Long-dated reversions
A reversion is when the full (market) value of the property reverts to the interest of the superior landlord. An example of a long-dated reversion is a freehold ground rent. A ground rent is usually associated with a long-lease, the rent of the ‘ground’ – the land upon which the property is built, as distinct from the built-structure itself. Whether how the amount of ground rent has been arrived at is necessarily of the land alone, the amount would be low compared to the rental value of the property as a whole. On reversion, expiry of the lease, the rental would revert to the full value of the property (including the built-structure), depending upon legislation and case-law.
In the commercial property market, ground rents, including long-dated reversions, used to be sought after by higher-rate taxpayers desirous not of income, but capital growth. The tax advantage has been largely eroded but the investment case remains, particularly for pension funds where subject to availability it is possible to time the reversion date with the pension withdrawal. In buying a low rent, the purchase price is akin to a percentage of the full capital value of the property, virtually guaranteeing that the closer the reversion the more the property will go up in value. Theoretical valuation is to calculate the net present rental income for the duration and add the estimated rental on reversion deferred by the duration. The rate of interest for each calculation is a variable. Together with the theoretical, the practical approach would include but not limited to what else can be bought for the same money to produce the same sort of yield but with more scope for investment angles and capital appreciation.
With low interest rates, long-dated reversions are attractive investment propositions. Given the choice for the same price between (1) a rack-rented or foreseeable rent review property whose capital appreciation depends upon an increase in that rent, and (2) a low rented property whose capital appreciation depends upon the number of years remaining until reversion, the latter would be less risky, particularly since any prospect of the tenant going broke would be welcomed.
The rent of long-dated reversions can be fixed throughout the term, or with preset fixed increases at specified intervals, or subject to rent review, either formulaic or geared to market rent. With a geared rent review, at each review the rent payable after the market rent is agreed or ascertained would be some percentage of the market rent (as defined by the lease). Long-term leases are rapidly becoming an instrument of the past and even where they continue to be granted the wording of the lease is more sophisticated than before. It is very easy to overpay, a consequence of investment market (auction) sentiment, and, as one might expect, long-dated reversions are not all plain-sailing. The obvious downside is that anything can happen over a long time. Whether that matters depends upon the yield, the relationship between the purchase price and the reversion date.
Long leases at fixed or rising ground rents offer possibilities for the patient. There might be investment angles and scope for different interpretations that can result in substantial windfalls. A superb example is Brockhall Village, Lancashire: cited as the archetypal dream for every ground rent investor, this was a ground rent in a 999 year lease of a former mental hospital where the tenant, the NHS, having closed the hospital would have been able to sell the site for redevelopment had it not been for a restricted user clause and the freeholder, (Gerald Hitman was a school-friend of mine), refusing change of use. Instead, the freeholder took the lease back and developed Brockhall Village, a gated community including some 400 homes, hotel and training ground for Blackburn Rovers football team.
Commercial property geared rent review introduces inexperience to the subtly of rent review. To the inexperienced, a geared review might be thought a dead cert. but it is not. Inexperience might reason that long-dated review intervals should result in an overage (addition) in comparison with the norm, for example 21 yearly reviews compared to 5 yearly, the 16 years advantage of value to the tenant. Where inexperience goes wrong is in ignoring the possibility that in the market at the valuation date a long-term might not be in demand. Regardless of the long-dated review frequency, the term of the lease might not only cancel any overage but also reduce the rent.
Another factor enters the experienced way of thinking. The comparison between the review in question and the market at the valuation date including any evidence. With reviews to market rent, amongst the assumptions for the hypothetical lease is the notional term. Whether the notional term should be the unexpired residue or the original term at the review date, the specific nature of the premises and the locality are factors to take into account. Whether for the hypothetical tenant it would more advantageous or disadvantageous for a term to be more or less than the ‘norm’ is not something to be decided upon in isolation.
The case law concerns the date from which the notional term is calculated. To defeat any interpretation that the residue is more advantageous than the original term, or vice versa, some leases require the valuation to be based on either possibility. With geared rent review, where the duration of contractual term might be an issue, another possibility, provided the wording of lease allows, is the ‘market-led’ approach. A ‘market led’ approach goes beyond the original term or residue into the best of all, namely that a rent on a lease of any duration can be considered.
With long-dated reversions, anything can happen which is why it is so important for investors to appreciate that the direction that the market for the type of property and its locality is taking must remain in sync with the direction of the demand. To overcome resistance to rent increases, the theoretical aspects of rent review can be used to defeat the all-too-often casually-relied upon presumption in favour of reality, but the impact of success might not necessarily assist long-term capital appreciation.
Michael Lever
The Rent Review Specialist
Established 1975
… LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Long-dated reversions
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,917)
Archives
- December 2024 (44)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords could pay tenants up to two years’ rent for failing Decent Homes Standard as PBSA is exempt
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025