SPOTLIGHT: Why it’s time to regulate the UK’s unlicensed evictions specialists
In the UK anyone offering a specialist eviction service can operate as as a solicitor or firm licensed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). Or it can operate without that stamp approval, albeit without the legal authority to complete many parts of the process.
This has created a grey area into which many unlicensed firms, many calling themselves ‘lawyers’, have leapt offering cut-price services that often fail to deliver the same level of service or competencies as a licenced operation.
This grey area exists because the SRA’s remit means it can only deal with the actions of those solicitors or the firms they run under the Solicitors Act 1974.
And even if an unlicensed firm employs an in-house solicitor – which many do – they still cannot provide ‘reserved’ (see definition below) activity through organisations that the SRA does not regulate.
What does reserved mean?
Certain legal roles are ‘reserved activities’ which only qualified and licenced solicitors can complete, and that includes key parts of the possession proceedings.
A non-licenced company can assist and advise, but its representatives are barred from representing clients in court or engaging in certain legal procedures.
---
The SRA told LandlordZONE: “Our regulation is about protecting the users of legal services who have engaged a solicitor firm. We have no remit with landlords or their agents if those agents are not solicitors.”
There are dozens and possibly hundreds of companies who offer an unlicenced eviction service in the UK, often including the word ‘lawyer’ in their company names or websites who continue unchecked or policed.
“They are easy to spot because they are usually much cheaper than licenced eviction specialists,” says Paul Shamplina, star of Channel 5 TV show Nightmare Tenants, Slum Landlords.
“But all too often we pick up cases from landlords who have gone for the cheap option but who then find out that the paperwork has not been prepared properly and their cases are thrown out by the judge.”
Test case
This situation has been continuing for years, despite a test case in 2018 concerning a possession case in Birmingham (Kassam vs Singh) during which the judge made it clear that he considered the way in which unlicensed companies operate to be unlawful under the Legal Services Act 2007.
As that case also highlighted, procedural mistakes made by unregulated eviction companies can be both costly and waste a lot of time for landlords.
And without the indemnity insurance afforded by an SRA licence, landlords have little recourse other than to take the company to court to recoup their losses.
Think carefully
“We advise landlords to think carefully before instructing any firm to carry out possession services to ensure they are working with a reputable company,” a spokesperson from the NRLA told LandlordZONE.
“This should include seeking recommendations through word of mouth and searching for reviews on reliable websites. It is important also to ensure that before agreeing to use such services, landlords understand clearly the costs and what will be provided.”
Little progress has been made towards regulating or licensing the entire sector (rather than just parts of it) since the Kassam vs Singh case.
MoJ register
But official action could be forthcoming. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) last week told an industry conference that it is considering whether to create a register of unregulated providers of legal services and give their clients access to redress if things go wrong.
Peter Rowlinson, head of UK legal services policy at the MoJ said that it doesn’t make sense that while the client of a lawyer advising on a will, for example, had the protection of both regulation, indemnity insurance and access to the Legal Ombudsman, the client of an unregulated provider did not.
In the private rental market, this issue of parallel ‘legal services’ provision is particularly pressing because many more landlords will soon be seeking help as they attempt to remove tenants who have defaulted on their rent before, during or after Covid.
Tim Frome (right), Head of Legal at Landlord Action, also says some of the cases he deals with involve letting agents who claim to have the in-house expertise to complete evictions but which in reality do not, or who use an unregulated specialist, in both cases in the hope of making extra revenue.
LandlordZONE put this to ARLA Propertymark, but it declined to comment.
“We are seeing clients come to us after using an unlicenced evictions specialist which has ended up making their situation worse after they have made basic procedural legal mistakes or, in some worse-case scenarios, blatantly lied to a landlord about their capabilities and the progress of the eviction,” says Frome.
“It is then left to licenced companies like ours to unpick the mess after the landlord has realised often too late they may have to go back to square one after months of unnecessary waiting and expense.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – SPOTLIGHT: Why it’s time to regulate the UK’s unlicensed evictions specialists | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: SPOTLIGHT: Why it’s time to regulate the UK’s unlicensed evictions specialists
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’