Up to £1.2 billion in deposits could be unaccounted for!
The latest research by Hamilton Fraser’s
deposit replacement provider, Ome, has revealed the huge sums of tenant money
that is estimated as being held by landlords and agents without protection via
a deposit protection scheme.
Ome’s sister company, mydeposits, manages 25%
of the total deposit protection market and their latest records show they
currently protect more than 876,000 live deposits, suggesting there is an
estimated 3.5m deposits protected across the entire market which equates to
some £3.9bn in value!
This means that with 3.5m protected tenancy
to a value of £3.9bn, the average tenant is paying £1,139 for a tenancy
deposit.
Ome compared these statistics with the latest
English Housing Survey report which shows an estimated 4.60m tenancies in the private
rental sector in 2019. With only 3.5m of these tenancy deposits accounted for
in protection schemes, there are potentially 1.1m tenancies that either have
not had a deposit protected, do not have deposits, or are using deposit
replacement products. At worst, there could be as much as £1.2bn in deposit
monies that are not protected.
However, the latest report
into deposit protection compliance rates by the Center for Economics and
Business Research (CEBR) estimates that 14.5% of all deposits held are not
protected by landlords or agents. This means of the estimated 1.1m tenancy
deposits that are unaccounted for, just over 500,000 (14.5%) cash deposits
could currently be unprotected, putting £578m at risk.
However, this would suggest there are still
some 586,000 tenancies in the private rental sector that are neither compliant
nor unprotected, suggesting a growing preference amongst landlords to ditch the
traditional cash deposit.
Landlord’s deposit taking
habits are changing
This could be explained by two factors:
firstly the increased acceptance of deposit replacement products such as Ome
and, secondly, some landlords opting to request no deposit at all, with the
latest research showing as many as 600,000 tenancies in the private rental
sector currently opting for one of these two options.
The lack of a rental deposit is already a
theme becoming popular with “Build-to-Rent” providers who operate large numbers
of rental units and forgo a traditional deposit, mitigating the risk by
providing additional complimentary services such as cleaning to their tenants.
As the industry becomes more
service-orientated and changes to legislation lead to tenants receiving more
consumer protection, landlords and agents are looking at ways in which they can
streamline their businesses, with innovation in the deposit sector looking to
be fertile ground.
But for those 500,000 landlords across the
nation that have taken a deposit and failed to place it in a compliant
protection scheme, there are consequences. They run the risk of fines of up to
three times the deposit plus the deposit itself. At £1,139 for the average new
deposit, it could cost them to the tune of £4,556 per unprotected deposit!
Co-founder of Ome, Matthew Hooker,
commented:
“The reality is that the private rental
sector is changing, and has been changing gradually through the formal
introduction of deposit protection in 2006 and the subsequent launch of the
more traditional protection schemes.
It’s impossible to tell just how many
deposits are still sat unprotected in the bank accounts of either rogue
landlords or agents but based on market data we can make a conservative
estimate that this total value runs into the hundreds of millions of pounds.
We’d always advise tenants to check which
deposit protection scheme your agent or landlord is part of and to make sure
they give you the documentation confirming the deposit is protected.
For landlords and agents that would rather
not have to worry about the often arduous and risky process of managing a
deposit, we’d recommend looking at products such as our own deposit replacement
membership rather than hoping they don’t get caught. It removes the need to
take cash deposits but keeps you protected should the worst happen.”
Data on Protected Tenancy Deposits | |||
Live Deposits Protected | Total Value | Average Deposit Paid | |
876,249 | £998,048,056 | £1,139 | |
3,504,996 | £3,992,192,224 | £1,139.00 | |
Hamilton Fraser’s Data |
Hamilton Fraser’s data (25% market share) multiplied by 4. |
Total Value Divided by Number of Deposits |
|
Data on Total and Unaccounted for Deposits |
|||
Total Tenancies | Number of Deposits Accounted For | Number of Unaccounted Tenancies | Value of Unaccounted Tenancies |
4,600,000 | 3,504,996 | 1,095,004 | £1,247,209,556 |
English Housing Survey |
Based on Total Deposits Protected in the Above Table |
Based on Total Tenancies Minus Number Accounted For |
Number Unaccounted Tenancies Multiplied by Average Deposit Above |
Data on Potentially Unprotected and Unaccounted for Deposits |
|||
% of Non-Compliant Tenancies (Unprotected) | Number of Unprotected Deposits | Value of Unprotected Tenancies | Deposits Completely Unaccounted For |
14.50% | 508224 | £578,867,614 | 586,780 |
Source: CEBR |
14.5% of Total Deposits Unaccounted for in Above Table |
Number of Unprotected Tenancies Multiplied by Average Deposit Paid |
The Difference Between Total Unaccounted Tenancies and Total Unprotected Tenancies |
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Up to £1.2 billion in deposits could be unaccounted for! | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Up to £1.2 billion in deposits could be unaccounted for!
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’