GETTING REDRESS: ‘Who agreed to an illegal HMO – agent or landlord?’
Suzy Hershman (main picture), Resolution Department Lead at HFIS, examines a shocking case her team dealt with recently and highlights what landlords can learn from it.
The case
A landlord with a four-bedroom property in East London alleged that his agent had rented the house to approximately 12 tenants, exposing him to a potential fine or prosecution as his HMO licence only allowed four people to live within it.
Although he signed a guaranteed rent contract with the agent which was straightforward (albeit skewed in the agent’s favour), what’s disputed are the negotiations that took place before the tenancy started.
The landlord claims he did not agree to it being operated outside its licence conditions, while the agent says it was already over-crowded when they took on the property.
The agent has since refused to relinquish the house despite the landlord giving notice under the terms of the contract.
The local agent that the landlord used was a member of the Property Redress Scheme and therefore the landlord’s complaint came to us.
What happened?
This case began last year when, after finding that the property was overcrowded and that local people had been complaining about the tenants, the landlord asked that it be returned to him once the contract with his agent expired in April this year.
The second issue was that the agent had paid the landlord £300 a month less than agreed. Our case officer suspected that the landlord didn’t want to take all the money because he knew the property was being rented out illegally, but it was only a hunch.
Nevertheless, the agency took almost twice as much in rent as they are paying the landlord.
We felt that although the landlord and agent did have a written agreement, the agent behaved unreasonably and continues to do so by not relinquishing the property.
Therefore, an award has been given to the landlord for the poor conduct of the agent.
Agents should always keep good records of their dealings with landlords particularly when they are changing, agreeing or discussing important features of a tenancy.
We felt this agent considered the landlord somewhat naive and that they could get away with taking advantage of him.
An example of this is that when the landlord gave notice under the terms of the rent guarantee contract, the agent claimed they couldn’t return the property to him until the tenants moved out – which is likely to be a long time – and that’s exactly what’s happened.
What are the key lessons here?
- Landlords and agents should record all their discussions and negotiations prior to signing contracts in writing – otherwise working out who’s telling the truth in a dispute can be difficult later on.
- Vet your agent very carefully – for example what’s their office like? How do their staff talk to people on the phone? Are they accredited and do they have valid redress membership displayed in their windows?
- Don’t assume rental contracts are balanced – some agents write them to be in their favour and not so much in your interests.
- If you’ve signed an agreement with an agency, it is possible to negotiate if you feel they are unreasonable – but very few landlords do.
View Full Article: GETTING REDRESS: ‘Who agreed to an illegal HMO – agent or landlord?’
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’