of the Renters’ Rights Act might affect rental supply.

Property118 has reported this directly, including the written question that triggered the admission. See: government admits no impact assessment of Renters’ Rights Act on supply.

For Property118, this is not a procedural footnote. It is the heart of the problem.

If government does not model the impact on supply, it risks designing reforms that feel morally satisfying but deliver worse outcomes, especially for the renters they aim to protect.

Property118 has also reported on related issues around readiness and capacity, including claims about court preparedness, and the reality of extended waiting times. See: government claims courts will be ready for Renters’ Rights Act.

The sector’s need is not simply new rules. It is predictable enforcement, workable processes, and policy that understands how landlords make decisions. A stable market is built on clarity. If the rules feel uncertain, contested, or operationally unrealistic, participation declines.

Reform UK’s pledge to scrap the Renters’ Rights Act shows how politically fragile the framework has become

Legislation that reshapes a market should ideally settle into place and remain stable for years. The private rented sector relies on long-term commitments; mortgage terms, refurbishment cycles and portfolio planning all operate on multi-year horizons.

Instead, the Renters’ Rights Act is already politically contested, with Reform UK signalling an intention to repeal it.

Property118 has published commentary on this point and its implications for confidence and supply. See: Property118 analysis on Reform UK and the Renters’ Rights Act.

For Property118, the key issue is not which party is right. It is what this level of political volatility does to supply.

Landlords and institutional investors watch signals. If they believe the rules may change again, they delay investment, reduce exposure, or exit. That does not require a conspiracy, just rational decision-making.

In a market already short of homes, hesitation becomes a supply problem. Property118’s founder put it bluntly; “Housing investment depends on stability. When the legislative framework becomes uncertain or politically contested, landlords pause or withdraw. That inevitably tightens supply.”

The consequence tenants feel first: less choice, higher rents, and reduced mobility

It is tempting for campaigners to talk about landlords as though they are optional, but the housing system does not work that way.

Social housing is not expanding fast enough to meet need. Owner-occupation remains inaccessible for many. The private rented sector is the pressure valve, and it only functions when enough people are willing to provide homes to rent. When the pressure valve tightens, tenants feel it. Not in theory, but in daily life.

Viewings become competitive, tenants make rushed decisions, families accept compromises on location, size and condition. People stay put because moving is too hard, even when work, school or family life would benefit from flexibility.

Property118 has also explored the wider directional risks, including international policy reversals where governments tightened rules, triggered exits, then scrambled to reverse course. See: anti-landlord policy U-turns abroad spark warnings for the UK.

This is why Property118 keeps returning to the same point; tenant protection and supply are not competing objectives, they are linked. If the UK wants better standards, it must enforce against rogues and support professionalism. If it wants stable rents and better choice, it must also maintain conditions in which landlords and institutions remain willing to provide homes.

Property118’s position: stop pretending supply is automatic

Property118 is not asking for a return to the past, the sector has moved on, and standards have risen and must continue to rise.

Property118 is asking for a policy approach that accepts one basic truth; rental supply is not automatic. It is the product of commercial decisions made by individuals and institutions over many years. When those decisions turn negative, rental housing disappears. It may reappear later, but often at a higher rent level, or in a different ownership model, or not at all.

That is why Property118 believes Shelter must take responsibility for the consequences of campaigning that pushes policy in one direction without acknowledging supply effects.

“This is not about defending landlords,” Property118’s founder said. “It is about protecting tenants from the predictable consequences of shrinking supply. If we keep reducing participation, we will keep increasing rents and instability.”

Property118 will continue reporting on landlord exits, institutional investment shifts, and the real-world impacts of legislation as it lands.

For policymakers and campaigners, the challenge is not to win the argument, it is to avoid being surprised by the outcome.

For tenants, the priority is simple; more homes, more choice and more stability.

Property118’s warning is equally simple. If the UK continues to pursue housing reform without supply accountability, the landlord exodus will accelerate, and the people who will suffer first are the renters the reforms were meant to protect.

Why Property118 continues to publish this reporting

Property118 exists to report openly on developments affecting landlords, tenants, and the housing market. Property118 does not operate behind a paywall. Property118 does not restrict access to its reporting. Property118 remains free to read because access to accurate information protects landlords from costly mistakes and helps maintain confidence in the sector.

Property118 articles now appear in more than 3,000,000 Google search impressions each month. That reach exists because landlords, lenders, journalists and policymakers rely on Property118 as a primary source of commercially grounded reporting on the private rented sector.

Maintaining that independence requires ongoing support. Property118 receives no government funding and does not rely on political sponsorship. Its independence allows Property118 to publish evidence-led analysis without compromise.

For landlords who value independent reporting, the option to support Property118 is provided below.

Support UK landlords, keep Property118 independent

Property118 exists to help landlords stay informed, commercially resilient, and legally aware.
It is free to read, free to subscribe, and built on the shared experience of landlords across the UK.

Google reach

3,000,000+ search impressions a month

Based on Google Search Console performance data.

What you get

News, forums, guidance

Practical insight from real-world landlord experience.

Independence

No paywall, no spin

Support protects the ability to publish without compromise.

Why your support matters

Landlords are running businesses in a policy environment that often feels unpredictable.
Clarity reduces mistakes, protects cashflow, and helps you keep control of your plans.
Property118 exists to provide that clarity, openly and consistently.

Security through information

Clear reporting reduces costly mistakes and protects cashflow.

Strength through community

A landlord community sharing experience is harder to ignore.

Independence you can trust

Support protects the ability to publish without compromise.

Continuity that keeps working

Predictable funding supports long-term work that protects landlords’ interests.

What your monthly support enables

Consistent, landlord-focused journalism

Reporting that is commercially rational, evidence-led, and written for landlords rather than headlines.

A stable platform and better user experience

Site running costs, performance improvements, security updates, and the technical work that keeps everything reliable.

Practical education and best practice

Guidance that helps landlords make stronger decisions, avoid mistakes, and protect long-term outcomes.

Credibility and independence

The ability to publish without being steered by anyone else’s commercial or political agenda.

Independently reviewed on Trustpilot

TrustScore 4.8


Read reviews on Trustpilot

“This is a great platform for landlords. I have had so much useful advice on here over the past five years.”

Trustpilot reviewer: Karl N.

“This is my main source to keep up with the ever changing PRS environment and regulations.”

Trustpilot reviewer: Ms H.

“The ability to get my problem with a tenant across to thousands of other landlords was extremely helpful.”

Trustpilot reviewer: Grahame K.

“I find it incredibly useful to get access to a variety of very experience landlords that have been there and done it.”

Trustpilot reviewer: Craig

Support Property118 here

This is a monthly recurring contribution. Monthly support is what creates stability and protects independence.

/* “function”==typeof InitializeEditor,callIfLoaded:function(o){return!(!gform.domLoaded||!gform.scriptsLoaded||!gform.themeScriptsLoaded&&!gform.isFormEditor()||(gform.isFormEditor()&&console.warn(“The use of gform.initializeOnLoaded() is deprecated in the form editor context and will be removed in Gravity Forms 3.1.”),o(),0))},initializeOnLoaded:function(o){gform.callIfLoaded(o)||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.scriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,()=>{gform.domLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}))},hooks:{action:{},filter:{}},addAction:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“action”,o,r,e,t)},addFilter:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“filter”,o,r,e,t)},doAction:function(o){gform.doHook(“action”,o,arguments)},applyFilters:function(o){return gform.doHook(“filter”,o,arguments)},removeAction:function(o,r){gform.removeHook(“action”,o,r)},removeFilter:function(o,r,e){gform.removeHook(“filter”,o,r,e)},addHook:function(o,r,e,t,n){null==gform.hooks[o][r]&&(gform.hooks[o][r]=[]);var d=gform.hooks[o][r];null==n&&(n=r+”_”+d.length),gform.hooks[o][r].push({tag:n,callable:e,priority:t=null==t?10:t})},doHook:function(r,o,e){var t;if(e=Array.prototype.slice.call(e,1),null!=gform.hooks[r][o]&&((o=gform.hooks[r][o]).sort(function(o,r){return o.priority-r.priority}),o.forEach(function(o){“function”!=typeof(t=o.callable)&&(t=window[t]),”action”==r?t.apply(null,e):e[0]=t.apply(null,e)})),”filter”==r)return e[0]},removeHook:function(o,r,t,n){var e;null!=gform.hooks[o][r]&&(e=(e=gform.hooks[o][r]).filter(function(o,r,e){return!!(null!=n&&n!=o.tag||null!=t&&t!=o.priority)}),gform.hooks[o][r]=e)}});
/* ]]> */

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Next Steps: Install a Payment Add-On

To accept donations via this form you will need to install one of our payment add-ons. To learn more about your payment add-on options, visit the following page (https://www.gravityforms.com/blog/payment-add-ons). Important: Delete this tip before you publish the form.
Name(Required)



Donation Amount(Required)
Choose how much you would like to donate each month.

Please note this is a monthly recurring subscription until cancelled with your card provider or by emailing info@property118.com

:root {
–link-login-string: “Link login”
}

document.getElementById( “ak_js_1″ ).setAttribute( “value”, ( new Date() ).getTime() );

/* = 0;if(!is_postback){return;}var form_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_wrapper_560′);var is_confirmation = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_confirmation_wrapper_560′).length > 0;var is_redirect = contents.indexOf(‘gformRedirect(){‘) >= 0;var is_form = form_content.length > 0 && ! is_redirect && ! is_confirmation;var mt = parseInt(jQuery(‘html’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + parseInt(jQuery(‘body’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + 100;if(is_form){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_560′).html(form_content.html());if(form_content.hasClass(‘gform_validation_error’)){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_560′).addClass(‘gform_validation_error’);} else {jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_560′).removeClass(‘gform_validation_error’);}setTimeout( function() { /* delay the scroll by 50 milliseconds to fix a bug in chrome */ jQuery(document).scrollTop(jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_560′).offset().top – mt); }, 50 );if(window[‘gformInitDatepicker’]) {gformInitDatepicker();}if(window[‘gformInitPriceFields’]) {gformInitPriceFields();}var current_page = jQuery(‘#gform_source_page_number_560′).val();gformInitSpinner( 560, ‘https://www.property118.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/images/spinner.svg’, true );jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_page_loaded’, [560, current_page]);window[‘gf_submitting_560′] = false;}else if(!is_redirect){var confirmation_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘.GF_AJAX_POSTBACK’).html();if(!confirmation_content){confirmation_content = contents;}jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_560′).replaceWith(confirmation_content);jQuery(document).scrollTop(jQuery(‘#gf_560′).offset().top – mt);jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_confirmation_loaded’, [560]);window[‘gf_submitting_560′] = false;wp.a11y.speak(jQuery(‘#gform_confirmation_message_560′).text());}else{jQuery(‘#gform_560′).append(contents);if(window[‘gformRedirect’]) {gformRedirect();}}jQuery(document).trigger(“gform_pre_post_render”, [{ formId: “560”, currentPage: “current_page”, abort: function() { this.preventDefault(); } }]); if (event && event.defaultPrevented) { return; } const gformWrapperDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_wrapper_560″ ); if ( gformWrapperDiv ) { const visibilitySpan = document.createElement( “span” ); visibilitySpan.id = “gform_visibility_test_560″; gformWrapperDiv.insertAdjacentElement( “afterend”, visibilitySpan ); } const visibilityTestDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_visibility_test_560″ ); let postRenderFired = false; function triggerPostRender() { if ( postRenderFired ) { return; } postRenderFired = true; gform.core.triggerPostRenderEvents( 560, current_page ); if ( visibilityTestDiv ) { visibilityTestDiv.parentNode.removeChild( visibilityTestDiv ); } } function debounce( func, wait, immediate ) { var timeout; return function() { var context = this, args = arguments; var later = function() { timeout = null; if ( !immediate ) func.apply( context, args ); }; var callNow = immediate && !timeout; clearTimeout( timeout ); timeout = setTimeout( later, wait ); if ( callNow ) func.apply( context, args ); }; } const debouncedTriggerPostRender = debounce( function() { triggerPostRender(); }, 200 ); if ( visibilityTestDiv && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent === null ) { const observer = new MutationObserver( ( mutations ) => { mutations.forEach( ( mutation ) => { if ( mutation.type === ‘attributes’ && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent !== null ) { debouncedTriggerPostRender(); observer.disconnect(); } }); }); observer.observe( document.body, { attributes: true, childList: false, subtree: true, attributeFilter: [ ‘style’, ‘class’ ], }); } else { triggerPostRender(); } } );} );
/* ]]> */

You can cancel later. If you need help with your subscription, email info@property118.com.

Questions landlords often ask

What am I supporting, exactly?

You are supporting the ongoing running of an independent platform that helps landlords stay informed, share best practice, and keep control of decisions.

Is this a monthly payment?

Yes. This page is designed for monthly support, because predictable funding is what creates stability.

Can I cancel later?

Yes. If you want to cancel, email info@property118.com.

Why ask for support if the content is free?

Keeping content free makes it accessible to every landlord. Monthly support is what protects that independence and consistency.

/* Auto-select Gravity Forms monthly amount when clicking hero amount buttons */
(function(){
function normalise(s){return (s||”).toLowerCase().replace(/s+/g,’ ‘).trim();}
function findAmountRadio(amount){
var form = document.getElementById(‘gform_560′);
if(!form) return null;
var radios = form.querySelectorAll(‘input[type=”radio”]’);
var amountStr = ‘£’ + String(amount);
for(var i=0;i<radios.length;i++){
var r = radios[i];
var label = form.querySelector('label[for="'+r.id+'"]');
var text = normalise(label ? label.textContent : '');
if(text.indexOf(normalise(amountStr)) !== -1) return r;
}
return null;
}
function scrollToForm(){
var el = document.getElementById('support-form');
if(el) el.scrollIntoView({behavior:'smooth',block:'start'});
}
document.addEventListener('click', function(e){
var a = e.target.closest('a[data-p118-amount]');
if(!a) return;
e.preventDefault();
var amount = a.getAttribute('data-p118-amount');
scrollToForm();
setTimeout(function(){
var radio = findAmountRadio(amount);
if(radio){
radio.checked = true;
radio.dispatchEvent(new Event('change', {bubbles:true}));
var label = document.querySelector('label[for="'+radio.id+'"]');
if(label){ label.scrollIntoView({behavior:'smooth', block:'center'}); }
}
}, 650);
}, true);
})();

The post Property118 founder slams Shelter for causing landlord exodus appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Property118 founder slams Shelter for causing landlord exodus

Mar
2

Green councillor calls for local rent control powers

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Green councillor calls for local rent control powers

A councillor has claimed rent controls must be introduced to stop renters from “being plunged into economic hardship.”

Green councillor Alex Mace put forward a motion to Worcester City Council calling for rent controls to be introduced in the city.

Cllr Mace said that while the Renters’ Rights Act will strengthen renters’ rights, it does not go far enough to tackle soaring rents.

People before profit

In a council meeting, Green councillors urged Worcester City Council to vote in favour of the motion, arguing that the government should devolve rent control powers to local authorities.

The Green councillors pointed to a growing number of local authorities and leaders calling for powers to introduce rent controls in the private rented sector, including the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan and Bristol City Council. Mr Khan previously campaigned to introduce rent controls during his London mayoral campaign.

The councillors also pointed to the Scottish government introducing powers for councils to implement rent controls.

Green councillor Alex Mace claimed rent controls would put people before profit.

He said: “Worcester’s spiralling housing costs are central to the cost of living crisis in our city, with private renters being among the hardest hit. Without making renting more affordable, thousands of residents in the city will continue to face staggering costs, be plunged further into economic hardship and be priced out.

“Rent controls are far from a panacea, they will not fix the housing crisis alone or overnight. However, they are a necessary tool to transition to a housing system which puts people before profit.”

Do not support rent controls

Cllr Mace added that while the Renters’ Rights Act is an important piece of legislation, it does not tackle the affordability crisis, as rents can still be raised to market levels.

However, Liberal Democrat councillors voted against the motion, with councillor Jessie Jagger saying: “We will be voting against the motion as we do not support rent controls. We want to send a clear message to the market that this is not a policy we want to pursue.”

The motion was approved by Worcester City Council with an amendment requiring the council’s communities committee to first consider how the Renters’ Rights Act has impacted residents before writing to the Housing Secretary to request that the government allow local authorities to introduce controls on private sector rents.

The full council meeting can be seen by clicking here with the rent control motion starting at 1:05:58

The post Green councillor calls for local rent control powers appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Green councillor calls for local rent control powers

Feb
27

Government admits no impact assessment of Renters’ Rights Act on supply

Author admin    Category Uncategorized     Tags

Property118

Government admits no impact assessment of Renters’ Rights Act on supply

The government admits it has not carried out an impact assessment on how the abolition of fixed-term tenancies will affect rental supply.

In a written question, Liberal Democrat MP Dr Roz Savage asked what assessment had been made of removing fixed-term tenancies under the Renters’ Rights Act, including the impact on certainty for landlords seeking to sell or recover possession and the potential effect on rental supply.

However, Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook claimed no such assessment has been carried out.

Abolition of fixed-term tenancies will cause chaos

Mr Pennycook pointed to the Renters’ Rights Act impact assessment, which claims the abolition of fixed-term tenancies and replacing them with periodic tenancies will “result in fewer voluntary household moves as tenants will no longer need to plan to move at the end of a fixed term period.”

The assessment looks at the English Housing Survey, which says approximately 6.3% of tenants who moved in the previous 12 months listed the end of the fixed term as the sole reason for moving.

The assessment claims: “These are voluntary moves from tenants that are solely due to the existence of fixed terms, this may be in situations where tenants are unable to commit to another term of at least 12 months.”

However, as previously reported by Property118, many industry experts have warned the abolition of fixed-term tenancies will cause chaos, particularly for the student rental market.

ARLA Propertymark regional executive for Cornwall, Sophie Lang, told Property118: “The student rental market runs in a very set cycle. We know when the term times are and when the year ends. It was very easy to have a fixed-term tenancy, which gave everyone peace of mind that they had their housing sorted.

“Removing fixed-term tenancies will cause uncertainty for landlords and tenants because it means that fixed-term tenancies are no longer there as a protection.”

A survey by agency software firm Alto reveals more than a third (34%) of agents predict the end of fixed-term contracts could devastate the student letting system.

Landlords selling

Dr Savage also asked whether the Renters’ Rights Act could affect the frequency of tenant displacement caused by landlords selling properties, and trends in repeated forced moves for compliant tenants.

Mr Pennycook again confirmed that no assessment had been carried out on this.

The Renters’ Rights Act impact assessment claims the reforms are expected to result in only a small number of landlords exiting the market.

The assessment said: “There is a risk that costs from the legislation may result in some landlords leaving the sector. This is difficult to estimate precisely, though we would expect it to be substantially mitigated by the additional cost per rented property being a very small fraction of average annual rent and asset value.

“The available evidence to date does not suggest that similar reforms to abolish section 21 in Scotland have negatively impacted supply, nor changes introduced by the 2019 Tenant Fees Act, despite concerns they would.”

However, a study by the Scottish Association of Landlords shows a reduction of 22,000 rental properties in Scotland in just one year due to government policies and anti-landlord rhetoric.

A survey by the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) found that 41% of landlords plan to sell properties within the next 12 months, compared to only 6% who intend to buy.

The post Government admits no impact assessment of Renters’ Rights Act on supply appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Government admits no impact assessment of Renters’ Rights Act on supply

Categories

Archives

Calendar

March 2026
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Recent Posts

Quick Search

RSS More from Letting Links

Facebook Fan Page