City launches consultation on ‘eye watering’ new fees for HMOs
Nottingham has revealed it will charge non-accredited, less compliant HMO landlords an eye-watering £1,993 fee to join its proposed additional licensing scheme – a £273 increase on the current scheme’s fee.
Accredited landlords will pay £1,118 – up from £990 – in a city already used to having to fork out big bucks for a licence; according to the HMO Hub website, Nottingham’s mandatory HMO scheme is one of the most expensive outside London, at £1,330 for a standard application.
The authority explains that this ‘less compliant’ fee covers any additional monitoring, inspections and enforcement that might be needed, basing the figure on covering staffing levels to deal with 5,300 applications.
Nottingham Council insists that its current additional scheme has had a positive impact on HMOs, including tackling problems with waste management and anti-social behaviour.
The current additional scheme, covering parts of central Nottingham, will soon come to an end and the council hopes to introduce a new citywide scheme, which would run for five years from January 2024.
However, landlords in the city will be voicing their concerns during the current month-long consultation.
Concerned
An NRLA spokesman tells LandlordZONE that it is concerned about plans to increase licensing fees across the board.
“Quite frankly the council’s licensing schemes have become a de facto tax on much needed rented housing rather than an effective tool to root out rogue and criminal landlords,” he adds.
“Given the council will be able to access details of landlords and properties on the planned national property portal and in light of plans for a decent homes standard for the sector, licencing schemes of this kind are completely redundant and should be scrapped.”
Lambeth holds the dubious honour of having the most expensive additional licensing scheme in the UK, where landlords pay £2,024 to license a four-bedroom HMO.
Read the consultation details in full.
View Full Article: City launches consultation on ‘eye watering’ new fees for HMOs
Landlord fined after tenants spend Xmas and NY without water or decent heating
An experienced landlord who left a family with a baby without water or adequate heating in their rented property over Christmas and New Year has been fined.
Anthony Wardrop, 79, of The Parade, Hartlepool, had denied a charge of failing to comply with an Improvement Notice served in January 2022 but was found guilty when he appeared at Peterlee Magistrates’ Court
Wardrop, acting on behalf of Sedgedene Estates, who’s also a director of a used car firm, was fined £1,000 and ordered to pay £580 in costs for failing to carry out work to make the property in Westmoreland Street safe.
Water supply
The court heard the landlord had failed to ensure a constant water supply was provided to the rented property. This had left the family, including a baby and two older children, without water or adequate heating over Christmas and New Year in 2021.
The Improvement Notice, issued by Darlington Council’s private sector housing officers, also ordered him to carry out basic duties in the property such as providing gas and electricity safety certificates, ensuring the property had adequate heating and was free from damp and mould.
Wardrop had delayed carrying out works inside the property for several months which only started after investigations for the prosecution began, despite continued efforts by the council to help him.
Councillor Mike Renton (pictured), cabinet member for stronger communities, says: “The owner of this property failed to carry out the basic responsibilities required of him as a landlord, leaving a young family without water or adequate heating which is simply not acceptable.
“This prosecution sends out a very clear message that we will take strong action against any landlord who doesn’t ensure the safety of their tenants.”
Read more about improvement notices.
View Full Article: Landlord fined after tenants spend Xmas and NY without water or decent heating
Evidence from solicitors?
Hello, I have a tenant who has contacted a solicitor regarding the condition of the flat’s drainage problem, mould, damp and mice infestation.
I received a letter from her solicitor just after Christmas regarding the problems she says she has.
View Full Article: Evidence from solicitors?
Flagship government campaign empowers social tenants to complain
A new government campaign will urge social housing tenants to complain about substandard housing as part of its flagship ‘Make it right’ campaign.
Housing Secretary Michael Gove is urging tenants to make their voices heard by complaining to their landlord before escalating an issue to the Housing Ombudsman if they are unhappy with the landlord’s final response.
View Full Article: Flagship government campaign empowers social tenants to complain
Fire test certificate needed?
Hello, I let a 5 bed semi detached. The house is over 2 floors, ground and first. I have radio controlled fire safety fitted in the hall and landing.
My local authority is asking for a fire test safety certificate.
View Full Article: Fire test certificate needed?
Luton landlord to pay thousands after ‘hindering’ property safety probe
A Luton landlord has been fined for the unusual offence of failing to provide documents relating to safety issues at his property.
Sarfraz Yousaf, of New Bedford Road, the director of Poplar Homes Ltd (pictured), was prosecuted by Luton Council after it reported that his reticence had hindered its investigation.
Last summer, the authority received a complaint relating to the poor condition of the house in St Peters Road. It alleged that the property did not have any fixed heating provision, no hot water and inadequate water services.
It was also reported that there were no smoke detectors, and the electric cooker was inappropriately connected and not conforming to current standards.
Failed
Poplar Homes (main image) was asked to provide the necessary information including ownership details as well as gas and electrical safety certificates, but repeatedly failed to do so and the council began legal proceedings.
Yousaf admitted the offence of not providing the correct and necessary documentation at Luton Magistrate’s Court. Poplar Homes was fined £3,977, plus a victim surcharge of £1,231, and costs of £508, while the landlord was fined £768, plus a victim surcharge of £307.
Documents
The firm has been tasked with making the necessary improvements to the property and the council is working to ensure these are carried out, according to councilor Tom Shaw (pictured), portfolio holder for housing. He says part of any investigation requires it to be satisfied that the necessary documents are held.
“Failure to demonstrate that is a serious offence in its own right,” adds Shaw. “The quality of the property investigated was not of a sufficiently high standard and we have demanded that the landlords resolve this as quickly as possible.”
Read more: how to ensure you property is compliant.
View Full Article: Luton landlord to pay thousands after ‘hindering’ property safety probe
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’