Critic and former pupil of Samuel Leeds receives legal warnings via the property guru’s legal team
Andrew Burgess, a former student of property trainer Samuel Leeds who says he wants to highlight the guru’s activities after attending several of his courses, has been served with a letter from a law firm asking him to delete all the social media sites that he controls.
These are the well-known Facebook group The Truth About Samuel Leeds and also Burgess’ Property Education Truth Seeker channel on Youtube.
The letter warns that his ‘campaign’ against Leeds is both defamatory and constitutes harassment and that Burgess has made false allegations against Leeds, and incited others to do so. It also accuses him of ‘malicious communication’ after Burgess contacted several former Leeds students.
The legal spat is the latest in a long-running campaign by Leeds to tackle Burgess and other critics of his property investment strategies, methods which are promoted tirelessly on the internet and social media by the guru via his property academy, Property Investors.
Mishcon de Reya
In February this year Burgess was served with a similar ‘cease and desist’ letter from another legal firm, Mishcon de Reya, which informed Burgess that he had been reported to the police, although Burgess claims no further legal action or police investigation has subsequently materialised.
As LandlordZONE, several national newspapers, the BBC and other media outlets have reported in the past, the key criticisms of Leeds and his many copycats is that their courses attempt to teach inexperienced members of the public how to make a ‘passive income’ with ‘no money down’.
These include Rent to Rent and Lease Option agreements, joint ventures, serviced accommodation packaging and deal sourcing – even though these require amazing sales skills, local contacts and property sector experience and knowledge, attributes many of his student do not possess. His courses start at £995 but can cost up to £12,000.
Burgess has told LandlordZONE that he is not phased by the letters that Leeds’ legal representatives continue to send him, and he intends to ignore them as he has done in the past.
“I have asked my solicitor to look at them and have been assured there is no legal basis for their claims or demands,” he says. “They are just an attempt to cower me into silence.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Critic and former pupil of Samuel Leeds receives legal warnings via the property guru’s legal team | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Critic and former pupil of Samuel Leeds receives legal warnings via the property guru’s legal team
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’