Law Society backs government’s controversial eviction law reforms
Main organisation representing lawyers in the UK says plans will increase tenant security but makes no mention of likely backlogs it will create within court system.
The Law Society has backed the government’s controversial plans to significantly reform evictions laws in England.
Despite howls of protest from landlord and many industry organisations pointing out that banning Section 21 notice evictions will lead to huge backlogs as more evictions are pushed into the court system, The Law Society has said the proposals will ‘improve security of tenure’.
The announcement it its response to the government’s A New Deal for Renting consultation on ending assured shorthold tenancies (ASTs) and revoking section 21 of the Housing Act 1988.
The Law Society’s views echo many of the government’s arguments for abolishing ‘no fault’ Section 21 evictions.
“Section 21 is one of the leading causes of family homelessness in the UK,” says Simon Davis, president of the Law Society.
“In addition, because of the absence of legal aid support, many are unable to obtain the legal advice they need to enforce their rights.
“This creates an inequity of power between landlords and tenants. The rule of law should be available equally to both sides.”
But Paul Shamplina of evictions
specialist Landlord Action, says although increased tenant security is to be
welcomed, the reforms must be backed up by additional funding for the court system.
“It’s very important that tenants have more security in their tenancies, and clearly when section 21 is abolished, there will be major amendments to a Section 8 notice, with extra grounds added to the current 17, which are out date in my opinion.
“But we have still not heard anything from the Ministry of Justice that there will be extra resource put in the court system.
This must include employing more judges, bailiffs and more online tools to assist landlords and tenants, along with a new mediation service, to prevent cases going to hearing/eviction stage.
“Without extra
resource to deal with all these extra hearings from the switch of Section 21,
it falls down.
“We still see
horrendous delays on cases at present at Landlord Action.
“’ve said it once
and I will say it again, if landlords feel they cannot obtain possession within
a reasonable time period, they will have no confidence in new ‘Housing Court’
and you will see landlords exit the market, which will result in more
homelessness and reduced stock in the PRS.
“It needs to be
joined up and not rushed.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Law Society backs government’s controversial eviction law reforms | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Law Society backs government’s controversial eviction law reforms
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,917)
Archives
- December 2024 (44)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords could pay tenants up to two years’ rent for failing Decent Homes Standard as PBSA is exempt
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025