Refinancing buy to let properties – Section 24 issues
Before we go into the
details please allow me to point out that Simon Misiewicz nor Optimise
Accountants are financial advisors or mortgage brokers. The information
provided below is for educational purposes from a tax perspective. The
information contained in this article does not constitute as financial advice.
1. Can
you remortgage on a buy to let?
It is entirely
possible that a property may be refinanced. An extra amount of equity will have
been built up if the property increased in value. A property may have increased
in value for a number of reasons:
– Property values in
the area have increased over time
– The property owner
added value to the property (more bedrooms, extensions, additional garages etc)
– The property may
have originally been purchased below market value
Data from UK Finance
shows that landlords remortgaged 14,700 properties in July.
A buy to let landlord
may be able to pull more money out of their existing mortgage provided that
there is equity in the property and the mortgage holder has a good credit
rating.
The
stress test criteria when refinancing your buy to let mortgages
The last thing to
consider is the % of mortgage interest repayment rate. Some lenders wish to see
an interest cover (stress testing) of 145%. This means that your net rent needs
to be 1.45 times more than the mortgage interest charges. Lenders may not lend
to you if the net rent does not meet or exceed their % criteria.
£10,000 net rent
£6,000 mortgage
interest costs
The above shows that
there is 1.67 times cover to meet the stress test condition of 145%. A buy to
let landlord wanted to increase the mortgage and the interest charges increase
as shown below:
£10,000 net rent
£7,500 interest rate
The stress test
criteria is no longer met. This is because the cover is reduced from 1.67 to
1.33 (£10,000 divided by £7,500). It is unlikely that the lender would approve
the remortgage application.
2.
Do I need a deposit for a remortgage?
You will need to find
a deposit on any property that you pay. The amount of deposit that you require
will be from 10% to 50% (or even more) based on the below
– Your credit report
and credit rating, which you can investigate using Experian or Equifax
– The condition of the
property. The greater the disrepair the greater reassurances bank will require
– The risk profile of
the investment. The greater risk to the banks will mean more deposit
– How you are going to
buy the property. If the property is in your name or in a company with other
Joint Venture partners. The amount of deposit needed may be less if the buy to
let property is purchased in your own name.
– The age of the
mortgage holder. The greater the age the more equity the banks will want to
see.
Refinancing
a buy to let mortgage to release cash for a deposit on a property
investment
Let us look at an
example. John has identified a property in Birmingham. It is a four-bedroom
house and is near the university. The property will be rented out to students.
There is a high demand so renting the property that is refurbished to a high
standard should not be a problem.
£200,000 house price
£50,000 deposit being
25% of the property value
The £50,000 can come
out of John’s savings account. John could refinance an existing buy to let
property that is just down the road in Birmingham, which is also let out to
students. He purchased the property 8 years ago when the house price was
£140,000. John knows that the property is in even better condition than the one
he is looking to buy. He speaks with his mortgage broker and they agree to
re-finance the existing property
£140,000 original
house purchase
£200,000 latest valuation on the
property
£60,000 increased the
value of the property.
The £60,000 allows him
to take out 75% as a re-mortgage. John decides to proceed with this
re-mortgage. John is now able to use the £45,000 for the deposit on the new
house.
£50,000 deposit
required
£45,000 released as a remortgage in
the existing buy to let property
£5,000 more required
for John to complete the purchase
John now only needs to
pull out £5,000 from his savings account to buy the new property because he
refinanced the existing Birmingham buy to let property.
The mortgage interest
cost associated with the refinancing is allowed to be offset against his
property income as it is used for investment/business purposes.
3. What
are the implications of refinancing a buy to let property because of Section 24
mortgage interest relief cap?
Landlords from 2020/21
will not be able to offset the mortgage interest costs against their property
income. From 6th April 2020, buy to let property investors will only receive a
tax reducer of 20% of the mortgage interest costs. This means that high rate
taxpayers will lose 20% tax relief on mortgage interest costs. Additional rate
taxpayers will lose 25% tax relief on the mortgage interest costs.
You may not be able to
offset the full amount of mortgage interest costs if you refinance a property
and a high rate / additional rate taxpayer.
From the above
example, we could see that John already has one property in Birmingham and
looking to buy another. The first property had the following characteristics
£140,000 property
value
£105,000 mortgage
The mortgage had an
interest rate of 2%. This means that the mortgage interest costs per year were
£2,100. In 2016/17 John’s tax return looked like this from the one property in
Birmingham.
£15,000 income
£2,100 mortgage
interest costs
£5,000 other costs
£7,900 profit
As a high rate
taxpayer, he knew that 40% of the profits would be paid to HMRC. The amount of
tax that John had to pay on his Birmingham property was £3,160. This leaves
John with £4,740
6th
April 2020 mortgage interest relief cap impact in John’s property
If we roll forward a
few years we will see that the mortgage interest costs will not be allowed to
be offset against his property income.
£15,000 income
£5,000 other costs
£10,000 profit
£4,000 tax
(£420) tax reducer at 20% of the
mortgage interest costs of £2,100
£3,580 net tax to pay
We can see that John
now has £420 more tax to pay.
If John were to
refinance the original property and increase the buy to let mortgage by £50,000
the following would apply
£1,500 additional
interest because of the remortgage.
£300 tax relief
£300 lost tax relief
because of the tax changes
In this instance, John
is paying more tax as a result of the original mortgage. He is also paying more
interest on the remortgage without the benefit of the full tax reliefs.
To read more property tax saving ideas visit Optimise
Accountants blog page
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Refinancing buy to let properties – Section 24 issues | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Refinancing buy to let properties – Section 24 issues
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,862)
Archives
- November 2024 (53)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- NRLA blast Housing Minister’s court system remarks
- Why Do You Really Want to Invest in Property?
- Demand for accessible rental homes surges – LRG
- The landlord exodus is fuelling a rental crisis
- Landlords enjoy booming yields – Paragon