EXCLUSIVE: Shocking story behind council’s failed Selective Licensing bid
A leading member of the private rental market community in Luton has contacted LandlordZONE to highlight the actions of Luton Council over the past 18 months as it has attempted, so far unsuccessfully, to introduce a Selective Licensing scheme.
Luton Council has been thwarted in its attempts to introduce a scheme partly through the campaigning work of local landlords and letting agents, and partly because of errors made by the council.
Quick history
The council tried to introduce a scheme in April 2018, faced significant local opposition and then went silent about its plans until December 2019 when a council committee approved its plans, which were then rubber stamped by its executive committee several weeks later.
After two virtual meetings with concerned locals during July, the scheme was still going ahead. A group of agents, landlords and concerned residents then got together and formed Luton Landlords and Letting Agents Ltd, whose solicitor then launched a legal challenge.
The council then admitted errors in its implementation and decision making, and the scheme now appears to be on hold as the council says want to “continue to work with landlords to help drive up standards in the town and will be undertaking a further review to gauge the current need for/scope of any new Licensing scheme.”.
What went wrong
The person involved wishes to remain anonymous but says the story in the public domain is only part of the picture. They claim that:
- The communication and consultation efforts during the process have been poor and designed to keep locals out of the process.
- Luton Council over-egged problems within the private rental market to justify its Selective Licensing decision.
- The council revealed a conflict of interest – it said if landlords didn’t want to sign up to the scheme, they could rent their homes through the council’s own ‘social tenants’ lettings agency.
- Councillors Dave Stevenson (Private Sector Housing and Enforcement) and Councillor Tom Shaw ignored calls to justify the scheme or explain how it would improve standards in the town.
- Landlords and agents were given a matter of weeks to apply for the scheme which, given the 10,000 properties involved, was optimistic given it was during the height of the Covid lockdown.
- Luton Council failed to follow the proper statutory procedures for bringing in a Selective Licensing scheme and, it now transpires, did not have the authority to make a designation and bring in the scheme at all, which should have been submitted to the Secretary of State for approval, making the original attempts to introduce the scheme unlawful.
- Luton has wasted significant sums of taxpayer cash at a time when it claims to be under financial stress.
“We should be able to trust that people employed by the Council are competent to do the job, to not mismanage their resources, get value for money from staff and contractors, provide much needed services to local… not wasting taxpayer monies and trying to introduce stealth taxes,” our source says.
LandlordZONE has approached Luton Council for comment but so far not received a response.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – EXCLUSIVE: Shocking story behind council’s failed Selective Licensing bid | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: EXCLUSIVE: Shocking story behind council’s failed Selective Licensing bid
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’