YOUR forum questions answered: Early termination fees and invoices
The hugely popular LandlordZONE forum is a friendly community where landlords share their experiences, exchange tips and ask for advice. Here we answer a recent question and ask the experts at Hamilton Fraser to give their best answer!
The question:
The tenant wants to leave the rental property before the end of the tenancy and is questioning whether the early termination costs the agent is asking for are reasonable. The landlord is happy to agree to an early termination of the tenancy, providing another tenant can be found and the tenant carries on paying the rent in the meantime. The tenant intends to help find a replacement tenant themselves. Are the costs proposed by the agent for early termination reasonable?
The answer:
Suzy Hershman (pictured, below), Head of Dispute Resolution at mydeposits, part of the Hamilton Fraser family, explains:
We’ve been getting a lot of queries relating to the topic of early termination fees at mydeposits recently, highlighting that many tenants, landlords and agents don’t yet fully understand the importance of providing evidence in this type of scenario, following the implementation of the Tenant Fees Act (TFA).One of the changes the TFA introduced when it came into force in 2019, was changes to early termination fees. Although the TFA prohibited agents and landlords from charging fees to tenants, the act clearly lists early termination fees as a ‘permitted fee’ – one that can be charged to a tenant.
But, although early termination fees can be charged to a tenant, any early termination charges must be reasonable, clear and backed up by evidence of their actual costs. This is quite a significant change – before the TFA came into force, if a tenant disputed early termination fees and a case went to a mydeposits adjudicator, we would award if the tenant had simply been given a cost breakdown of the re-letting costs and any commission fees. The tenant could then choose whether to accept and move out or disagree and stay. If the tenant disputed the fees, we would have been unlikely to accept a dispute, although we might have taken a view in relation to the ‘reasonable’ test (which I’ll explain below).
The key change, following the TFA, is that agents and landlords must prove that they are out of pocket as a consequence of the tenant ending the tenancy early, by providing evidence in the form of invoices for the actual costs incurred. Before the TFA, we did not require invoices to make an award. Now, if the tenant disputes the proposed cost, the landlord or agent will only be able to charge fees if they have invoices to prove the loss.
Agents may generate their own invoices if the property is fully managed, or landlords and agents may have separate invoices for costs such as marketing the property or referencing prospective new tenants. All of this will be valuable evidence when it comes to proving reasonable costs.
We do have some discretion when making decisions, and this is where the ‘reasonable’ test comes in. This could apply to the specific question in the scenario outlined on the Forum, if the tenant is successful in finding a replacement tenant. It is likely to be unreasonable to award a claim of £750.00 for re-letting fees where a tenant has asked to leave early, disagreed with the proposed costs, and found the new tenant themselves before leaving. My view is that a landlord or agent would have difficulty proving this is their actual loss.
Likewise, with commission fees, it would be unreasonable to make an award where the evidence shows the agent has agreed to waive the outstanding commission in return for re-letting the property and fully managing it.
Although this approach adds more work for landlords and agents at the evidence gathering stage, ahead of a discussion or dispute, this more thorough way of doing things ties in with the transparency and clarity required by the Tenant Fees Act, and everyone knows where they stand, the tenant included.
At mydeposits, we’ve been getting a lot of questions recently on this topic in response to our new Early termination fees guide, which also provides more information on what you need to know about both re-letting and commission fees. You can read a more detailed article are sending out to our members on early termination fees and the importance of providing evidence and invoices here.
Join LandlordZONE’s forum here.
Hamilton Fraser supports landlords, letting agents and tenants by offering a range of solutions and thought leadership to help them navigate the private rented sector. Most recognised in the private rented sector for providing award winning landlord insurance, the Hamilton Fraser family includes Total Landlord Insurance, mydeposits, the Property Redress Scheme, Client Money Protect, Landlord Action, Ome, HF Assist and Total Landlord Mortgages.
Subscribe here for the latest landlord news and receive tips from industry experts.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – YOUR forum questions answered: Early termination fees and invoices | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: YOUR forum questions answered: Early termination fees and invoices
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’