What’s the progress on fire regulations in high rise buildings?
Since Grenfell there have been endless forums, reviews, reports, consultations and, even so, any real action has been painfully slow. See below for the latest situation.
The Hackett Review
The independent review started in 2018 into fire safety management in England and Wales was led by Dame Judith Hackitt. This resulted in findings that were damning. The review found that the existing fire safety regulations in high-rise properties were ‘not fit for purpose’.
“I have been shocked by some of the practices and I am convinced of the need for a new intelligent system of regulation and enforcement for high-rise and complex buildings which will encourage everyone to do the right thing and will hold to account those who try to cut corners.” said Dame Judith Hackett in here report.
Initially more that 400 high-rise blocks were identified as having inadequate and unsafe aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding. This is a type of external cladding of the same type that caught fire and rapidly engulfed the whole building at Grenfell Tower, with the tragic loss of so many lives. Since then more buildings, their construction and materials have been found to be defective.
Leaseholders, so far, paying the price
The Building a Safer Future report summarised Dame Hackitt’s findings. What followed in December 2018 was a nationwide ban on the use of combustible materials. AMC cladding was banned in high-rise residential buildings.
This led to what is now a major cladding scandal. It’s an ongoing social crisis that followed both the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017 and the Bolton Cube fire in November 2019. These fires with the horrific loss of life in one, and the Hackitt review, have revealed that large numbers of buildings have been clad in dangerously combustible materials, and now its the leaseholders paying the price.
Many buildings have been found to be non-compliant in other fire-safety building requirements, such as missing cavity barriers around windows and a lack of fire break barriers, which are intended to prevent fires from spreading horizontally and vertically into neighbouring flats. That’s not to mention simple measures such as faulty and missing fire alarm systems, fire doors, closers and extinguishers etc.
Immediate fire risk
The report findings led to a recognition that these buildings could potentially be posing an immediate fire risk to residents.
Leaseholders of flats now find themselves in the invidious position of facing extensive and costly remedial work. Many are trapped in accommodation they would like to move out of but cannot do so because they are unmortgagable. In the meantime, sky high buildings insurance premiums, and the outrageous cost of paying for ‘waking watches’, paying people to patrol buildings 24/7 to monitor the building for fires, are bank breaking.
In February this year the UK government pledged over £5 billion towards remediation works, but even this staggering amount will be nowhere near enough to cover the extensive costs across the country, with much of the cost to-date falling on the shoulders of individual leaseholders of flats. These people, often young people just starting out in adult life, are potentially having to go into massive debt because they innocently and unwittingly purchased these unlawfully constructed homes.
The coming legislative changes
The Building Safety Bill has reached committee stage in the House of Commons. As it is currently drafted, its provisions will change building safety laws and place new duties on those responsible for the safety of high-rise residential buildings.
As a preview for those affected by the likely changes, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has published Safety case principles for high-rise residential buildings subtitled, Building safety reform – Early key messages. HSE say that adapting to a new regulatory regime will be challenging and it is collaborating with the government and other partners to help those affected to take “sensible, risk-based, proportionate steps that ensure the safety of the people in and around your buildings”.
HSE envisages the necessary measures will include “a combination of measures that work together to prevent and mitigate the spread of fire and structural failure, and the safety management system which keeps these measures in place and in good working order”.
Fire risk guidance
The Home Office has published Fire safety in purpose-built blocks of flats – Updated guidance (24 September 2021). It warns that the guide was first produced in 2011, summarising the legislation, guidance and best practice at the time, so should now be viewed as “no longer comprehensive”.
A revised version of this guide is expected in early 2022. Provisions relating to vulnerable persons have been redacted pending the outcome of the government’s Personal Emergency Evacuations Plan consultation. In the meantime, the current guide remains available to fire safety professionals, “as it contains relevant and useful information for purpose-built blocks of flats”.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – What’s the progress on fire regulations in high rise buildings? | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: What’s the progress on fire regulations in high rise buildings?
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’