Tenants using the home to run a business – how safe are you?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II provides security of tenure to tenants of premises occupied for business purposes, or mixed residential and business purposes.
Under the provisions of the ’54 Act, it is possible for a lease or tenancy of a property, used for both residential and business purposes, to be a business tenancy giving security of tenure. This means that residential tenants working from home could inadvertently be given rights to remain in the premises. This is particularly the risk where no written agreement exists or when it is deficient in some way.
This has long been a concern when letting under the Housing Act 1988 assured shorthold tenancy (AST) when the tenant works from home. Whilst most landlords and tenants are unaware of this anomaly, it is nevertheless a concern.
However, this has been recognised by Government in The Small Business Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 which received Royal Assent on 26 March 2015. The Act consists of a raft of measures aimed at making the UK a good place to start and grow a business.
All good residential tenancy agreements have hitherto prohibited the use of domestic dwellings for business purposes to avoid any potential argument about whether the tenancy is protected by the security of tenure provisions in the 1954 Act.
But, where the landlord knows that a business is being conducted from the premises, it well might be argued that continuation of such practice has been condoned and agreed.
The intention of the 2015 Act therefore is to remove the incentive for landlords to include a prohibition by providing that a tenancy of a dwelling house where a “home business” is carried on will not fall within part II of the 1954 Act.
This is to be known as a “home business tenancy” which will permit the right kind of business for residential premises, a “business of a kind which can reasonably be carried on at home”, but “no other type of business”.
The Act therefore is designed to encourage businesses by giving “greater flexibility around home working” and more options in terms of where the business is carried on and where partners and employees can be based.
What is a home business tenancy?
The Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 (SBEE) defines it as when:
- a dwelling-house is let as a separate dwelling;
- the tenant is an individual; and
- the terms of the tenancy require:
- the tenant to occupy the dwelling-house as a home;
- permit a home business to be carried on in the dwelling house, or permit the immediate landlord to give consent for a home business to be carried on in the dwelling house; and
- do not permit a business other than a home business to be carried on in the dwelling-house.
The Act defines a home as: “any business of a kind which might reasonably be carried on at home”.
Certain specific businesses are excluded, for example, the supply of alcohol, and further regulations are to follow on this.
Until these regulations are finalised and passed by the Secretary of State, expected by April 2016, a degree of uncertainty over this exists for both landlords and tenants as there are many situations where this is unclear. For example:
- The tenant works full time but brings work home regularly
- The employed tenant regularly spends part of the working week working from home
- The tenant is a sole trader making small products at home and sells them
- An employed tenant who runs an eBay business from home storing the products in the dwelling
- An employed tenant who runs an eBay business from home but storing the products elsewhere.
- A self-employed mobile hairdresser who also has clients come to the dwelling.
- A self-employed chiropodist who has clients come to the dwelling.
- A full time employed tenant who runs a consultancy business on the side, uses the home address for his company’s registered office.
There is much ambiguity here that still needs clarification and it is not clear whether a lease of a flat will be included in the provisions, if in any doubt your should get the advice of a solicitor.
It remains to be seen just how many landlords permit their tenants to run home businesses, so caution is recommended here, but as home working in now becoming the norm it is sensible not to lose tents by refusing suitable businesses.
The 1954 Act has provisions for “contracting out of the Act” in the case of all business tenancies, a procedure where the tenant and landlord agree before the lease is signed that the tenancy will be contractual and the security of tenure provisions of the Act will not apply. This is a safe way to go.
If there is any doubt, landlords are at this time recommended to seek a contracting out agreement and you should seek legal advice before letting if you are unsure. See Part 35 of the Act – Exclusion of home businesses from Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 here
View Full Article: Tenants using the home to run a business – how safe are you?
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’