OPINION: Would periodic tenancies change everything for landlords?
The cost of living crisis shows no signs of easing so it’s not surprising that our data has revealed that tenants are staying put for longer, unwilling to risk rent increases and uncertainty over unsecured accommodation.
But at the same time, the government wants to bring in periodic tenancies as the standard and change how tenants are evicted, as proposed within its Renters Reform White Paper.
These changes are not necessarily a bad thing. For example, If you suddenly need to regain possession of your property, or decide you want a change, a periodic tenancy speeds up this process as you don’t have to wait until the end of a fixed period.
It will also help to recruit tenants who are on the lookout for a short lease contract, who otherwise wouldn’t be available to you.
For tenants, periodic tenancies mean that they will not have to give as much notice prior to leaving a property, given that the contract will be rolling, but this could present a number of challenges that should be considered by agents and landlords.
Shorter leases
Understandably, periodic tenancies are more likely to attract tenants looking for more transient, shorter leases.
Having a high turnover of tenants will not only cost more in terms of referencing and marketing, but it’ll also mean landlords must deal with a shorter turnaround time if a tenant decides to vacate unexpectedly, which will likely increase void periods and cost money.
If your tenant moves out during a ‘notice to quit period, landlords may be liable for paying council tax for the property for that month.
But this can be avoided, by ensuring you have a contractual periodic tenancy agreement in place to ensure this remains the tenant’s responsibility for a given length of time.
With periodic tenancies opening up the rental market to an expanded pool of people, reports of falsified documents and disingenuous applications are on the increase.
Fraud
Fraudsters are becoming more sneaky at using the tech readily available to them to fake documents and contracts.
Agents must both recognise this as an issue and seek to address it quickly, educating landlords on why thorough checks and due diligence are as important as ever.
Although they come with their own set of challenges, periodic tenancies can be a good idea for all parties, offering increased flexibility and reducing the number of administrative tasks required throughout a tenancy.
The lettings landscape is mid-shift, as a combined result of the pandemic, cost of living crisis and renters reform white paper.
What this means long-term is yet to be seen, but what is certain is that landlords must be vigilant and stay ahead of the ball in order to maintain consistency.
Simon Tillyer is a director of tenant referencing firm Vouch.
View Full Article: OPINION: Would periodic tenancies change everything for landlords?
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’