The Great Pet Debate
Pets in Lets:
It’s the age-old debate between landlords and tenants. Should a landlord allow a tenant to rent their property if they have a pet? If we look at the ‘No pets allowed’ plastered over every advert and a resolute mantra from lettings agents, it’s clear that most landlords do not allow pets in their buy-to-let. But perhaps it’s time to reconsider this stance, with a few conditions of course.
Dogs Trust conducted research and found that 78% of pet owners had difficulties finding a rental property that would accept their furry friend. Plus, 1 in 3 property owners could not find anywhere that would accept their pet. It’s also reported that tenants with pets take up to 7 times longer to find a rental property that is willing to accept them. There are good reasons as to why a landlord would be hesitant to accept a pet:
- Damage to property such as ripped carpets, shredded curtains and scratched wooden floors
- Pets, particularly dogs, could cause a disturbance to neighbours with late night barking
- It may affect tenants in the future if they are allergic to animals
- It may cost more to clean the property once the tenants have left
- Flea infestation, which is expensive to remedy
- For a fully furnished let, cats and dogs are likely to damage furniture from chewing and scratching
This list is hard to ignore and may give many landlords the resolution to continue rejecting tenants with pets. However, the Dogs Trust research also found that 47% of landlords didn’t give any reason for not allowing a tenant to keep a pet. Perhaps the ‘No pets’ mantra has simply been reinforced in the industry without real thought to individual circumstances.
A naughty 14% of tenants keep pets in a property, without asking for their landlord’s consent, so perhaps a reasonable agreement, such as a higher deposit or a guarantee the property will be professionally cleaned, would be a better approach?
The private rental sector now accounts for 21% of the housing market, more than 5 million, households. And this figure is only set to increase as house prices rise faster than wages. And from Upad’s research, 40% tenants have been renting for 4 or more years – showing that longer term renting is here to stay. With that in mind, should the no pets rule be relaxed, to allow tenants to settle into a rented home just a property owner would be able to?
What, you may be asking, are the advantages to letting to tenants with pets?
- Pet owners are likely to stay longer at a property, considering the difficulties they face finding a suitable rental
- They may be more likely to look after the property well, to prove that their pet won’t cause any problems
- Landlords could charge a higher rent. A Upad tenant survey found that 24% of pet owners would be willing to pay that extra rent
- The property may let faster, avoiding dreaded void periods, with so many pet owners struggling to find a rented a property to accept them.
You may not be convinced, and we don’t blame you. It’s important to consider the potential damage caused by pets and protect your investment. If you do decide to accept pets, make sure to ask for a higher deposit to cover any damage caused and carry out regular inspections to make sure the property is looked after.
You could also ask for vet records, to ensure the pet is up-to-date with vaccines and flea treatment. We’d recommend asking the tenant to agree to pay for a professional clean at the end of the tenancy, and this will avoid any deposit disputes over cleaning.
But always ensure you have a detailed, professional inventory check-in and check-out to show any changes in the property condition. If your “no pets” resolve may be softening, LetwithPets offers fantastic advice on protecting your investment if you do decide to allow pets – they offer free information on pet clauses, pet references and pet deposits.
This article has been supplied to LandlordZONE® by online letting agents Upad
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – The Great Pet Debate | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: The Great Pet Debate
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’