Landlords face tougher penalties as rent repayment orders expanded
Property118

Landlords face tougher penalties as rent repayment orders expanded
The government has announced changes to rent repayment orders under the Renters’ Rights Act.
New changes include offences for providing false information to the Private Rented Sector (PRS) Database and knowingly or recklessly misusing a possession ground.
The news comes after the government published a list of civil financial penalties, under which landlords could be fined up to £6,000 for discriminating against those on benefits and children.
The maximum amount of rent a landlord can be ordered to repay will double from 12 to 24 months
A rent repayment order is a mechanism where a landlord who has committed an offence can be ordered to repay an amount of rent to the tenant or local authority.
The Renters’ Rights Act guidance, says the Act will extend rent repayment orders which will now include: “To the offences of knowingly or recklessly misusing a possession ground, breach of a restriction on letting or marketing a dwelling-house, continued tenancy reform breach after imposition of a financial penalty, continued breach of landlord redress scheme regulations after imposition of a financial penalty for this breach, provision of false information to the PRS Database when purporting to comply with PRS Database regulations and continued failure to register with the PRS Database after imposition of a financial penalty for this breach.”
Under the new rules, the maximum amount of rent a landlord can be ordered to repay will double from 12 to 24 months. The period in which a tenant or a council can apply for a rent repayment order after an offence has been committed will also be extended from 12 to 24 months.
Rent repayment orders will also apply to superior landlords and company directors, which the government says will “ensure criminal rent-to-rent arrangements can be properly held to account”.
Crack down on repeat offenders
The government has also announced that landlords who have previously been subject to enforcement action for an offence will be required to pay the maximum rent repayment order amount if they commit the same offence again, in a move the government say will crack down on repeat offenders.
The government guidance says: “Where a landlord has been convicted of or received a financial penalty for licensing offences or any of the relevant offences across the Act, they will be required to pay the maximum rent repayment order amount.
“This will ensure the deterrent effect is equally strong across all listed offences and that the deterrent effect is increased for the offences to which this provision did not previously apply.”
Property118 commercial reality check
Many landlords will read this and feel the ground shifting again beneath their feet. That reaction is understandable. The rules are expanding, the penalties are heavier and the margin for error is narrowing. None of this reflects badly on landlords who already act responsibly. It reflects a policy environment that increasingly assumes bad faith and then regulates accordingly.
What landlords should do next
Protect yourself against misunderstanding, not just misconduct. Keep written evidence explaining why possession grounds are used, even when the reason feels obvious. The risk now sits as much in interpretation as in behaviour.
Prepare for the PRS Database before it exists. Even though the database is not yet operational, begin aligning tenancy records, licensing details and ownership information now. When registration becomes mandatory, readiness will matter more than speed.
Clarify accountability across all arrangements. Where companies, directors or superior landlords are involved, document control and responsibility clearly. This is preparation, not admission of fault.
The post Landlords face tougher penalties as rent repayment orders expanded appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Landlords face tougher penalties as rent repayment orders expanded
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (12,373)
Archives
- December 2025 (39)
- August 2025 (51)
- July 2025 (51)
- June 2025 (49)
- May 2025 (50)
- April 2025 (48)
- March 2025 (54)
- February 2025 (51)
- January 2025 (52)
- December 2024 (55)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords face tougher penalties as rent repayment orders expanded
- Share of Freehold company in a real mess?
- Landlords risk fines, bans and bankruptcy – The answer?
- Tenants prioritise EPC ratings when choosing a home
- Government calls on landlords to upgrade homes ahead of Decent Homes Standard

admin