James Cleverley blames Labour’s Renters’ Rights Act after receiving Section 21 notice

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

James Cleverley blames Labour’s Renters’ Rights Act after receiving Section 21 notice

The Shadow Housing Secretary has said he has received a Section 21 notice, blaming Labour’s housing reforms for prompting landlords to sell up.

Speaking at a London Housing Conference, James Cleverly said the notice was issued after his landlord decided to sell the property.

He also warned that the Renters’ Rights Act will do more harm than good.

Renters’ Rights Act will not protect tenants

Mr Cleverly said his experience of receiving a Section 21 notice is “replicated thousands of times across the country”.

He blamed the Labour government for the Renters’ Rights Act, arguing that despite claims it is meant to protect tenants, it will have the opposite effect.

Speaking to PoliticsHome, he said: “The key bit of this is the arrogance with which Labour approached this process. They just refuse to listen to the points we’re making because it was we who were making those points.

“Unfortunately, now the people who are suffering are the people who could and should have a decent supply of properties in the private rented sector, and they don’t.

“The people who they claim to want to protect are the very people who are being disadvantaged by this and it didn’t have to be like this. If the Labour Party weren’t so arrogant and unwilling to listen, it wouldn’t be happening.”

Conservatives failed to ban Section 21

A Labour source hit back and told PoliticsHome: “The Shadow Housing Secretary will be furious when he finds out who is responsible for allowing no-fault evictions to continue.

“It’s his Conservative Party that failed to ban them during their 14 years in office.

“Labour in government is putting things right and ending this unfair practice to protect renters from suddenly being thrown out of their homes for no reason. If he has changed his views and now agrees with us, he should cross the floor and join Labour.”

The news comes ahead of the Renters’ Rights Act coming into force on 1 May 2026.

The post James Cleverley blames Labour’s Renters’ Rights Act after receiving Section 21 notice appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: James Cleverley blames Labour’s Renters’ Rights Act after receiving Section 21 notice

Landlords reducing exposure as regulatory pressure reshapes behaviour

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Property118

Landlords reducing exposure as regulatory pressure reshapes behaviour

A consistent theme running through the latest landlord data is the growing influence of regulatory and structural pressure on decision-making.

According to the Property118 Landlord Sentiment Survey Q1 2026, a majority of landlords are now choosing to reduce their exposure to the sector rather than expand within it. Based on 2,380 completed responses, 57% of landlords plan to reduce their portfolios over the next 12 months, compared with just 6.8% intending to grow. You can review the full findings here.

The implication is clear: external pressures are beginning to influence long-term strategy.

A changing operating environment

Over recent years, the environment in which landlords operate has evolved significantly. Tax treatment, regulatory requirements and compliance obligations have all shifted, creating a landscape that is more complex and, in some cases, less predictable than before.

The survey data suggests that landlords are responding to this environment in a measured way. Rather than attempting to navigate increasing complexity indefinitely, many are choosing to reduce their involvement.

Not a reaction, but a recalibration

It would be easy to interpret these decisions as a reaction to short-term pressure. The data points towards something more deliberate.

As highlighted elsewhere in the Property118 dataset, many landlords are operating with low levels of borrowing and significant equity.

This means that decisions to reduce exposure are not being forced by immediate financial constraints. Instead, they reflect a broader recalibration of how landlords wish to engage with the sector.

A shift in long-term outlook

When the operating environment becomes more complex, the long-term outlook naturally comes into focus. Landlords begin to consider not just current performance, but future sustainability. Questions around financing, structure, compliance and succession planning become more prominent.

The survey indicates that, for many, the balance has shifted. Continuing to expand under the current framework is no longer seen as the most attractive option.

Implications beyond individual portfolios

The cumulative effect of these decisions has wider implications. If a majority of landlords are reducing exposure, and relatively few are entering or expanding, the overall level of rental supply may be affected over time. This is not an immediate adjustment, but a gradual one, driven by thousands of individual decisions.

A sector adapting to its conditions

The data reflects a sector that is adapting, not abruptly, but steadily. Landlords are not disengaging overnight, but they are adjusting their level of involvement in response to a changing environment.

For now, one conclusion stands out: landlords are not simply reacting to pressure, they are recalibrating their long-term role within the private rented sector.

A conversation worth having?

If you are weighing up your own strategy, whether that’s to sell, expand, or restructure to improve profitibility, it is worth having a discussion with a Property118 consultant to take a closer look at how your portfolio is structured as a whole now, and to forecast the outcomes based on multiple scenario’s.

These conversations are typically most useful for landlords with established portfolios and relatively modest borrowing who are beginning to reflect on how their assets could work more effectively in the years ahead.

/* “function”==typeof InitializeEditor,callIfLoaded:function(o){return!(!gform.domLoaded||!gform.scriptsLoaded||!gform.themeScriptsLoaded&&!gform.isFormEditor()||(gform.isFormEditor()&&console.warn(“The use of gform.initializeOnLoaded() is deprecated in the form editor context and will be removed in Gravity Forms 3.1.”),o(),0))},initializeOnLoaded:function(o){gform.callIfLoaded(o)||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.scriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,()=>{gform.domLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}))},hooks:{action:{},filter:{}},addAction:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“action”,o,r,e,t)},addFilter:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“filter”,o,r,e,t)},doAction:function(o){gform.doHook(“action”,o,arguments)},applyFilters:function(o){return gform.doHook(“filter”,o,arguments)},removeAction:function(o,r){gform.removeHook(“action”,o,r)},removeFilter:function(o,r,e){gform.removeHook(“filter”,o,r,e)},addHook:function(o,r,e,t,n){null==gform.hooks[o][r]&&(gform.hooks[o][r]=[]);var d=gform.hooks[o][r];null==n&&(n=r+”_”+d.length),gform.hooks[o][r].push({tag:n,callable:e,priority:t=null==t?10:t})},doHook:function(r,o,e){var t;if(e=Array.prototype.slice.call(e,1),null!=gform.hooks[r][o]&&((o=gform.hooks[r][o]).sort(function(o,r){return o.priority-r.priority}),o.forEach(function(o){“function”!=typeof(t=o.callable)&&(t=window[t]),”action”==r?t.apply(null,e):e[0]=t.apply(null,e)})),”filter”==r)return e[0]},removeHook:function(o,r,t,n){var e;null!=gform.hooks[o][r]&&(e=(e=gform.hooks[o][r]).filter(function(o,r,e){return!!(null!=n&&n!=o.tag||null!=t&&t!=o.priority)}),gform.hooks[o][r]=e)}});
/* ]]> */

/* = 0;if(!is_postback){return;}var form_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_wrapper_585′);var is_confirmation = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_confirmation_wrapper_585′).length > 0;var is_redirect = contents.indexOf(‘gformRedirect(){‘) >= 0;var is_form = form_content.length > 0 && ! is_redirect && ! is_confirmation;var mt = parseInt(jQuery(‘html’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + parseInt(jQuery(‘body’).css(‘margin-top’), 10) + 100;if(is_form){form_content.find(‘form’).css(‘opacity’, 0);jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).html(form_content.html());if(form_content.hasClass(‘gform_validation_error’)){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).addClass(‘gform_validation_error’);} else {jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).removeClass(‘gform_validation_error’);}setTimeout( function() { /* delay the scroll by 50 milliseconds to fix a bug in chrome */ }, 50 );if(window[‘gformInitDatepicker’]) {gformInitDatepicker();}if(window[‘gformInitPriceFields’]) {gformInitPriceFields();}var current_page = jQuery(‘#gform_source_page_number_585′).val();gformInitSpinner( 585, ‘https://www.property118.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/images/spinner.svg’, true );jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_page_loaded’, [585, current_page]);window[‘gf_submitting_585′] = false;}else if(!is_redirect){var confirmation_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘.GF_AJAX_POSTBACK’).html();if(!confirmation_content){confirmation_content = contents;}jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_585′).replaceWith(confirmation_content);jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_confirmation_loaded’, [585]);window[‘gf_submitting_585′] = false;wp.a11y.speak(jQuery(‘#gform_confirmation_message_585′).text());}else{jQuery(‘#gform_585′).append(contents);if(window[‘gformRedirect’]) {gformRedirect();}}jQuery(document).trigger(“gform_pre_post_render”, [{ formId: “585”, currentPage: “current_page”, abort: function() { this.preventDefault(); } }]); if (event && event.defaultPrevented) { return; } const gformWrapperDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_wrapper_585″ ); if ( gformWrapperDiv ) { const visibilitySpan = document.createElement( “span” ); visibilitySpan.id = “gform_visibility_test_585″; gformWrapperDiv.insertAdjacentElement( “afterend”, visibilitySpan ); } const visibilityTestDiv = document.getElementById( “gform_visibility_test_585″ ); let postRenderFired = false; function triggerPostRender() { if ( postRenderFired ) { return; } postRenderFired = true; gform.core.triggerPostRenderEvents( 585, current_page ); if ( visibilityTestDiv ) { visibilityTestDiv.parentNode.removeChild( visibilityTestDiv ); } } function debounce( func, wait, immediate ) { var timeout; return function() { var context = this, args = arguments; var later = function() { timeout = null; if ( !immediate ) func.apply( context, args ); }; var callNow = immediate && !timeout; clearTimeout( timeout ); timeout = setTimeout( later, wait ); if ( callNow ) func.apply( context, args ); }; } const debouncedTriggerPostRender = debounce( function() { triggerPostRender(); }, 200 ); if ( visibilityTestDiv && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent === null ) { const observer = new MutationObserver( ( mutations ) => { mutations.forEach( ( mutation ) => { if ( mutation.type === ‘attributes’ && visibilityTestDiv.offsetParent !== null ) { debouncedTriggerPostRender(); observer.disconnect(); } }); }); observer.observe( document.body, { attributes: true, childList: false, subtree: true, attributeFilter: [ ‘style’, ‘class’ ], }); } else { triggerPostRender(); } } );} );
/* ]]> */

The post Landlords reducing exposure as regulatory pressure reshapes behaviour appeared first on Property118.

View Full Article: Landlords reducing exposure as regulatory pressure reshapes behaviour