REVEALED: Surge in no-win, no-fee legal firms urging tenants to take their landlords to court over deposits
A leading housing law expert has urged private landlords to ensure that their tenants’ deposits are properly protected via one of the government’s approved schemes after witnessing a surge in no-win, no-fee solicitors entering the private rental sector.
Julie Ford (pictured), who runs landlord services firm Gothard Rowe, says she’s seen a rise in the number of adverts on social media from ‘ambulance chasing’ legal firms urging tenants to check whether their landlord has protected their deposit, promising ‘thousands of pounds’ in potential recompense.
This is because, under the Housing Act 2004, tenants can be due up to three times their original deposit in compensation if the money has not been protected properly and due process followed.
But Ford says this is only the maximum, and that the vast majority of landlords who have breached the regulations will only have to pay 1x times the deposit and not three for a first-time breach.
“Many of these legal firms also ramp up their costs, often without proof of how they arrived at the final bill, and try to put this through the court too,” she says.
“I’ve handled other cases where these firms have put through costs and claims totalling up to £20,000, and in one case £32,000 but in these cases, the landlords ended up paying a fraction of that.
“We had one landlord who faced a £10,500 claim but we settled before the court hearing for £650.”
Claims surge
Most experts agree that this surge in claim activity around deposits and other housing issues such as property disrepair has been prompted by Covid as general legal firms have seen other work dry up during the lockdowns and they have turned to the housing sector to generate revenue.
“They thought deposits and other housing matters were a lucrative and easy new income stream – but housing law is complicated and time-consuming and they often don’t have the expertise in their field that you need,” adds Ford.
“For example, sometimes they don’t realise the significant amount of paperwork that is required for a tenant to make a claim against a landlord.
“I’ve also seen several of these firms using techniques banned by the SRA’s Code of Conduct – for example not passing on ‘offers to settle’ from landlords to their tenant clients in the hope of getting a higher settlement in court.
Essex case
Her comments follow a recent case covered by LandlordZONE of an Essex landlord who faces a £10,000 fine and costs bill after it turned out that her letting agent had protected her former tenant’s deposit six months after they moved in, way over the 30-day minimum period.
The tenant then took her to court via a no-win, no-fee legal firm, having been promised three times their original deposit as an award, or around £5,000.
Read more: Have you protected your tenant's deposit properly?
Ford has now taken up the case and says she expects to dramatically reduce the likely fine and costs claim bill at a hearing this week.
But she urges landlords to know their basics particularly when it comes to deposits regardless of whether they use a letting agency or not.
“It can be stressful and time-consuming to fend off these claims and the letters these legal firms send out are usually very aggressive, so getting the deposit paperwork completed properly in the first place is a better option,” she says.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – REVEALED: Surge in no-win, no-fee legal firms urging tenants to take their landlords to court over deposits | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: REVEALED: Surge in no-win, no-fee legal firms urging tenants to take their landlords to court over deposits
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,923)
Archives
- December 2024 (50)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Housing market to be busy in 2025 but doubts cast over Labour’s 1.5 million homes target
- Property Answers: What’s Next For 2025?
- Corporate landlords will replace buy to let landlords next year
- How Good Is Your Accountant? Essential Questions for Landlords
- NRLA slams Prime Minister for criticising landlords amid housing crisis