Criminals laundering money for fraudulent rental payments
Fraud:
Criminals have been sentenced for money laundering after fraudulent rental payments.
Three London criminals have been sentenced after pleading guilty to money laundering in April 2019. Two criminals were sentenced on 27 June 2019 and the third was sentenced on 21 September – all the sentences were handed down at Snaresbrook Crown Court.
The sentences follow an investigation spearheaded by the National Trading Standards eCrime Team, which found that an online property letting business – Oliver Knights – was being used as a vehicle for fraud that has led to at least £50,000 financial loss for tenants and landlords.
All three defendants pleaded guilty to money laundering, having knowingly allowed their bank accounts to be used to launder the proceeds of lettings frauds between the 31 December 2013 and 4 September 2015.* These proceeds specifically relate to rental payments received for properties that were never available to rent.
The final sentences handed down were as follows:
- Adnan Iqbal 34 from Barking, sentenced to 10 months, suspended for 18 months on 21 September 2019
- Shaidul Islam 29 from Ilford, sentenced to 1 year, suspended for 18 months
- Kamran Malik 31 from Plaistow, sentenced to 1 year, suspended for 18 months.
Mr Islam and Mr Malik were also ordered to pay compensation orders totaling more than £15,000, which is being redistributed to victims. All three were also ordered to do 120 hours unpaid community work each.
The investigation was prompted by more than 40 complaints to Action Fraud and Citizens Advice about Oliver Knights and has exposed how the business was used a vehicle for fraud, causing financial loss, distress and significant inconvenience (such as leaving people without a home) for prospective tenants and landlords. It is not suggested that the defendants were involved in the underlying frauds.
Lord Toby Harris, Chair, National Trading Standards, said:
“The defendants knowingly allowed fraudulent payments to be made into bank accounts and – while not being the architects of the fraud – have benefited financially from fraudulent activity. We are determined to clamp down on those who benefit from the financial exploitation of others and I am grateful to our investigators for their determination to secure justice and compensation for the victims, who have been left out of pocket and, in some cases, emotionally scarred.”
“The internet is a natural place to search for rental properties, but online search portals can be manipulated by criminals and it’s important to be vigilant. You should always check properties through accredited schemes – such as the Residential Landlords Accreditation Scheme or the National Approved Letting Scheme – and avoid paying deposits before you have visited the property yourself. Importantly, never feel pressured to transfer money to strangers.”
To report any suspected cases of fraud you should contact the Citizens Advice consumer helpline on 03454 04 05 06.
Background on Oliver Knights – a vehicle for fraud
Whilst it is not suggested that the defendants were involved in the underlying frauds, the background to Oliver Knights is important to understand the impact of the money laundering on victims.
Oliver Knights advertised properties to let on websites such as Rightmove, Zoopla, Gumtree and their own site to attract interest from prospective tenants. After initial dialogue and property viewings, consumers paid deposits and rent in advance – totalling hundreds or thousands of pounds – only to be told that the property was no longer available, or to not hear anything further from Oliver Knights representatives.
Some of the properties offered for rent had never been available and had been falsely advertised without the consent of the owners. In other instances, consumers paid deposits and rent and moved into the property before discovering that the transaction had been completed without the landlord’s knowledge and/or without the necessary payments being passed on to the landlord by Oliver Knights. This left some renters without a home and caused financial loss to landlords.
Victims – both consumers and landlords – have mentioned the impact of the experience on them. This includes:
- Causing stress and anxiety
- Loss of money, including being forced to borrow money from high-interest lenders to pay for deposits
- Leaving people without a home – some victims had to sofa-surf for weeks or relocate to a different city and change jobs
- Health issues, including headaches, exhaustion, weight loss and panic attacks.
* The charges were money laundering contrary to section 327 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
For more information visit www.nationaltradingstandards.uk
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Criminals laundering money for fraudulent rental payments | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Criminals laundering money for fraudulent rental payments
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,917)
Archives
- December 2024 (44)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords could pay tenants up to two years’ rent for failing Decent Homes Standard as PBSA is exempt
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025