Landlords now charging rents for pets…
Lets for Pets:
The introduction of the tenant fees ban has also introduced uncertainties for landlords and tenants around the issue of letting with pets.                                                                                Â
Letting to families or individuals with pets has always been
a controversial issue for both landlords and tenants. Some landlords would prefer
not to let to tenants with pets full-stop, but an outright ban on pets is
illegal.
However, a landlord has the right to refuse pets when they
would be deemed unsuitable for the accommodation or the lifestyle of the
tenants. For instance, a dog being left unattended in a flat for long periods
may interfere unreasonably with neighbours’ lives.
Depending on the pet, wear and tear may be increased
considerably, and it’s difficult to assess in advance if this will be the case.
A cat can cause scratching to furniture and horrendous smells when urinating on
carpets, which would necessitate full replacements. Replacement costs can be
considerable and something which can become a big issue between landlord and
tenant.
For these reasons, landlords have traditionally accepted
increased deposits to cover for increased risks and they have separate pet agreements
which contractually bind the owners, not only to pay for any additional damage
caused and cleaning costs, but also to ensure that animals are properly looked
after, including proper exercise, all injections, worming, de-fleaing etc.
The fees ban puts a cap on deposits which prevents landlords
taking an additional amount for pets, and also bans cleaning fees, which leaves
the only legal option of charging an additional amount of rent – in effect a “pet
rentâ€� – for the increased risk.
The Guardian
newspaper has identified what it says is an attempt to “recoup losses from a
ban on unfair letting fees,� by landlords charging excessive “pet rents� of hundreds
of pounds a year for the thousands of tenants who own a cat or a dog.
The Guardian says
the “new practice means tenants with animals are being charged up to £50 a
month additional rent for a single pet, adding considerably to the cost of
housing at a time when more and more families are priced out of buying and rely
on rented homes.�
The newspaper cites one landlord from Bicester in Oxfordshire asking £40 per pet per month on top of the £995 pcm rent, meaning that (in theory) a family with a dog and two cats would face paying and additional £1,400 per annum. Several other landlords are said to be seeking “pet rent� for “clawed� pets only.
One tenant is cited by The Guardian as saying it is ridiculous for landlords / agents to ask for pet references, when in fact the DogsTrust recommends this practice – see http://www.letswithpets.org.uk/find-a-pet-friendly-property/top-ten-tips
Letting agents are saying that the “pet rent� issue is one
that has emerged since June when the fees ban came in and one which it seems is
likely to be a cause of contention between landlords and tenants in the future.
One of the unintended consequences of introducing new legislation perhaps, and
an issue which may need to be addressed in the legislation?
David Cox, chief executive of ARLA Propertymark, has
commented that the practice of charging pet rents is the only legal way for
landlords to cover the potential cost of damage by pets.
“This practice is a direct result of capping deposits under
the tenant fees ban, as this problem didn’t exist before June 1.
“There’s been a long-standing campaign from the Dogs Trust,
called Lets with Pets, which encouraged landlords and letting agents to take a
couple of weeks extra deposit to cover the cost of a pet.
“But this practice is now unlawful under the ban and
landlords are charging additional rent as it’s the only lawful avenue to
mitigate the risk of damage from pets.�
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Landlords now charging rents for pets… | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Landlords now charging rents for pets…
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,864)
Archives
- November 2024 (55)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Why Southwark Council’s Attack on Letting Agents Is Misguided
- Why the Buy-to-Let Dream is Dead: How the Government Killed the UK’s Best Investment
- NRLA blast Housing Minister’s court system remarks
- Why Do You Really Want to Invest in Property?
- Demand for accessible rental homes surges – LRG