Major council launches mould and damp crackdown in PRS including fines
Hackney Council has launched a major enforcement drive against private landlords who ignore complaints about serious damp and mould, signalling an unofficial application of ‘Awaab’s Law‘ for landlords.
It has agreed a 25% increase in funding (£400,000) a year for the authority’s private sector enforcement team, focusing on expanding its capacity and ensuring private landlords meet their duty to tackle damp and mould and provide a good, safe home to tenants.
Rogue landlords will face hefty fines and legal action if they don’t comply.
Since 1st December, the council has responded to more than 70 reports of damp and mould in privately rented homes, which each report acted on within five days and enforcement notices were served where the landlords failed to take steps to resolve the issue.
Awaab Ishak
This announcement is the latest step in Hackney’s response to the case of Awaab Ishak, a two-year-old who died following prolonged exposure to mould in his family home in Rochdale.
It follows new council plans to tackle damp and mould in its own housing stock, including a five-day turnaround to address all reported damp and mould issues and a new next working day repair service to respond to reports of leaks.
The investment is also the latest boost for the council’s #BetterRenting campaign which is working for a better system for the more than 30,000 private renters in Hackney by supporting tenants, challenging government and tackling rogue landlords.
The borough already hands out the third largest fines to landlords in the capital, according to geospatial technology company Kamma, with an average of £11,250.
Read more: the ultimate guide to inspecting your property.
View Full Article: Major council launches mould and damp crackdown in PRS including fines
Property firm boss banned for 12 years after falsely claiming £45,000 Covid loan
A property investor who falsely claimed a £45,000 Bounce Back Loan before dissolving his firm has been banned by the Insolvency Service.
Simon Gorgin, 63, from Kings Langley, was sole director of P3 Estates Ltd until it was dissolved in December 2021.
In May 2020, he stated on the loan application that the firm’s turnover in 2019 had been £180,000.
However, investigators discovered that P3 Estate Ltd had never traded, and had not been trading at the time of the loan application and so wasn’t entitled to receive any money.
They also found that three days after the loan arrived in the company’s account, Gorgin further breached the rules of the scheme by transferring the full £45,000 to his own bank account.
Strike off
Gorgin, who has other business interests in the creative sector, also failed to notify the bank from which he had borrowed the money that he had applied to strike off the company in April 2021.
By July of the same year P3 Estates still owed the full amount of the loan, prompting an investigation by the Insolvency Service.
He has now been banned for 12 years, which prevents him from directly or indirectly becoming involved in the promotion, formation or management of a company, without the permission of the court. A compensation order is being recommended to recover the money.
Abused
Peter Smith, deputy head of dissolved company investigations, says Gorgin abused the scheme and took taxpayers’ money at a time when many businesses were in genuine need.
“His lengthy ban should stand as a warning that we will take action against directors who abuse government support schemes,” he adds.
View Full Article: Property firm boss banned for 12 years after falsely claiming £45,000 Covid loan
Buy-for-Uni: How to be a student student landlord
It’s that time of year when students will be looking to sort out accommodation for the upcoming year, so what better time to learn more about our Buy-for-Uni proposition?
A Buy-for-Uni mortgage allows students to purchase a property local to their university
View Full Article: Buy-for-Uni: How to be a student student landlord
Retro-fitting buildings for energy efficiency – is it worth it?
Refurbishing, or in the jargon – retrofitting – older commercial and residential buildings, according to the Government, is desirable and necessary, given that energy efficiency standards that will need to be met under the Government’s legal commitment to net zero by 2050.
But is this kind of refurbishment economically viable in today’s straightened times; UK businesses are operating in a low grow, high tax economy that’s likely to be years in recovery? Residential landlords are under pressure with rising mortgage rates and other costs, a punishing tax regime and ever increasing regulation.
Many small-scale buy-to-let investors are weighing the economics of doing this right now. Many single lets are of the older property stock types, terrace properties with solid walls which present expensive up-grade costs, not to mention the hassle involved if it’s under a long-term tenancy.
The environmental cost
With energy consumption and costs increasing across the globe, older commercial and residential buildings are said to be responsible for consuming a large portion of the nation’s energy – they account for up to 20 per cent of carbon emissions in the UK and represent a higher than necessary amount of energy consumption.
Cutting pollution and saving energy is the need of the hour, but just how cost effective is investing in an environmentally sound refurbishment (retrofitting) project to the average commercial or residential large building owner?
Commercial buildings
Commercial building owners often struggle to see the evidence that these outlays will generate their desired returns, but that perception is beginning to change says property international property agents JLL.
Traditionally, owners see improvements in the efficiency of a building on a years-return basis – if the return period is short enough they will do it. The problem is that a simple cash return break-even analysis, looking only at operating costs, acts as a barrier to investment judged simply over the short-term.
Retrofitting investments must be viewed in a different context says JLL: they may not be self-funding on a purely operational cash flow basis, but other long-term benefits will ensue – the old rules for evaluating these projects must change, that’s the argument being put forward by several recent studies as well.
The return on sustainability investments is often undervalued, says JLL. Building owners need to look beyond operating costs to assess the impact on a building’s overall value, taking a longer term view.
JLL gives the example of a building worth £120 million in today’s market and needs a £18 million (15 per cent) upgrade.
That sort of investment may never be fully recovered on an operating-cost break-even basis, but tenant demand for low-carbon buildings is accelerating apace: there’s a big risk that a building’s value will fall dramatically if it fails to meet future tenants’ needs and the Government’s low-carbon targets.
Building will become unlettable
It means that older buildings throughout the globe that cannot meet low-carbon targets could become unsaleable and unlettable. Whereas low-carbon rental space in the right locations will likely earn substantial premiums when they benefit from efficient and tasteful retrofit conversions.
This risk-versus-value spread is beginning to show in multiple markets around the globe, London being a prime example. JLL predicts there being as significant shortage of commercial spaces with the right low-carbon footprints by 2025. This, they say, is down to the number of companies with net zero commitments, compared with the retrofit pipeline.
The supply simply won’t meet the demand in the future. “Retrofitting will contribute to delivering on that growing demand and driving value from changes to valuation fundamentals including rents, voids and operating costs,” says JLL.
“We consistently see these results in practice. A tenfold increase in mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineering (MEP) related capital costs to decarbonize prime office space in London are often more than offset by improvements in rent, reduced void periods and lower exit yield discounts. The result is that implementing a zero-carbon strategy is accretive – especially where some significant works are already planned.
“As companies continue to take action on decarbonizing their businesses, building owners who wait for greater certainty or regulation will fall behind the demand curve and face valuation risks. The reality is sustainability-minded companies will vacate buildings if owners don’t invest in retrofitting them. And we’ll see more pressure from that every year.”
80% of office buildings which exist today will still be in-use in 2050, says JLL
What about vintage buildings?
According to a recent report commissioned by the National Trust, Historic England, the Crown Estate and property companies Peabody and Grosvenor, retrofitting the UK’s historic buildings would support 290,000 jobs and boost the UK economy by £35 billion, while at the same time meeting the Government’s energy efficiency targets by slashing Britain’s carbon emissions.
Improving the energy efficiency of these historic buildings – those built before 1919 – both commercial and residential, would reduce the carbon emissions from all of the UK’s buildings by 5% per year; it would make these older buildings, homes and workplaces warmer to work in and live in and much cheaper to run.
Heritage and property groups have outlined a plan to boost energy efficiency at historical sites to create jobs, cut emissions and meet net-zero targets. Retrofitting the UK’s historical buildings – from Georgian town houses to the mills and factories that kickstarted the Industrial Revolution – could, says the report, generate £35bn of economic output per year. It would also result in additional skills training, create thousands of extra jobs and skills, and it would help achieve the Government’s climate change targets.
Just under 25 per cent of all UK houses, around 6 million of them, are pre 1919, and around 30 per cent of the commercial property stock in the UK is also in this vintage category. That’s around 600,000 commercial buildings. Property is responsible for around 20 per cent of the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions, and these older buildings are a significant proportion of that.
A bigger challenge
Retrofitting vintage buildings represents a bigger challenge than the same process in more modern buildings, but ensuring their insulation, windows and heating systems are more energy efficient will lower emissions and prolong the building’s lifespan.
Doing this avoids the wasted carbon emissions when a building is demolished and re-built from scratch. It avoids the large amount of emissions emitted during the site clearance and making the building materials such as cement and steel production necessary for construction.
The housing association Peabody, the crown estate and Grosvenor, the Duke of Westminster’s property firm, are arguing that a national retrofitting campaign for older buildings would result in the extra £35bn of economic output annually benefiting many industries along the way.
An example cited is Peabody Avenue in Pimlico in London where two terraces of staircase-access flats built in 1876 was used as a pilot project, an experiment to understand how to sensitively retrofit a set of heritage buildings.
Another example is the Grade II-listed Canada House in Manchester retrofit now in progress. Built in 1909 and owned by Grosvenor, the programme is to improve the building’s environmental performance.
Historic England has a record of restoring listed buildings, for example the 18th-century Shrewsbury Flaxmill Maltings.
Traditional skills needed in these refurbishments, such as lime plastering, are taught at workshops at the Heritage Skills Centre in Oxfordshire.
The report estimates there will be 105,000 new workers needed in this work, including plumbers, electricians, carpenters and scaffolders over a period of three decades if net zero targets are to be met – 14,500 more electricians and 14,300 plumbers will be required.
The organisations involved in this project want the government to make the apprenticeship levy more flexible, allowing unspent funds to be channelled into training people in heritage retrofit.
View Full Article: Retro-fitting buildings for energy efficiency – is it worth it?
Telltale signs on how spot a bad tenant!
A bad tenant could cost you thousands but how do you spot the bad ones?
There are so many stories I read every day of a tenant who trashed a landlord’s property, leaving the landlord to pick up the tab.
View Full Article: Telltale signs on how spot a bad tenant!
HMO landlords urged to share views on controversial council tax re-banding consultation
Leaders of a campaign seeking to change the law on unfair HMO property council tax re-banding are urging landlords to input into the ongoing Government consultation on the matter due to end on the 31st March.
As LandlordZONE has reported, many HMOs that originally were classified as single residential units for council tax purposes are now being re-banded as multiple units, which is being classed as an extra tax on tenants who live in HMOs.
Many tenants are now facing paying much higher and sometimes backdated demands for council tax where in the past their landlord paid their share of the single annual council tax bill.
But a concerted and well-organised campaign by the HMO Council Tax Reform Group to lobby Ministers on the issue and how unfair it is to tenants has been successful in moving minds in Whitehall.
This has included raising £7,000 to fund the effort, a popular Facebook site and dozens of letters written to MPs, several of whom have now backed the campaign.
Bill amendment
The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities recently invited the group’s lawyer Alan Murdy to craft an amendment to the Levelling Up bill going through parliament to severely limit when and how HMOs can be reclassified.
This is now being consulted on and Wendy Whittaker-Large (main image), the co-founder of the group, says it is now imperative that as many HMO landlords as possible get involved to persuade Minister to carry through on their promise to reform how HMOs are classified for council tax purposes.
Give your views to the consultation.
The call has made by Whittaker-Large during an interview with co-campaigner Neil Chadda by Vanessa Warwick of Property Tribes, during which it was underlined how HMO landlords “have less than a month now to put their views forward for the consultation”.
Watch the whole video.
Pic credit: PropertyTribes/YouTube
View Full Article: HMO landlords urged to share views on controversial council tax re-banding consultation
My tenants want to apply for social housing?
Hello, I am a private landlord. I had my tenants before 2016. They have been on a rolling tenancy since the AST fixed term expired.
I also had a ‘Deed of Guarantee’ signed by their guarantor when they moved in.
View Full Article: My tenants want to apply for social housing?
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’