Council plans tougher fines for landlords housing vulnerable tenants
Property118

Council plans tougher fines for landlords housing vulnerable tenants
A council has been accused of setting a “worrying precedent” over plans to propose large fines for rule-breaking landlords housing vulnerable tenants, a story in The Telegraph claims.
Bristol City Council has proposed in a consultation that landlords who breach safety standards when housing vulnerable tenants would face a 20% premium added to the financial penalty, meaning landlords would be forced to pay £14,400.
The news comes after the Green-controlled council consultation is also asking renters to help decide how much it will fine landlords who breach rules under the Renters’ Rights Act.
Endless escalation of fines
According to The Telegraph, the council claims the definition of a vulnerable tenant will be non-exhaustive and will include young adults and children, people with drug or alcohol addictions, those whose first language is not English, asylum seekers, and people on a low income.
The council also plans to fine landlords an additional 10% if they charge rent above the level set by the Local Housing Allowance (LHA).
The Telegraph reports that under the council’s plans, a landlord who failed to fix a roof causing damp and mould by a specified deadline would face a £13,000 penalty. However, if they charged tenants above LHA rates, they would be required to pay £14,300.
However, industry experts have warned the council’s plans could create chaos for landlords and cause a lack of supply.
Paul Shamplina, founder of Landlord Action, told The Telegraph: “Landlords must comply with safety and licensing laws, but the penalty premium would create an endless escalation of fines.
“Measures like this could further reduce the supply of landlords willing to accommodate vulnerable tenants, particularly in cities such as Bristol, where homelessness levels are already high and social housing is in short supply. It sets a worrying precedent.”
Criminalise landlords unnecessarily
Sean Hooker, of dispute adjudicator Property Redress, said fining landlords was not the answer.
He told The Telegraph: “If penalties are seen as excessive, we are likely to see more appeals, leading to delay and additional cost for enforcement bodies.
“The purpose of these powers is to raise standards and ensure compliance, not to criminalise landlords unnecessarily.
“In many cases, working with a landlord and encouraging investment to upgrade a property will deliver a better outcome for tenants than simply imposing the maximum fine.”
Under the Renters’ Rights Act, councils now have the power to carry out surprise inspections, including entering premises where tenancy records are kept with or without a warrant.
Councils can also compel landlords, letting agents, and third parties (e.g., prop tech companies, banks, accountants, contractors) to provide documents and information related to housing compliance.
Councils will also be able to issue fines of up to £40,000, and the government has released new civil penalty tables. These include a £12,000 fine for operating a property in a selective licensing area without the correct licence.
Property118 has approached Bristol city council for comment.
The post Council plans tougher fines for landlords housing vulnerable tenants appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Council plans tougher fines for landlords housing vulnerable tenants
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (12,503)
Archives
- February 2026 (55)
- January 2026 (52)
- December 2025 (62)
- August 2025 (51)
- July 2025 (51)
- June 2025 (49)
- May 2025 (50)
- April 2025 (48)
- March 2025 (54)
- February 2025 (51)
- January 2025 (52)
- December 2024 (55)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Government admits no impact assessment of Renters’ Rights Act on supply
- Council plans tougher fines for landlords housing vulnerable tenants
- John Lewis exits Build-to-Rent housing projects
- Potentially Exempt Transfer insurance / Gift inter vivos policies
- Why Landlords Are Taking Time to Plan Before They Act

admin