Instant Rent Offer and Free Money?
Following the success of our article Big Incentives to Assist with Housing Crisis we have given away THOUSANDS of pounds in FREE money to landlords as a combination of grants and incentives. We have a new list of eligible properties (see below).
The post Instant Rent Offer and Free Money? appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Instant Rent Offer and Free Money?
Labour’s Plan to axe permitted development rights a mistake
The Right-to-Buy your council home, if you were a sitting tenant, was a key Conservative policy introduced in the 1980 Housing Act by Margaret Thatcher. All of a sudden, people who had never had the option before could realistically think about owning their own home.
The post Labour’s Plan to axe permitted development rights a mistake appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Labour’s Plan to axe permitted development rights a mistake
Nationwide Foundation £1.2 m ‘Fair Housing Futures’ project hosted by Shelter
A £600,000 pot of funding launched in Greater Manchester aims to find real-life solutions to the housing problems facing thousands of vulnerable private renters in the city.
Funded by the Nationwide Foundation and hosted by housing charity Shelter
The post Nationwide Foundation £1.2 m ‘Fair Housing Futures’ project hosted by Shelter appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: Nationwide Foundation £1.2 m ‘Fair Housing Futures’ project hosted by Shelter
TPO complaints rise 16% in 2018
The Property Ombudsman (TPO) has released its 2018 annual report reflecting ever-increasing consumer demand for the service.
The report reveals TPO received a record number of enquiries in 2018 (29,023), up 22% on 2017. Of these, 4,246 went on to be formal complaints
The post TPO complaints rise 16% in 2018 appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: TPO complaints rise 16% in 2018
Section 21 – serving EPCs for HMO tenants?
Court Case:
With all the additional prescribed requirements introduced for assured shorthold tenancies of late, there is something of an inevitability that an abundance of cases will be coming to court in the future, testing potential “loopholes� in administration.
Tenants’ lawyers will without doubt attempt to stymie evictions for their clients (often publicly funded) because of landlords’ and agent’s failures to fulfil one or more of these numerous and rather complicated requirements.
Without good documentary evidence that all the many “boxes have been ticked� on setting up a new tenancy, landlords and agents will inevitably be stymied time and again.
A case in point was the one of Home Group Ltd v Henry (2018) which involved an HMO tenant who claimed that because he had not been issued with an EPC when he took up the tenancy, the landlord’s possession order under section 21 was invalid. Good try Henry!
Since the introduction of the energy performance regulations and the EPC, it’s always been a bit of a “grey� area within the legislation where HMOs are concerned, and whether an HMO tenant was required to be served an EPC as a prescribed requirement. After all it is very clear than tenants of single properties must be served an EPC at the time the tenancy is set-up.
Since October 2015 the Assured Shorthold Tenancy Notices and Prescribed Requirements (England) Regulations 2015, section 2a states the prescribed requirement: regulation 6(5) of the Energy Performance of Buildings (England and Wales) Regulations 2012(2) (requirement to provide an energy performance certificate to a tenant or buyer free of charge).
The question as to whether an EPC service is necessary for an HMO tenant revolves around the distinction between a tenant occupying a building, or a section or room within a building (bedsit), re the wording in The Energy Performance of Buildings (England and Wales) Regulations 2012, which states:
The relevant person must ensure that a valid energy performance certificate has been given free of charge to the person who ultimately becomes the buyer or tenant.
Mr Henry had an AST for a room in an HMO and argued that he should have been served an EPC when his tenancy started, and that therefore the landlord’s possession order was invalid. To support this argument Henry pointed to the fact the guidance in the new section 21 notice (form 6A) made no distinction between a single letting and an HMO, regarding the service of a valid section 21 notice.
The landlord, Home Group, on the other hand, argued that the requirement to provide an EPC under reg 6(5) of the 2012 Energy Regulations referred to the letting of a building or building unit and not a section within a building.
The relevant legislation refers to a “building� and a “building unit�, without mention of a section within a building, a room or bedsit, and on that basis the landlord argued the case.
The appeal was dismissed and the judge stated that while there was nothing expressly made in the 2005 AST regulations for HMOs tenancies, this would have required a new definition of EPCs to be relevant to a room, not a building or building unit.
He also stated that the explanatory note to the form 6A was guidance only and not in itself the law, and he thought these notes were misleading.
As this judgement was laid down by a county court appeal to a circuit judge, it is not binding and may not be the last word on the matter if further appeals transpire.
However, the reasoned argument seems pretty clear, so any future challenge, says Giles Peaker of Nearlylegal.co.uk, is “whether a room in an HMO falls under ‘building unit’ as designed or altered to be used separately, whether the MHCLG guidance on EPCs is right, and whether there is really any policy reason why a prospective HMO tenant should not be informed of the energy efficiency of the building.â€�
Acknowledgements to Giles Peaker of www.nearlylegal.co.uk
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Section 21 – serving EPCs for HMO tenants? | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Section 21 – serving EPCs for HMO tenants?
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,841)
Archives
- November 2024 (32)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords defy expectations of an ‘exodus’
- Bought a property at auction without details of existing tenant?
- Buying a property at auction with a sitting tenant?
- Government’s second homes policy doesn’t address the housing crisis
- Council inspects 500 PRS homes – and finds 2,000 issues