City office space under threat as personified by Canary Wharf exodus
The pattern of office working is changing and nowhere is its effect on commercial property being felt more strongly than in London’s Docklands’ Canary Wharf.
A once thriving financial centre
The development of the wharf into a thriving financial centre just outside the City of London breathed new life into a run-down legacy of the days when London was a major shipping port, transforming the once poverty-stricken location.
The transformation was the brainchild of international developers and was conceived well before anyone had even thought the world would be turned upside down by a major pandemic. The resulting shift in the way people adapted to it – using technology to enable working from home (WFH) with Teams and Zoom conducting business meetings and customer services remotely – has hit commercial office occupancy rates hard.
These dockside property developments were risky even in the 1980s, that was until a critical mass of financial institutions started to move into the shiny glass towners at the Wharf. It was initially too cut-off from the London business and financial centre, too far away from where the wealthy bankers, lawyers and accountants traditionally did business. But this changed later as transport links were improved and these services moved in.
Property crash of the 1990s
The development came down with a mighty crash in a commercial property crisis of 1992 but the Canadian developer, Olympia & York, bought it back from the ashes and set about selling the office development idea hard. With new transport links including the Docklands Light Railway, a new tube station, boat transport access and an a city airport, and the project developed a momentum of its own.
It was hailed as a triumph of London’s post-industrial world, a child of Margaret Thatcher’s city revolution. The giant steel and glass towers were taken up by the leading banks and city institutions, while every day, hordes of workers used the gleaming new transport links to fill the massive floor plates of these symbols of London’s financial success.
WFH establishes a pattern
Today, post-Covid, it’s all looking a tad different. What looks like becoming a newly established pattern of office working, the WFH hybrid model, has changed all the success that went before. The working week for capitals around the world has become one of work at home for one, two or even three days, while the balance is spent in the office.
You don’t have to be a property genius to see that the effect of this is to dramatically reduce the space these great financial institutions need to operate their businesses in. Surveys show that to date, London has been one of the centres most affected by WFH.
People are commonly staying home Mondays and Fridays and travelling into work in between. The result is the once packed-to-overcrowding transport links are now under used for much of the time and the service infrastructure of retail outlets for workers, the coffee shops and the restaurants, the clothing and footwear stores, are all suffering substantially.
At first people were sceptical that WFH would not last, that people would gradually drift back to their commuter schedules, back to their offices lives full-time after Covid subsided, and all would be back to normal. That this did not happen has surprised many and left commercial property owners licking their wounds and wondering how to adapt.
Reduced demand for space
A study by estate agent Knight Frank and another by international management consultants McKinsey and Co, find that at lease 50 per cent of all large, multinational companies are planning to reduce their office space as their workforces’ needs and preferences have altered radically in a matter of a couple of years.
The result is a dramatic reappraisal of the values of commercial properties in most major cities around the developed world. Schroders Investment Management claims that the value of UK commercial office property has lost over 20 per cent of its value since June 2022, driven it says by the WFH trend.
The employers of today, in a post-pandemic world, are likely to be looking for smaller, more flexible spaces. Open plan will be the order of the day with everyone, including senior staff, working closely together, and in many cases sharing desks and meeting spaces. In a world of mobile working, an office full of staff every day may be a thing of the past.
Once a mark of prestige to have an office location in Canary Wharf, it could become a sign of being left behind, out on a limb and stuck in a location that is becoming no longer fashionable? That’s the danger for Canary Wharf.
Valuation downgrades
The Canary Wharf Group, owned by Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund and Brookfield Asset Management, has had the embarrassment of recently being downgraded by Moody’s the international business analysis and credit ratings agency, noting that the company would in future have difficulty in filling and ultimately selling its offices “without offering substantial discounts”.
The exodus
What’s more, Moody’s itself looks like it might join the Canary Wharf exit. There it currently has around 1200 employees and is said to be seeking to reduce its current footprint of 170,000 sq ft., though it declined The Daily Telegraph’s request for comment on its office plans.
The Moody’s threat to depart comes after major blow to the centre as one of the most visible iconic buildings, HSBC’s glass tower, will be vacated as the Bank announced that in 2027 it will abandon its Docklands tower for one back in the City of London.
The 45-storey HSBC skyscraper will move its staff base to a smaller office at the former BT head office near St Paul’s, while “Magic Circle” law firm Clifford Chance last year also announced it was leaving the Docklands for the City of London. In addition, Barclays has sublet 500,000 sq ft of space at its Canary Wharf offices.
Credit Suisse is another bank trying to sub-let empty space at its Canary Wharf headquarters.
The effort to adapt
The Canary Wharf Group also declined to comment on its plans, but it is rumoured that it is now attempting to reinvent itself as a home for life sciences as it seems there’s a chronic shortage of suitable laboratory space.
Efforts to turn the location into a shopping and leisure destination appear to be struggling as one shop worker told The Guardian: “Mondays and Fridays are dead. This shop used to take a fair bit before Covid but now everything’s changed.”
Despite the Group’s efforts, adding shops, bars and restaurants over recent years, landscaping between its glass-and-steel towers, creating a public art trail, and free events aimed at families, it is struggling to shake off the wharf’s sterile and chilly atmosphere.
View Full Article: City office space under threat as personified by Canary Wharf exodus
Looming EPC changes already skewing the buy-to-let market, claims finance boss
The Government’s plans to force landlords to upgrade their properties to a minimum ‘C’ energy efficiency standard is already affecting how rental properties are being purchased, the boss of a big money firm has claimed.
Louisa Sedgwick, Commercial Director at Paragon Bank (main picture), says her firm’s poll of some 1,200 landlords has revealed that a quarter have already sought rental properties to purchase only if they already meet the likely minimum MEES certificate due to be introduced or require some work to get them to reach it.
Also, nearly two thirds of landlords said they would factor in the new EPC rules when buying future homes to rent.
Under the Government proposals, new rental tenancies will require a minimum EPC of C by April 2025, with all tenancies meeting that standard by 2028.
Two years
But it is over two years since the proposals were announced and Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities has recently hinted that their implementation will be delayed.
Nevertheless, Paragon says the proposals are influencing landlords’ business strategies more broadly with nearly two thirds having taken some form of action as a result.
This includes 20% having already made improvements to bring a property’s EPC rating up to C or above while a similar proportion are in the process of retrofitting their properties with energy-saving measures to increase the EPC rating to C or above.
Upgrade work
Approximately 10% of landlords said they had sold properties rather than pay for upgrade work while 7% said their properties would never make a ‘C’ certificate.
“Michael Gove’s recent comments mean it’s looking increasingly likely that any new PRS energy efficiency standards will be delayed,” says Sedgwick.
“Nevertheless, it’s encouraging to see landlords are already building on the progress made over the last decade in making privately rented homes more sustainable.”
View Full Article: Looming EPC changes already skewing the buy-to-let market, claims finance boss
Buildings insurance increases 70% since last year?
Hi all, I have a 2 bed maisonette in blocks of 4, there are 5 blocks in total.
The Managing Agents have sent the invoices for the ground rent/buildings Insurance to each leaseholder in the blocks (20 in total) which represents 1:20th of the alleged policy premium.
View Full Article: Buildings insurance increases 70% since last year?
BREAKING: Gove green lights expensive new licencing scheme in Nottingham
Michael Gove has given Nottingham city council the green light to proceed with one of the UK’s most expensive and controversial selective licensing schemes.
Due to start on December 1st, it will require all rented properties within 20 of its wards to be licenced and has been voted through despite vociferous opposition from local landlords, as LandlordZONE has reported in recent months, including how both the NRLA and EMPO have slammed the scheme.
Some 30,000 properties will be covered by the new rules which, although it is slightly smaller than the previous one that expires today, remains large enough to need Secretary of State approval.
The council has justified the move by claiming it will give private tenants “better quality accommodation and management as well as protection from bad landlords”, a council statement says.
“Tenants will also know what is expected of their landlord in terms of the maintenance, safety and management of their home.
“It will be introduced into areas of the city where the council has gathered evidence of poorer property conditions.
“Landlords of private rented properties in certain parts of the city will soon have to meet a set of conditions and ensure good management of their properties.”
Bad form
The council appears to have listened to some landlords concerns, saying it is simplifying the labyrinthine form landlords and agents were forced to use when applying for the previous scheme, which ran from 2018 until now.
Landlords with licences under that scheme will not need to apply for a new one until their existing one runs out, while those with properties covered by the scheme for the first time will need to apply after September 1st.
Its higher fees, which have been described by the NRLA as a ‘tax on landlords’ will be £1,118 over five years for non-accredited’ landlords – with accredited ones paying a lower fee.
‘Accredited’ means landlords who have Nottingham Rental Standard Accreditation via DASH or Unipol.
Councillor Jay Hayes (pictured), the City Council’s Portfolio Holder for Housing, says: “Having a licence will allow landlords to demonstrate that they provide decent quality accommodation for tenants, and we will work with landlords to support them to achieve the licence conditions.
“We believe the scheme will improve the reputation of private landlords, as well as Nottingham’s reputation for providing quality housing.”
Read a full list of the wards covered or partly covered by the scheme.
View Full Article: BREAKING: Gove green lights expensive new licencing scheme in Nottingham
Government is afraid EPC upgrades will be final straw for landlords, says big bank
A leading lender believes the government’s likely decision to row back on EPCs is linked to fears that it will hit an already struggling PRS.
Earlier this week, Housing Secretary Michael Gove suggested a delay in bringing in energy efficiency plans – for rental properties to gain an EPC grade C by 2028 – citing financial pressures on landlords.
Shawbrook Bank’s MD of real estate, Emma Cox (main picture), says the rumoured plans to push back this deadline are reflective of the wider economic challenges facing the rented sector, with the government needing to balance the transition to a low carbon economy with protecting socio-economic groups most directly impacted.
“Tenants are facing rising rents and landlords themselves are adapting to a series of tax and regulatory changes over the last few years alongside rising mortgage rates,” says Cox.
Great strides
“While the property sector has been making great strides towards EPC requirements, our research shows that only a quarter of landlords’ portfolios contain properties that all meet the EPC C target.”
Nearly four-in-ten (38%) have properties that are all rated D or below, rising to 58% of investors in London. Some 71% of all landlords still own at least one property in this category, says Shawbrook.
While the proposed timeline could be pushed back, these changes are still coming, adds Cox.
“Acting sooner rather than later can ensure that landlords make the necessary investments to their portfolio and could help to spread that cost over a longer period.
“The lending industry will need to continue to step up with innovative solutions to fund EPC improvements. Landlords themselves could create competitive advantage as energy bills continue to add significant pressure on incomes.”
View Full Article: Government is afraid EPC upgrades will be final straw for landlords, says big bank
Landlords face hefty bill for EPC upgrades
Landlords face a £30 billion bill to upgrade their properties to an EPC rating of C, according to new research.
Letting agents Savills reveal 2.9 million homes in the PRS need upgrading to meet proposed regulations to bring all properties to EPC C.
View Full Article: Landlords face hefty bill for EPC upgrades
Property firm reports more landlords selling up as ‘red tape’ burden rises
Home buying company the Open Property Group (OPG) has reported a 56% jump in PRS property purchases during the past year, with landlords blaming red tape for their decision to sell up.
It bought nearly £6 million worth of property from homeowners and landlords looking for a fast and hassle-free sale in the first half of 2023 and saw a 21% rise in sales between Q1 and Q2.
Nearly 90% of these were houses with an average purchase price of £132,789, typically taking 29 days for completion.
OPG reports that despite fewer transactions taking place across the property sector, about two in five sales are falling through. As a result, more people are turning to cash buyers like OPG as the market continues to feel economic and social pressures, says MD Jason Harris-Cohen (pictured).
“We have seen a record number of completions in the first half of 2023 and unsurprisingly, we’ve also increased our rental purchase activities as landlords continue to face higher finance, management and tax bills.
“But it’s actually increasing legislation that seems to be the most common motivation for investors.”
Tenure
OPG can buy any type of property, regardless of tenure, and have bought many buy-to-let properties without the landlord needing to evict tenants.
The company works with a network of investors, auction houses and estate agents to sell some of the properties on, mostly after some light refurbishment and/or asset management.
Adds Harris-Cohen: “With no end to the cost-of-living crisis on the horizon, I expect enquires to increase for the remainder of the year. But we predict a quieter period for onward sales as we have had slightly below expected results and will be more cautiously trading to retain more capital.”
View Full Article: Property firm reports more landlords selling up as ‘red tape’ burden rises
Payday! Three tenants to share £20,000 after landlord fails to licence property
Three tenants have won a £20,160 rent repayment order from their landlord who failed to licence his HMO.
A First Tier Property Tribunal found that Simon Freed let out the three-bedroom flat in Frognal Court, Camden (main picture), after the council had introduced an additional licensing scheme.
The tenants signed a tenancy agreement with him, trading as F&M Investments Ltd, for 12 months in September 2021, paying their £2,400-a-month rent first to the landlord and then to Vita Properties, which the court ruled was evidence that Freed was within the definition of a person managing the premises.
However, he was debarred from proceedings as he had only responded to court directions on the morning of the hearing after claiming emails had gone into his junk mail folder.
Reasonable excuse
The tribunal judge ruled that not checking his email folders was not a reasonable excuse for not complying with the directions. He also ruled that there was insufficient evidence to raise a defence of reasonable excuse.
Freed’s tenants claimed that their landlord didn’t provide a gas safety certificate, electrical installation condition report and How to Rent guide, or display his details.
They had applied for a rent repayment order of £28,800, however, as the house didn’t have any major structural or safety defects, the court made a total reduction of 30%.
The judge said: “There was some indication that Mr Freed rented other properties elsewhere, as correspondence from his former managing agents refers to them managing ‘properties’. This would suggest a slightly higher level of culpability.”
Pic: Chancellors/Rightmove
Read the decision in full.
View Full Article: Payday! Three tenants to share £20,000 after landlord fails to licence property
Your invitation to the biggest virtual property event
On Wednesday 2nd August, 6pm to 9pm, there is a fantastic opportunity for you to connect with investors from all around the UK and overseas who you might otherwise never get to meet, as a participant in the property investors network
View Full Article: Your invitation to the biggest virtual property event
Landlord’s EPC deadline: Does anyone else feel conned?
Have you invested thousands of pounds to upgrade your rental property to meet the proposed EPC rating of C? Or have you decided it’s too expensive to do the work and sold up? Then this week’s news from Michael Gove probably made you very angry.
View Full Article: Landlord’s EPC deadline: Does anyone else feel conned?
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,739)
Archives
- October 2024 (12)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Defending Landlords from Unfair HMRC Attacks
- The exodus of landlords: How bad does it have to get?
- Renters’ Reform Coalition demands compensation for ‘no-fault’ evictions
- Rescue your Investment and move on: We’ll sell your properties in under 28 Days
- Landlords and second homeowners rush to sell – Zoopla