Retail property expert is scathing on Government’s High Street plan
The Government’s latest plans to put new life back into Britain’s “dying” high streets are “short-sighted and raise huge concerns, that’s according to a North East retail property consultancy, @Retail.
The regionally based property consultants who claim to be “changing the face of the North East’s high streets,” seem to think that the Government is driving the wrong way up a one-way street with their latest proposals in the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill.
In particular one of the 12 key “missions” that Michael Gove has unveiled in the Government’s flagship Levelling Up White Paper, aimed at shifting the government’s focus and resources to Britain’s “forgotten communities,” is giving powers to local authorities to force landlords to rent out long-term vacant properties to prospective tenants, such as local businesses or community groups.
One in every 5 shops vacant
The North East, along with much of Britain, has seen a large rise in the number of vacant shops, and in some locations this is above the national average.
The British Retail Consortium/Local Data Company study is the latest where worrying North East data comes at a same time that other parts of the country are seeing improvements as they start to recover from the pandemic.
It underscores the Government desire to take some drastic action. But, indicates Ian Thurlbeck, director at the Newcastle-based retail property consultants, @retail, the government is going up the wrong street with this Bill.
The @retail agency which offers advice on aspects of retail property, including High Street Agency, Shopping Centre Leasing, Investment, Development, Professional Services and a strategic retail Consultancy says: “We are unique in our ability to offer ‘on the spot’ advice from a team of local experts, all of whom are from the Region and have spent the majority of their careers immersed within it.”
Major concerns
The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill raises major concerns – under the Bill, landlords will be compelled to let out retail units that have been vacant for longer than six months, says Mr Thurlbeck.
The Government’s aim is to quickly reduce the number of boarded-up shops, while at the same time create new opportunities for local small businesses and community groups, and help to increase footfall and spending in these North East town centres.
But Ian Thurlbeck has described the move as “an unrealistic proposal that fails to take into account regional differences.” He thinks that this will result in hundreds of empty properties being auctioned off to unscrupulous tenants.
Mr Thurlbeck comments further:
“This short-sighted scheme fails to address some fundamental issues, placing the burden directly on property owners and feeding off the general sense of mistrust by people in so-called ‘greedy” landlords.
“It raises many unanswered questions. For instance, what if the tenant who wins the auction is a rogue, pays none of the outgoings and trashes the property – who picks up the bill then? And do the local authorities tasked with running the auctions have the requisite experience and expertise? Will they be willing to take responsibility if things go wrong?”
Mr Thurlbeck thinks that there are now fewer retail operators requiring high street space than previously, but the perception that hundreds of North East high streets face terminal decline is simply untrue, he says.
“There is a popular misconception that our high streets are littered with empty shops, leading to a downward spiral of neglect, decay and blight. This is not the case and here in the North East, we see many high streets that are thriving and as busy as anywhere else in the country.
“Moreover, regional vacancy rates are in line with national trends and in our experience, high street retail activity in Newton Aycliffe, Durham City, Bishop Auckland, Peterlee, Chester le Street, Stanley, Consett, Seaham and Crook among other places, where we have lately updated the council with vacancy rates for these town centres, remains robust.
“There are pockets within some of these town centres where vacancy rates exceed the national average, but I would say that this is as much a national issue as it is a North East one.”
Mr Thurlbeck also has said that landlords should not be blamed for long-term retail vacancies landlords cannot afford to have their properties vacant for extended periods – in his experience, @retail has seen 99% of landlords keen to see their property let as soon as possible.
Further, he advises:
“The alternative is to suffer the cost of rates, repairs, insurance, security and maintenance. In our experience, most landlords faced with limited demand are prepared to agree short-term, rent-free leases with charities, local organisations and other groups, who can demonstrate they will be reliable and responsible occupiers. This helps to offset these costs while searching for a more sustainable solution.
“Indeed, landlords are often keen to mitigate their outgoings on vacant space and most of @retail’s clients who are faced with a lack of demand at market rents will let to charities and other organisations simply to mitigate rates.”
[Image: Tyne Bridge, Newcastle at night]
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Retail property expert is scathing on Government’s High Street plan | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Retail property expert is scathing on Government’s High Street plan
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,860)
Archives
- November 2024 (51)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Demand for accessible rental homes surges – LRG
- The landlord exodus is fuelling a rental crisis
- Landlords enjoy booming yields – Paragon
- Landlords: Get Your Properties Sold Fast and Cash in the Bank before the New Year!
- Exclusive: Will the government delay Section 21 to social housing providers and not private landlords?