Landlord pays £90,000 in fines and costs for unlicenced houses, even though properties were in good shape
London Borough of Brent is latest council to get tough with landlords who don’t register their properties within Selective Licensing scheme areas.
A landlord in London
is the latest to be fined for renting out unlicenced properties within a
Selective Licensing scheme and is to pay a total of £90,763 despite the
properties (one of which is pictured) not giving council inspectors any serious
concerns.
Stephen Ige, aged
49, has pleaded guilty to renting out three unlicenced properties within the
London Borough of Brent after being told by council representatives several
times that he needed to comply.
The huge fine includes
£25,000 for each property plus £5,000 for failing to supply documents to Brent
and £10,763 in costs to the council.
The size of the
fines also reflects the fact that Ige is a repeat offender, having previously been
found to have illegally let two other properties in the area. He was later fined
£5,000 for each property but subsequently applied for licences for the two
properties.
Brent’s Selective
Licensing schemes operate in the wards of Dudden Hill, Kensal Green, Kilburn,
Mapesbury and Queen’s Park, although a further 13 wards may soon be included if
the borough’s recent application to the Secretary of State is given the green
light.
“Renting
out a property is a serious business and in Brent we have introduced selective
licensing to ensure that tenants are living in safe, well managed homes,” says Brent
Council’s cabinet member for housing and welfare reform Cllr Eleanor Southwood.
“If you are a
landlord in selective licensing area, failing to licence your property puts you
at risk of being prosecuted and fined.
“While the council did not identify any serious concerns with the
current state of Ige’s properties, our licensing scheme is designed to give
tenants confidence that they are living in homes that are safe.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Landlord pays £90,000 in fines and costs for unlicenced houses, even though properties were in good shape | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Landlord pays £90,000 in fines and costs for unlicenced houses, even though properties were in good shape
Counterclaim to section 8 for unreported mould?
Help! I have taken a tenant to court (section 8) rent arrears and the court provided the tenant with a solicitor. The tenant is now claiming that the property is not fit for purpose as it has damp mould in various places ( this has never been reported to me).
The post Counterclaim to section 8 for unreported mould? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Counterclaim to section 8 for unreported mould?
It’s a renters market, is the “tail wagging the Commercial Landlord’s dog?”
Rent paid in Arrears:
Given the toughest
trading conditions in living memory on Britain’s high streets – in
fact the trading conditions in retail are probably unprecedented –
tenants, at least those with a reasonable chance of surviving the
online onslaught, are beginning to “flex their muscles.”
It’s a tenant’s
market, where to some extent, lease terms permitting, they can
dictate conditions to their landlords, some of whom are struggling
themselves.
Intu, the leading shopping centre owners, for example, have just announced the possibility of a £1bn cash call on their shareholders. The debt-laden company, owners of shopping centres including the Trafford Centre in Manchester and Lakeside, among others, has announce it is in serious discussions with its major shareholders. These include The Peel Group, and recent investors including the Hong Kong-based Link Real Estate Investment Trust.
As retailers go into
administration, CVAs, and close down, others are rationalising their
estates by closing unprofitable locations. Property values and market
rents meantime are falling, given the mounting vacant spaces
appearing on the high street.
Whilst many stores
are over-rented (paying above the current market rent), due to the
long-term nature of business leases, some locations are tied-in for
some time and therefore their tenants are looking for other ways to
protect their cash-flows.
One way of doing
this, as WHSmith is attempting, is to agree with their landlords to
accept rents in arrears, as opposed to the time old industry practice
of quarterly rents in advance. The successful national stationery
chain is reported (Sunday Times 9th February) to be
asking landlords to make the switch from advance to arrears.
There’ no law that
states rents must be paid either way, it’s purely a matter of
convention, and indeed residential rents are almost always paid
monthly in advance. How rents are paid – monthly, quarterly,
advance or arrears – is a matter for negotiation between landlords
and tenant; its contractual not a statutory requirement. In normal
circumstances when there is competition for rentals between tenants,
as is currently the case with residential, it’s a way for the
tenant to quickly secure a tenancy.
But not so in
retail; it’s not normal circumstances. So unless the property is in
a highly desirable location, commercial landlords may be coerced into
agreeing more tenant friendly terms: lower rents, monthly payments
instead of quarterly, short leases, or as in WHSmiths case, payments
in arrears. These demands will undoubtedly put landlords themselves
under more financial pressure.
According to the
Sunday Times, WHSmith already pays rent in arrears on several
large high street stores, and secured rent cuts averaging 35% on
leases renewed last year. Given the continuing tough trading
conditions and the shrinkage of many retailers estates, competitors
are likely to follow suit with cash saving demands on landlords.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – It’s a renters market, is the “tail wagging the Commercial Landlord’s dog?” | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: It’s a renters market, is the “tail wagging the Commercial Landlord’s dog?”
RLA responds to South Tyneside licensing proposals
The RLA has opposed plans to introduce a selective licensing scheme in South Tyneside. South Tyneside Council wants to implement the scheme for all private rented properties in the wards of Beacon and Bents, Simonside and Rekendyke ward and the Westoe ward. The Council say the purpose of the scheme is to improve the management […]
The post RLA responds to South Tyneside licensing proposals appeared first on RLA Campaigns and News Centre.
View Full Article: RLA responds to South Tyneside licensing proposals
Today in politics: PRS and the ‘Blue Wall’ and Universal Credit
We examine new research showing PRS rents are substantially lower in ‘Blue Wall’ constituencies and Labour concerns about ‘one-week shortfall’ under Universal Credit. The PRS and the Blue Wall The Resolution Foundation has published a report on ‘Blue Wall’ constituencies, those traditionally Labour seats that fell to the Conservatives at the 2019 General Election. It reports: […]
The post Today in politics: PRS and the ‘Blue Wall’ and Universal Credit appeared first on RLA Campaigns and News Centre.
View Full Article: Today in politics: PRS and the ‘Blue Wall’ and Universal Credit
BREAKING: Welsh government drops notice period bombshell on landlords
An amendment to the looming Renting Homes (Wales) Act will, if passed by the Welsh Assembly, triple the notice period a tenant must be given to six months.
The Welsh Assembly has
dropped a bombshell on the country’s landlords after housing minister Julie
James yesterday introduced proposed legislation that will extend the minimum
notice period from two to six months.
She wants tenants to be given
much more time to get ready to leave a property after a landlord has decided to
take repossession via a ‘no fault’ Section 21 eviction, particularly if they
have children in a local school, are in ill health or want to find a property
to rent nearby.
The changes are understood to
also be a gesture to campaigning groups such as Shelter, which has been running
a campaign in Wales to have ‘no fault’ evictions banned as they are due to be
in England.
Welsh Ministers are already
bringing in significant changes to the rental sector with the introduction of
the Renting Homes (Wales) Act which replaces the
secure tenancy and assured tenancy regimes which currently operate under the
Housing Act 1985 and Housing Act 1988 respectively.
The act has already been
passed in the Assembly but is not due to be enacted until later this year. This
amendment introduced yesterday is a modification of the act and will now be
debated by Assembly Members.
At the moment, Welsh
landlords must wait until six months have passed before they can serve notice
through a ‘no fault’ eviction but, if they have planned ahead and served an
unused Section 21 notice at the start of the tenancy, then evict a tenant.
If
the amendment is passed, a letting agent or landlord wishing to evict a tenant
via a no-fault notice will have to wait until six months has passed from the
beginning of the tenancy, serve notice and then wait for a further six months.
Read the official explanatory
note for the amendment in full.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – BREAKING: Welsh government drops notice period bombshell on landlords | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: BREAKING: Welsh government drops notice period bombshell on landlords
Rats thriving due to mild UK winters-top tips for landlords
Rats are thriving across the UK, the British Pest Control Association is warning, with milder winters to blame for the increase. The trade body has developed a new toolkit for landlords on what can be done to help prevent problems with rats. Here, we have put together some resources for landlords about what to do […]
The post Rats thriving due to mild UK winters-top tips for landlords appeared first on RLA Campaigns and News Centre.
View Full Article: Rats thriving due to mild UK winters-top tips for landlords
LATEST: Mystery continues to surround government’s flagship rogue landlord database
Government response to parliamentary written question reveals ministers still have no idea how many people are on it.
The government has admitted
that it has no idea how many people are listed within its much-heralded rogue
landlord database even though it has recently consulted on widening its remit.
Launched during Spring 2018,
the database has been a source of embarrassment for Ministers despite promises
that it would help councils share information on the estimated 10,500 rogue
landlords operating within the private rental market.
In August 2019 personal
finance website This Is Money discovered that just 12 landlords had been added
to the database during its 16 month life after making a Freedom of Information
request to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
Last year Housing Secretary
Robert Jenrick revealed that the list, which remains closed to public scrutiny,
will soon be opened up to tenants to check prospective landlords.
A consultation on the
proposals ended in October last year and a decision is pending.
In an attempt to move things
along, Conservative MP for Christchurch Christopher Chope yesterday tabled a
question to Jenrick asking “how many landlords in England are registered on the Government’s
rogue database; and what his estimate is of the number of rogue landlords
who are not yet registered”?
Jenrick enlisted
his housing minister Esther Mcvey to answer the query, who said it would not be
possible to answer it “within the usual time period” and that an “answer is
being prepared and will be provided as soon as it is available”.
As LandlordZONE reported last week, the Mayor of
London’s office has had more success making its rogue database public and, we
revealed, has fined landlords £4.5
million since it was established.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – LATEST: Mystery continues to surround government’s flagship rogue landlord database | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: LATEST: Mystery continues to surround government’s flagship rogue landlord database
Exclusive: Furious landlords condemn Leicestershire council’s green light for huge Selective Licensing scheme
Oadby and Wigston Borough Council says its new scheme will include 90 streets and rake in £504,000 to fund the scheme.
Landlords in Leicestershire are
calling on their local council to rethink a major new selective licensing
scheme.
Despite concerns from property owners in the town, Oadby
and Wigston Borough Council has given the green light to a scheme covering 90
streets in the South Wigston area, with the aim of improving private rental
accommodation where almost one in three privately rented properties fails to
meet the decent home standard.
However,
the Leicester Landlords Association has told LandlordZONE that the scheme will
just be a money-making exercise which won’t tackle the real cause of the area’s
high crime rate and anti-social behaviour.
“The
council doesn’t have enough people employed to implement the scheme properly so
they’ll make money, but things will just get worse,” says chairman Tony Bhaur.
“Some
landlords don’t realise when criminals have taken over their properties and
turned them into HMOs, which is when there are more problems.”
The
association believes a compulsory accreditation scheme would be more effective,
with a thorough survey of who lives in each rented property to flush out any
problems along with rogue landlords.
With 600 chargeable properties in the area, the new
scheme has the potential to generate £504,000 a year through the £590 licence.
Tony
Cawthorne, regulatory services manager for the council, estimates that 85% of
landlords will sign up – with time being allocated for officers to track down
and prosecute those that don’t.
“This
will give us more powers – it will be a way for good landlords to help us root
out the bad and the rogue landlords,” he says.
The scheme starts on 5th May 2020.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Exclusive: Furious landlords condemn Leicestershire council’s green light for huge Selective Licensing scheme | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Exclusive: Furious landlords condemn Leicestershire council’s green light for huge Selective Licensing scheme
Landlords accused of misleading tenants over energy switching
A survey of 1,800 tenants found that 13% had been told wrongly by their landlord or letting agent that they couldn’t switch utility providers.
More than one in 10 private renters have been wrongly told that
they’re not allowed to switch energy provider, costing them an average of £316
a year.
The research,from auto-switching energy service
Migrate, found that despite paying the energy bill, 13% – more than 200,000
households – had been told by their landlord or letting agent that they weren’t
allowed to switch provider.
Migrate says it’s likely that the perceived hassle or past bad
experiences are making some landlords prefer that all their tenants stay with
the same provider.
“It’s
understandable that some landlords may get frustrated with renters switching
suppliers before leaving the property, leaving them to do to the legwork after
they have moved out – especially if you have a larger rental portfolio,” says
Migrate CEO George Chalmers.
“That
said, we think helping tenants understand their rights to switch could be a
positive opportunity for communication between landlords and their tenants,
which could help build better relationships and longer tenancies.”
The survey of 1,800 bill-paying UK renters also uncovered a huge
amount of misunderstanding among private tenants in relation to energy bills as
53% didn’t think they could switch.
Adds Chalmers: “Despite what some tenants have
been told, if a tenant is responsible for the utility bill, and pays their
energy supplier directly for their energy, they have the right to switch to a
provider of their choosing, regardless of whether the landlord has a ‘preferred
supplier’.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Landlords accused of misleading tenants over energy switching | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Landlords accused of misleading tenants over energy switching
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (12,638)
Archives
- April 2026 (63)
- March 2026 (72)
- February 2026 (55)
- January 2026 (52)
- December 2025 (62)
- August 2025 (51)
- July 2025 (51)
- June 2025 (49)
- May 2025 (50)
- April 2025 (48)
- March 2025 (54)
- February 2025 (51)
- January 2025 (52)
- December 2024 (55)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Why some North West family homes are attracting stronger demand than landlords expect
- Selling with tenants in place may be easier than you think
- James Cleverley blames Labour’s Renters’ Rights Act after receiving Section 21 notice
- Landlords reducing exposure as regulatory pressure reshapes behaviour
- Sky News Section 21 story suggests a deeper problem to me

admin