‘Build-to-Rent doesn’t cherry pick posh tenants’ insists leading figure
The boss of a build-to-rent (BTR) property search website has insisted the sector is not out to only attract more affluent tenants, despite criticism in the past that it does.
Love to Rent founder Anne-Marie Brown (main picture) says that as private landlords leave the market, BTR can help meet demand. “There’s a BTR property for a range of budgets,” she tells LandlordZONE.
“People are looking for quality, secure homes – there’s not so much security and tech in the standard private rented sector.
“Investors maintain BTR properties to a great standard, keep up with technology and want customer loyalty whereas private landlords might not be able to do that.”
To illustrate this, its website activity has increased by 53% in the last year, while the number of families searching for BTR homes has jumped by 509%.
Brown says there’s a growing pipeline of BTR properties and increasingly, family homes in suburban areas; the sector grew by 9% between Q1 2022 and Q1 2023, with the regional market growing at double the pace of London (12% and 6% respectively) as the concept stretches beyond young professionals in urban settings.
‘Customers’
She tells LandlordZONE that tenants in these developments particularly appreciate having confidence in a brand so are happy to move to one of their homes in a different city, while shared spaces create a much more positive experience for customers.
“When this is combined with all the practical elements that build-to-rent offers, it is no surprise that interest in the sector is growing,” she adds.
The platform hopes to spread the word about the sector’s benefits with the third Love to Rent week from 25th–29th September. It will push the message that BTR is managed by professional landlords, meaning that “difficulties and challenges are mostly avoided”.
Read more: what does BTR mean for BTL?
View Full Article: ‘Build-to-Rent doesn’t cherry pick posh tenants’ insists leading figure
Official ‘repairs tool’ launches to help tenants fight landlords and agents
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has launched a tool that helps tenants take on landlords or letting agents who are failing to repair or maintain properties to the required standard.
Called ‘How to get repairs done in your rented home’ it takes those renting privately through a Q&A and then tells them how to either contact their local council, get more information about their rights or seek legal aid to take their landlord to court.
HFIS mediation expert Julie Ford (picture) says this tool, which is hot on the heels of a new free court service that offers tenants but not landlords help when fighting evictions, is part of a trend.
“It feels like the Gov are sneaking these new tools under the radar on purpose – it is all becoming very ‘pro-tenant’ with a stealth-like advance following on from [the Government’s] recent anti-landlord rhetoric”,” she says.
The new MoJ tool takes tenants through approximately ten questions depending on their circumstances to find out if they are subject to a ‘revenge eviction’ after requesting repairs, whether their health has been affected, how urgent the problem is, whether they are at risk of eviction and whether they’ve stopped paying the rent – something the MoJ advises them not to do.
Although the MoJ website doesn’t say so, it’s clear the initiative is part of the Government’s attempts to improve conditions within both the private and public housing sectors following the tragic death of toddler Awaab Ishaak last year, who lived in a council home affected by mould and whose landlord had failed to maintain the property adequately.
Read more: how to tackle mould if you're a landlord.
Sean Hooker (pictured) who heads up the Property Redress Scheme, says: “This could be a useful tool to help tenants access the help they need.
“But it has launched with little fanfare during the holiday period, so it needs some serious publicity to be effective.
“While it signposts a tenant to where they can get help right now, what is needed is for the plans to set up a private rented sector ombudsman and redress for repairs to be put in place as quickly as possible.”
Try the tool.
View Full Article: Official ‘repairs tool’ launches to help tenants fight landlords and agents
Landlords to pay £32,000 fines as big councils clamp down
Landlords have been fined more than £32,000 for letting unlicensed HMOs and failing to improve unsafe properties so far this week.
Three landlords in Walsall were handed fines totalling more than £20,000 after being charged with letting unlicensed HMOs and ignoring fire safety and electrical hazards.
The fourth landlord was fined for not having an electrical safety certificate at his rented property. Walsall Council reports that all landlords have now addressed the problems.
Last September, the authority introduced its additional licensing scheme for the Pleck, Palfrey, St Matthews and Paddock wards and has now extended it to Bentley and Darlaston North, Birchills Leamore, Blakenall, Darlaston South and Willenhall South.
More fines
Meanwhile, in Bridlington, the landlord of a five-storey block of flats has been ordered to pay £12,377 for failing to ensure the property was safe for tenants. London-based Gedulah Ltd employed a management company to oversee 2 The Crescent (main picture) but did not do basic repairs or make adequate management arrangements.
East Riding of Yorkshire Council’s private sector housing team found the property had inadequate heating and insulation, damp and mould, unrestricted low-level opening windows, a faulty fire alarm and lack of door locks on the main entrance.
The company admitted two counts of failing to comply with improvement notices and was ordered to pay a total of £12,377 at Beverley Magistrates Court.
Dangerous hazards
Chris Dunnachie, the council’s private sector housing manager, says officers tried unsuccessfully to work with the landlord to rectify the dangerous hazards in its rental properties.
He adds: “The council does, and will continue to, take robust action when the safety of tenants is put at risk due to serious hazards from the properties they are living in.”
View Full Article: Landlords to pay £32,000 fines as big councils clamp down
Council that threatened PRS landlords to pay £5,400 compensation to tenant
Just days after threatening private rented sector (PRS) landlords with taking control of properties they don’t license and look after; a council has been told to pay a tenant £5,400 in compensation.
The Housing Ombudsman announced the payment for prolonged damp and mould neglect in a home –
View Full Article: Council that threatened PRS landlords to pay £5,400 compensation to tenant
Tribunal system is ‘not fair and weighted towards tenants’ warns landlord
A landlord who’s being threatened with a massive rent repayment order has told of his frustration at a court system that is unfairly weighted towards tenants.
Dan Jarvis’s mother is due to appear at a London First Tier Property Tribunal later this month, accused of withholding her former tenants’ deposit, but Jarvis explains he’s determined to make it clear that his family wasn’t at fault.
“These four tenants lived in our three-bedroom flat for three years and moved out a couple of years ago,” he tells LandlordZONE.
“When they left, we found they had totally trashed the house, leaving bed bugs, cigarette burns in carpets and ruined kitchen worktops.
“We were faced with a bill of more than £11,000 for all the repairs. Obviously, we weren’t going to pay back their £2,250 deposit.”
The tenants first – incorrectly and unsuccessfully – alleged that their landlord hadn’t protected their deposit but are now claiming a rent repayment order of £24,000.
They say no repairs were carried out during the time they lived there, which was why the house was in such a bad state.
Blackmailing
“My family could have just quietly given them the deposit back to try and prevent them from going to the tribunal, but we felt strongly that they were blackmailing us for the money and wanted to defend ourselves,” adds Jarvis.
“We’re lucky that we have other properties, so are able to pay for a defence, which has already cost about £10,000, but we want to raise the issue as it’s particularly hard on landlords with only one property who can’t afford legal fees.
“Even if you win as a landlord, you can’t claim your costs back, while a tenant can use a no-win, no-fee solicitor – it’s simply not fair.”
The landlords comments are particularly worrying as the Government says it wants to use the Tribunal system to give tenants more rights to challenge rent increases.
Read a guide to landlord fines including rent repayment orders.
View Full Article: Tribunal system is ‘not fair and weighted towards tenants’ warns landlord
Government should step in now to help renters – Generation Rent
A tenant activist group says the government needs to step in and help renters and put in place long-term solutions to the housing crisis – including the unfreezing of Local Housing Allowance (LHA).
The call comes from Generation Rent after the housing charity Shelter warned that 51% of tenants are ‘just one pay cheque away’
View Full Article: Government should step in now to help renters – Generation Rent
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’