Wily landlord wins licencing battle after standing up to city council
A canny landlord who stood up to council inspectors has successfully challenged a licence condition to install a new fire door at his student HMO.
Roger Braithwaite, a career and expert environmental health officer, was told by Coventry Council that he could only have a licence on the property in Cable Yard (pictured) for two instead of the normal five years.
The authority said this was due to his failure to submit a complete application in time, although the landlord explained he had had problems with the on-line process – and this complaint was partially upheld.
A First Tier Property Tribunal heard that the council also insisted that he fit a fire door at the bottom of the stairs leading to the kitchen.
However, Braithwaite argued that other similar properties in the yard did not have this requirement and stressed that safety standards in the house exceeded those required by HomeStamp Guidance, followed by the council.
An independent building engineer confirmed that the proposed fire door would constitute a breach of building regulations and cause an obstruction.
Not necessary
At the hearing, the council agreed that fire doors were not necessary but then demanded that the kitchen should be compartmentalised.
The tribunal accepted that the compartmentalisation of the kitchen including a door would obstruct the escape route and said it was satisfied the property met the general fire precautions.
It agreed with the landlord and ordered that the HMO licence should run for five years without conditions.
The judge added: “The late change of approach by the respondent [the council] was unsatisfactory and appeared to be something of a rear-guard action to justify its continued opposition to the applicant’s appeal.”
Read more about First Tier Property Tribunal decisions.
View Full Article: Wily landlord wins licencing battle after standing up to city council
1000s of ‘mortgage prisoner’ landlords still need help, says Martin Lewis
Mortgage prisoners – many of them landlords – should be offered free financial advice and interest-free equity loans from the government to prevent them from losing their properties, a new study suggests.
About 195,000 households are still trapped in expensive variable-rate mortgage products, mostly loans that were taken out before the financial crisis of 2007/08.
These mortgage prisoners borrowed from lenders such as Northern Rock and Bradford & Bingley who went under during the crisis, and whose closed book loans were sold to investment firms that don’t offer mortgage products.
While the borrowers can’t move to a better mortgage with their lender, many find it difficult or impossible to take out new loans with active lenders because they don’t fit the criteria of a viable borrower; they can’t, or don’t know how to, meet current affordability tests for new loans.
It’s estimated that prisoners could now be paying rates as high as 8% on their home loans.
An LSE study into mortgage prisoners, backed by Martin Lewis of MoneySavingExpert, explains that the cost in human terms is high.
“Borrowers face financial pressures that affect their health, and the current economic context means that without help, an increasing number will likely lose their homes,” it says.
“Those households who are still prisoners are the victims of circumstances that were not of their own making.”
Dramatically
The situation facing these mortgage prisoners has become dramatically more difficult, according to the report, whose authors suggest providing free comprehensive financial advice to all 195,000 closed book borrowers, and interest-free equity loans to clear the unsecured element of Northern Rock’s Together mortgage.
The government could offer an equity loan for a maximum of 40% of the value of the property in London and 20% elsewhere – similar to Help to Buy.
It adds: “These will hopefully enable a majority of prisoner households to make progress towards returning to the mainstream and active mortgage market.”
View Full Article: 1000s of ‘mortgage prisoner’ landlords still need help, says Martin Lewis
Landlords are quitting the PRS because of Government ‘indifference’
A property expert has slammed the government’s ‘indifference’ for the growing crisis in the private rented sector (PRS) as landlords flee and fewer investors step in.
That’s the view of Jonathan Rolande of the National Association of Property Buyers.
View Full Article: Landlords are quitting the PRS because of Government ‘indifference’
TV star to lead debate on ‘dramatic’ changes due in Renters Reform Bill
Readers concerned by the looming Renters Reform Bill should make their way to the National Landlord Investment Show on 14th March were Paul Shamplina will be leading a debate on its radical measures.
Panellists on the stage with him will include Richard Blanco from the NRLA, Julie Ford of tenancy consultancy Gothard Rowe, Sue Coulson of tenant finder service Capital Letters.
They will be talking about the multiple and dramatic changes that landlords, tenants and letting agents will face once the Bill becomes law, most likely later this year.
Although delayed, NRLA chief executive Ben Beadle this week said that the Bill is likely to enter parliament sooner rather than later, possibly before the Easter recess at the end of May.
12 proposals
Shamplina’s debate, which is taking place at Old Billingsgate in London at 2pm, will look at the 12 proposals already on the table within last June’s renting reform white paper.
This included plans to abolish Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions, limit rent rises to once a year, a single ombudsman for the sector, a national register of landlord properties, greater investigative powers for local councils and fixed-length ‘periodic’ tenancies.
The Government has said it will give landlords a six months’ grace period to adjust to the new measures once the Bill becomes law – so a hard compliance deadline in early 2024.
As well as hosting the debate, Shamplina is also appearing on several other panel sessions at the show, and hosting his own talk.
View Full Article: TV star to lead debate on ‘dramatic’ changes due in Renters Reform Bill
House prices in Scotland start to flatline
Scotland’s average house price is flattening – but some property types have not yet peaked, one firm of lettings and estate agents says.
DJ Alexander says that Land Registry data for last year show that while average house prices began to flatline at the end of 2022
View Full Article: House prices in Scotland start to flatline
Staggering inaccuracies in EPCs undermine net zero efforts
The Government puts its faith in EPC ratings to measure property energy usage in order to drive up energy efficiency in properties towards its energy targets, but can owners have the same faith?
Are EPCs as they stand robust enough? Do they give valid and reliable ratings when the Government uses these as its “North Star” to satisfy its legal commitment to net zero by 2050. Also as its legal standard for all sales and lettings, and increasingly they are used by lenders as a gateway to approve mortgages?
“Taxpayers, homeowners and landlords face paying billions of pounds to upgrade the energy efficiency of their homes – but the ‘staggering inaccuracy’ of energy certificates means the upgrades will make little difference to either climate change or energy bills.”
So says Martina Lees writing for The Sunday Times last week, based on the results of an in-depth study carried out by Climate Fintech company, Carbon Lance.
And they’re not on their own. Research carried out by property industry research and measurement group, SPEC, in their report “Impacts of inaccurate area measurement on EPC rating” concludes that of 2,500,000 EPCs lodged (15%) are incorrectly rated, having a score within 2 points of an upgrade or downgrade if measured accurately.
An estimated 35,028 E-rated properties are being let illegally, having borderline EPC scores that would likely be downgraded to F if their area was accurately measured, says SPEC.
Carbon Lance reckon, after comparing EPCs across 17,000 homes, that the average electricity and gas energy usage recorded was actually 91 percent lower that the figure predicted by the obtained EPC rating.
“The inaccuracy is ‘quire staggering’ says Madhuban Kumar founder of CarbonLaces. And apparently this inaccuracy, according to their figures, increases exponentially as the rating comes down the scale, grade G being the lowest rating with the highest inaccuracy.
Cursory inspections
What is often misunderstood about these these ratings is, they are set by assessors who do few if any actual energy efficiency measurements. It is very much an observation without doing any invasive checks, obtaining data often based on visual assumptions. No thorough testing whether there is or is not cavity wall or underfloor insulation for example, resulting in data fed into a computer program whose algorithm arbitrarily works out a score.
In the case of a domestic energy assessment, the assessor visits the property and carries out a non-invasive visual inspection looking into the characteristics of the property and how they might affect energy efficiency. Key features are noted such as the type of heating system, locations of radiators, sources of heat, areas of heat loss, insulation types, construction methods, types of glazing and doors etc.
The assessor measures the floor areas of rooms in the property, a key input to the EPC rating calculation. Their observations and size measurements are then typically entered into a software program, often on an application running on a tablet or mobile, which will then automatically calculate the EPC score and band rating for the property.
There are countless stories around of owners making so called improvements only to find their EPC rating has gone down when re-assessed. Fitting an electric boiler for example, going to LPG instead of natural gas or oil, can all negatively affect the EPC score.
The Sunday Times article also cites the issue of new build quality, where EPCs have been assessed purely on building plans, or by using just one sample property assessment on a new build estate to rate the whole estate.
The “gold standard”
Introduced in 2007 the EPC was to be the “gold standard”, helping people choose a property when renting or buying to gauge the cost of running a home. And the measure is beginning to gain traction among the buying and renting public who are beginning to rely on this information as their guide to energy efficiency.
It is also an increasingly important factor relied upon by mortgage lenders, most of whom will restrict loans to those with acceptable EPC ratings and some banks even adjust their lending rates depending on the EPC scores.
The UK Government has committed to reaching net zero emissions by 2050 and as such needs a measure to help it achieve this in property. This is a laudable aim, but its system of measurement needs to give valid and reliable results.
As part of the Government’s drive to net zero it is looking to reduce emissions across a wide range of sectors, including property. From April 2023 new rules on energy efficiency come into force in England and Wales.
Commercial property lettings
From this April it will be a legal requirement for all commercial rented properties to have an EPC (Energy Performance Certificate) rating of at least E. This is currently a legal requirement for commercial and residential properties for new tenancies or on renewal, but this requirement will be extended to both new and existing commercial leases too. All residential rented properties must already have a minimum rating of “E”.
Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) are meant to determine how energy-efficient a property is from A (most efficient) to G (least efficient). They should also show the potential level of emissions plus recommendations and associated costs of improving the rating for that property.
Owners must now obtain an EPC whenever a property is built, sold or rented. Landlords contemplating an increase in the minimum EPC rating to “C” (possibly by 2025) potentially face large bills to ensure their properties are compliant.
Minimum energy efficiency standards
So, minimum energy efficiency standards (MEES) requirements will extend to all existing commercial leases from 1 April 2023 and the rating will rise in future, with the government currently consulting on its aims to bring the majority of properties up to EPC band C by the end of the decade.
Information collected by Handelsbanken, a local relationship bank operating in Sweden and in the UK, obtained by research into the UK market to find out how prepared landlords are to meet the new regulations, found that:
- In order to meet the new EPC legislation changes 95% of commercial landlords will need to make improvements to their properties, with installing insulation (30%), double glazing (27%) and a new, energy-efficient boiler (26%) the most likely upgrades
- The anticipated cost of this investment is set to be £95,400 per corporate commercial landlord – or 3% of the total portfolio value
- Nearly a quarter of commercial landlords (23%) were not aware that this legislation was coming into effect
- One in nine (11%) plans to sell any properties with a rating of less than E as they cannot afford to make them more sustainable, while only 5% have properties with an E or below rating
- The main issues preventing landlords from making their portfolios more environmentally sustainable are not having enough knowledge (50%), regulations making it too difficult (48%) and not being able to access finance (18%)
- However, 67% of landlords believe that their portfolio is already sustainable enough.
Residential property lettings
As for EPCs for residential rental properties, the government began a consultation in 2020 about updating the MEES rules and came up with some new proposals such as reaching EPC “C” by 2025 for new lettings and 2028 for existing lettings. These proposals are not yet in law.
The cost cap to help landlords finance the improvements needed to reach the required standard would under the proposals be raised from £3,500 to £10,000 per property. The government has estimated that this would be sufficient to bring more than 90% of D-rated properties up to a C rating, as well as nearly 60% of E-rated properties. It’s not clear yet whether existing spending would count towards the new cap.
In addition, guidance is being issued on the priority routes to improvements in residential properties known as a “fabric first” policy to control the order work is carried out. Improvements to the fabric of the building (ie insulation, windows and doors) would be prioritised before other additional measures, such as new heating systems, solar, heat pumps etc are installed.
More accurate EPCs
The Government has instigated a review and EPC action plan designed to deliver an EPC system that produces accurate, reliable, and trusted EPCs. Actions delivered to date, says the Government “ include the new Energy Performance of Buildings Register (‘the Register’) designed according to government standards and extensively tested with Register users; the implementation of EPC lodgement rules that help prevent lodgement errors; and the publication of a consultation on options for the introduction of a new performance-based operational ratings scheme for non-domestic buildings.”
OPINION: The EPC ratings system is “not fit for purpose”
View Full Article: Staggering inaccuracies in EPCs undermine net zero efforts
Build to rent is UK’s fastest growing housing sector
Build to rent (BTR) is growing more rapidly than any other housing sector, according to a new report.
The British Property Federation (BPF)’s Build to Rent Q3 2022 report revealed growth of 15% year-on-year, with more than 240,000 homes either in planning
View Full Article: Build to rent is UK’s fastest growing housing sector
This company will sell your tenanted properties fast – in just 28 days so you can exit your portfolio

We’ve all seen the news, with changes in regulations and tax and interest rate rises, landlords have been flocking to sell their property portfolios.
But with so many properties, all full with tenants, some of them with problems, low rents or even rent skipping, how can you get out fast?
The answer is: Landlord Sales Agency. We know the mammoth effort it takes to get rental properties ready for sale, to market them, to liaise with tenants or worse, evict tenants.
That’s why from the moment you contact us, our team takes everything off your hands. We know exactly what it takes to sell tenanted properties, fast, and the results from landlords who have contacted us speak for themselves – most of our property portfolios sell in less than 28 days.
It might seem too good to be true in this current market where landlords are struggling to get out, but for us at Landlord Sales Agency, it really is that simple.
Our team of incredible portfolio exit specialists deal with every single issue, liaise with your tenants, collect all the materials for sale, arrange viewings and even assist with out of date certificates or repairs on the properties.
Tenants are no issue – in most cases, our huge private database of new landlord buyers queuing up to buy and our extensive network of the top property buying companies means that we’re able to sell your properties tenanted with zero hassle. In some cases, our buyers are so confident with our process, they don’t even need a viewing to buy.
This, combined with our modern auction techniques which create a bidding war on your properties to drive up prices, mean that we really will get you the best possible price in the fastest possible time, allowing you to relax from the moment you call us and knowing that you’ll have exited your property portfolio with the money in the bank in weeks rather than months.
- Landlord Sales Agency have a powerful database of over 30,000 private buyers and portfolio buying companies who want to buy whole portfolios straight away,and who are alerted every time we have a portfolio to sell
- We focus on a quality fast sale, rather than a cheap fast sale and ensure that our buy-to-let portfolios are sold fast, often in less than 28 days. We also ensure that we never compromise on the sale price no matter how much work your portfolio needs.
- We typically achieve 80 – 90% of the market value, and for that we cover all the costs and take away all the hassle that comes with selling the portfolio. We’re completely transparent, so you know exactly what we’re making. You won’t get a higher price for the service, and any company promising you 100% market value is hiding a huge list of costs that are going to come after the sale. That’s not the case with us. It’s what makes us different.
- We’re a company created by landlords for landlords, so we now exactly what you need to do to overcome all the hurdles and release you from financial stress, including rising taxes, interest rates and bills. In some cases we’re even able to help out with cash advances.
- There’s no one like us out there, and we’ve built up an unbeatable record for helping landlords which is why we’re the number one go-to company for our partners, including LandlordZONE
We’re so confident in our ability to sell tenanted properties in a matter of days and, at the very most, weeks, that in the cases where the buyers do want your properties empty, we even work with tenants to help them find new accommodation plus in some cases pay for their deposits and first month of rent to ensure they’re able to leave fast, and they’re happy knowing they’re safely in a brand new home.
No one else goes as far as we do to get you exactly what you need. That’s what makes Landlord Sales Agency the unbeatable solution out there for landlords looking to sell.
So if you’re looking sell your buy-to-lets, let us take the stress off your hands and get you the best price, no matter what condition your portfolio is in.
Contact Landlord Sales Agency:
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-submit-container .wpforms-submit, body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-field-pagebreak button.wpforms-page-button {
font-weight: bold;background-color:#04abed ; border-width: 0px; }
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-submit-container .wpforms-submit:hover, body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-field-pagebreak button.wpforms-page-button:hover {
background-color:#ed1c2a; }
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-submit-container,body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-field-pagebreak .wpforms-pagebreak-left{
}
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-form .wpforms-field input[type=text],
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-form .wpforms-field input[type=email],
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-form .wpforms-field input[type=tel],
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-form .wpforms-field input[type=url],
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-form .wpforms-field input[type=password],
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-form .wpforms-field input[type=number]
{
background-color:#d3d3d3 ; border-width: 1px; }
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-form .wpforms-field .wpforms-field-row
{
}
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-form .wpforms-field textarea {
background-color:#d3d3d3 ; border-width: 1px;
}
body #wpforms-258808 .wpforms-form .wpforms-field label.wpforms-field-label {
font-weight: bold;color:#000000 ; }
/* Styling for Tablets */
@media only screen and (max-width: 800px) and (min-width:481px) {
}
@media only screen and (max-width: 480px){
}
/*Option to add custom CSS */
View Full Article: This company will sell your tenanted properties fast – in just 28 days so you can exit your portfolio
‘Link landlord EPC costs to rents instead of £10k cap’ politicians told
Landlords’ financial contribution to upgrading properties in Wales should be linked to average market rents in any given area, suggests the NRLA.
Under its proposals, landlords would need to contribute a minimum of £5,000, while those renting properties in areas with higher average rents would need to contribute more, gradually tapering to £10,000.
The NRLA believes the proposed £10,000 cost-cap on energy efficiency upgrades is uneconomical in a region where some properties might not meet the required standard.
Ineffective
It says the MEES (Miniumum Energy Efficiency Standard) is ineffective, especially in Wales, given the prevalence of older properties which cost more to upgrade to a higher EPC band.
The cap could represent a significant proportion of the value of the average property and would drive landlords out of the market.

NRLA chief executive Ben Beadle says the government fails to accept the realities of different property and rental values across the country, and that the private rented sector contains some of the most difficult to retrofit homes.
He adds: “Ministers need a smarter approach with a proper financial package if we want to ensure improvements to the rental housing stock.”
A new report from Members of the Senedd has taken the NRLA’s comments on board and suggests that the Welsh government should instead consider tax incentives in the PRS, arguing that ministers could look at how to use council tax and the land transaction tax to incentivise energy efficiency retrofit as a priority.
The report also warns: “While the UK government continues to drag its feet over whether to increase standards in the private rented sector, the sector remains in limbo.”
In its evidence, the Chartered Institute of Housing says there is significant evidence that MEES is currently poorly enforced. It calls for the development of “an effective national MEES compliance and enforcement database and tools”, which could be delivered across Wales.
Read all our stories about MEES.
View Full Article: ‘Link landlord EPC costs to rents instead of £10k cap’ politicians told
WARNING: Rent reforms ‘could reverse RRO court judgement’ for landlords
Superior landlords could find themselves hit by Rent Repayment Orders if the government decides to amend the upcoming Renters Reform Bill.
Property lawyer at JMW, David Smith (main picture), says that despite the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of Rakusen v Jepsen- that an RRO cannot be made against a superior landlord but only against the immediate landlord of the tenancy that generates the relevant rent – there was still uncertainty.
“I could see interested MPs laying down amendments to the Bill to mute this judgement,” he tells LandlordZONE. “Whether they would be accepted is another matter.”
Sanctions
The Justices said there was a range of other sanctions available to combat rogue landlords, including fines, civil penalties and banning orders, but that it was ultimately up to Parliament to decide whether these were sufficient.
Smith adds that it was gratifying the Supreme Court acknowledged his intervention on behalf of the NRLA and accepted their argument, name-checking the landlord body in its judgement.
The NRLA had pointed out the full range of penalties currently available to prosecute errant landlords and explained: “It might be thought that [the] prospect of a property owner entering into such an arrangement solely to evade a potential RRO, while simultaneously leaving themselves open to prosecution for criminal offences, is a little far-fetched.”
Directors
Smith says he would prefer to see a change in the law, making directors of companies liable for Rent Repayment Orders, to address the issue of rent-to-rent operators setting up front companies that go bust rather than pay the penalties.
“That could then be easily rectified as you could prosecute directors of companies for failure to licence,” he adds. “It wouldn’t be a huge change to direct an order against a director instead.”
The justices in the Supreme Court case were told this too by one of the lawyers, who pointed out that rent-to-rent companies often ‘disappear’ once deals go south, only to phoenix with the same directors a few months later.
View Full Article: WARNING: Rent reforms ‘could reverse RRO court judgement’ for landlords
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (12,398)
Archives
- January 2026 (2)
- December 2025 (62)
- August 2025 (51)
- July 2025 (51)
- June 2025 (49)
- May 2025 (50)
- April 2025 (48)
- March 2025 (54)
- February 2025 (51)
- January 2025 (52)
- December 2024 (55)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Get ahead of the curve: we’ll sell your properties before the January rush drives prices down
- 2026: The year landlords finally lose their nerve
- New tenants’ housing union set to challenge landlords and government
- How One Landlord Restructured £5m of Debt with Commercial Finance
- No final decision on EPC requirements for short-term holiday lets

admin