Mockery of hunting landlords
This Makes an absolute mockery of their hunting for landlords to place on their ‘rogue’ database that they now plan to give the public access to.
There have only been 10 Landlords put on so far!
When will they learn
The post Mockery of hunting landlords appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Mockery of hunting landlords
Brokenshire to stamp out ‘poor doors’
New measures to tackle stigma and help end the segregation of social housing residents in mixed-tenure developments have been unveiled by Communities Secretary James Brokenshire. The move aims to stamp out so-called “poor doors� where entrances for social housing residents stigmatise and divide them from other residents in the development and other forms of segregation
The post Brokenshire to stamp out ‘poor doors’ appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Brokenshire to stamp out ‘poor doors’
‘A new deal for renting’ – Section 21 consultation
The Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government have now published details of its consultation into views on implementing the highly controversial decision to ban Section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 and improving section 8 eviction grounds. The consultation closes 11:45pm on 12/10/19.
The post ‘A new deal for renting’ – Section 21 consultation appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: ‘A new deal for renting’ – Section 21 consultation
Tenants are not evicted for no reason
The RLA has conducted its most wide ranging landlord research yet concerning government announced plans to ban Section 21 so called ‘no fault’ evictions.
The research included feedback from over 6000 Private Landlords and strongly contradicts the Government
The post Tenants are not evicted for no reason appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Tenants are not evicted for no reason
Make Sure You Insure What’s Behind the Door – Shocking episode of Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords
I think viewers of this
week’s episode of ‘Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords’ will find it hard to believe
that the damage to a property in Cardiff was caused by just one person.
Of course, the show
highlights some of the more extreme cases of bad landlord and tenant behaviour,
but it is also a stark reminder that this can happen to anyone. If you don’t have landlord insurance specifically
covering Malicious Damage, or the skills to repair the damage yourself like builders
Stuart and Steve in this week’s case, the outcome could be even more costly and
distressing.
Earlier in the year my
team received a call from Stuart Haines. Stuart and his best friend Steve are seasoned
landlords with a combined portfolio of 30 properties. As builders who have
worked together for 15 years, they have renovated and let many properties, but
never had they experienced anything like this…and in all honesty, it even shocked
me.
Stuart and Steve let one
of their properties in Cardiff, but after 4 months they stopped receiving rent. With the tenant subsequently denying them
access to carry out necessary maintenance, they called on us at Landlord Action
to help. Getting possession of the property seemed easy in comparison to what
we were faced with when we entered the property.
There wasn’t a single
room in the property that hadn’t been vandalised. Not only were there belongings
everywhere, anything and everything that once made up this property had been
damaged, including a shattered sink, broken tiles, hammer holes in the walls, doors
hanging off, cigarette burns all over the floor and graffiti writing throughout
the property. There were also pigeon feathers everywhere in the property. The pictures
speak for themselves and viewers will see the full extent on tonight’s show –
watch my face!
The costs faced by Stuart and Steve totalled more than £25,000, made up
of £5,000 rent arrears, £2,000 in court fees and £20,000 to repair and
refurbish the property.
Although the pair are in a more fortunate position than most since they
have the skills to put the property back together, they feel let down by the
system which allowed a vulnerable tenant with mental health issues to reside in
their property.
Steve said “We are in a fortunate enough position that we have a
property portfolio to buffer some of the expense we have incurred and since we
are builders, the condition of the flat does not put us off. However, I believe
for many an experience such as this would break them mentally and financially. Direct
payments from the council stopped because the tenant failed to fill out the
correct paperwork, but we are at a loss as to why we as landlords were
penalised when we continued to house the tenant.�
In contrast, our second case on this week’s show sees a seemingly professional
tenant turn out to be a nightmare for Jean Pierre Barakat and his wife after a
series of broken promises.
Jean Pierre has a property in Finchley, North London. Having given up a
career as a photographer to take care of his disabled on, Jean relies on his
income as a landlord to live. He let it to a privately educated individual who
worked in the city and was confident that the tenant had the means to cover the
rent.
As it turned out, the tenant could afford the rent, but instead was using the money (totaling £7,000-£8,000 arrears) to set up his own business. By complete coincidence, the tenant used to work for an old friend of mine, and after a long conversation between just him and I, he agreed to leave. Unfortunately, the relationship between the landlord and tenant had reached the point of no return resulting in threatening behaviour following an encounter at the property. Watch Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords on Channel 5, Monday at 9pm to find out what happens!
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Make Sure You Insure What’s Behind the Door – Shocking episode of Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Make Sure You Insure What’s Behind the Door – Shocking episode of Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords
Insure What’s Behind the Door: Shocking ‘Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords’
I think viewers of this week’s episode of ‘Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords’ will find it hard to believe that the damage to a property in Cardiff was caused by just one person.
Of course, the show highlights some of the more extreme cases of bad landlord and tenant behaviour
The post Insure What’s Behind the Door: Shocking ‘Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords’ appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Insure What’s Behind the Door: Shocking ‘Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords’
Survey findings – 84% of private tenants are satisfied
Housing Survey:
The recently published English Housing Survey (EHS) for 2017-18 reports that private tenants in England are satisfied or very satisfied with their rented accommodation and the way they were being treated with their landlord or agent.
This is a national survey of people’s housing circumstances and the condition and energy efficiency of housing in England. It is perhaps the most comprehensive, credible and longest standing housing survey available, first run in 1967.
Some Statistics and Findings:
Aroundone-in-five
households (20%) in England live in the private rented sector, making renting
the second largest tenure after home ownership (64% or 14.8 million), with social
housing (17% or 4.0 million) lower than the private sector – 4.5 million
households now live in the private rented sector in England.
The majority (84%)
of private tenants report that they are satisfied or very satisfied with their current
accommodation, which compares to 95% of owner occupiers.
In comparison to social
renters and owner occupiers, private renters spend the highest proportion of
their income on housing. Despite this, the majority said they found it easy to
pay their rent.
On average, private
renters spent a third (33%) of their household income (including Housing
Benefit) on rent. This is compares to 28% for social renters, and 17% for
mortgage payers.
The proportion of
household income spent on rent was higher for private renters in London, on
average 42%, than for the rest of England averaging 30%.
Most private renters
(71%) said they found it easy or very easy to pay their rent.
One fifth of private
renters (20%) were receiving Housing Benefit (HB) and for most recipients (85%)
said that the HB does not cover their whole rent.
Around three
quarters (76%) of private renters paid a deposit at the start of their current
tenancy, and most deposits paid were equivalent to the value of four or more
weeks’ rent.
Around three
quarters (73%) of deposit payers said they knew their deposit had been
protected in one of the Government authorised tenancy deposit protection
schemes, whereas 20% did not know.
Most private rented
sector tenancies ended because the tenant/s wanted to move out.
Of those who had
lived in their current home for less than three years, 72% moved house because
they wanted to. The main reasons for moving in the past three years were job
related (18% of moves), moving to a better neighbourhood (16%) and moves to a
larger home (13%).
Of those who did not
move solely by choice, reasons included:
- move instigated
by a landlord (12%), - moving
on mutual agreement with a landlord (10%), - moving at
the end of a fixed term tenancy (8%).
Nearly two thirds of
private renters (63%) reported having no savings. Just over a third (37%) of
private renters reported having some savings. 11% had savings of £16,000 or
more.
More than half of
private renters (58%) thought they would eventually buy a home. A sizeable
proportion of those who expected to buy did not currently have any savings.
Over half (58%) of
private renters thought they would eventually buy a home. Younger renters were
more likely to think they would eventually become home owners. 77% of those aged
16 to 24 thought they would buy, compared with 40% of those aged 45 to 64.
Of the 42% of
private renters who did not think they would eventually buy a home, most (68%)
said this was because they could not afford to do so.
There was no
apparent link between those who thought they would eventually buy a home, and
those who had substantial savings that could go towards a deposit: 12% of those
who eventually planned to buy had substantial savings of £16,000 or more.
Overall 42% of those who intend to buy had some savings.
Despite improvement
over time, privately rented homes were more likely to have indicators of poorer
housing quality and safety than other tenures.
The private rented
sector had the highest proportion of non-decent homes. In this 2017-18 survey,
25% of homes in the private rented sector were non-decent according to the
Decent Homes Standard. This is compares with 19% of owner occupied homes, and
13% of socially rented homes.
According to the
Housing Health and Safety Rating System, 14% of privately rented homes have at
least one Category 1 hazard, compared with 11% of owner occupied homes, and 6%
of those in the social rented sector.
Private renters were younger than those in other tenures.
The average age of private renters was 40 years, compared with 53 years for
social renters and 57 years for owner occupiers.
In 2017-18, 68% of main tenants in privately rented
households were under 45 years, compared with 35% of social renters and 24% of
owner occupiers.
Read the full report here
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Survey findings – 84% of private tenants are satisfied | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Survey findings – 84% of private tenants are satisfied
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,920)
Archives
- December 2024 (47)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- How Good Is Your Accountant? Essential Questions for Landlords
- NRLA slams Prime Minister for criticising landlords amid housing crisis
- Why choose The Home Insurer for landlord insurance?
- Landlords could pay tenants up to two years’ rent for failing Decent Homes Standard as PBSA is exempt
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want