Can important documents like tenancy contracts be signed electronically?
In these days of lock-down it would be very convenient and timely to accept documents relating to tenancies and other business contracts that have been signed electronically and transmitted electronically, rather than using the usual face-to-face signing and exchange using pen and ink.
But just how legal are these e-signatures on a document, and more importantly how would electronic signatures stand-up in court? Would you be prepared to accept a tenancy agreement attached to an email with an electronic (typed) signature on it?
This article applies primarily to English law. Although tenancy laws are similar in other jurisdictions, there may be significant differences. Always seek professional advice before making or not making important decisions.
Yes, says the law, electronic signatures are perfectly legal because today we have something called the Electronic Communications Act 2000 (and eIDAS in the European Union, NIST-DSS in the USA or ZertES in Switzerland)., all of which clarify the situation somewhat. Even so, many people would still be quite apprehensive about accepting documents signed in this way, especially if they are from the older generation – the younger generations of course are far more accepting of new technology and instant communications via email and text.
To quote directly from the EC Act: Electronic signatures and related certificates.
(1) In any legal proceedings—
(a) an electronic signature incorporated into or logically associated with a particular electronic communication or particular electronic data, and
(b) the certification by any person of such a signature, shall each be admissible in evidence in relation to any question as to the authenticity of the communication or data or as to the integrity of the communication or data.
(2) For the purposes of this section an electronic signature is so much of anything in electronic form as—
(a) is incorporated into or otherwise logically associated with any electronic communication or electronic data; and
(b) purports to be used by the individual creating it to sign.
(3) For the purposes of this section an electronic signature incorporated into or associated with a particular electronic communication or particular electronic data is certified by any person if that person (whether before or after the making of the communication) has made a statement confirming that—
(a) the signature,
(b) a means of producing, communicating or verifying the signature, or
(c) a procedure applied to the signature, is (either alone or in combination with other factors) a valid means of signing.
Quite clearly the electronic signature has legal standing providing certain other requirements are met, most particularly that a confirmation statement is made, the parties are identified and the document is date-stamped, which it would be in any case if accompanied by an e-mail audit trail as evidence of receipt.
Ironically, the accommodating audit trail could give more certainty to the signature and the intentions of the parties than would a traditional pen and ink signature. That’s because a tenants can and sometimes do deny they have signed a document, and faced with this, unless other supporting evidence is available, such as a witness statement, any judge would err on the side of caution and take the tenant’s word.
Although there are third party signature services such as those offered by Adobe, which act as a sort of independent escrow service, this is not necessary for one offs, and it would be usual for landlords to send documents attached to an email on which the tenant/s can either upload a facsimile signature, or simply type one.
The key to this is that common sense is required. So long as the process used generates a clear audit trail showing the intentions of the parties, based on the electronic communications between them leading up to the agreement signing, and that dates are clearly stated – it’s advisable to type out a date in full so that, even thought the email is electronically dated, the date on the documents cannot be doctored. For example, instead of 19/06/20 write The 19th of June, 2020
The exception to all this is where a document needs a witness. For example, tenancies of more than three years and guarantor agreements must be prepared and signed as a deed with a witness statement and signature. Witness statements therefore cannot be signed electronically.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Can important documents like tenancy contracts be signed electronically? | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Can important documents like tenancy contracts be signed electronically?
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’