Nature, nurture and technology to boot!
I’ve spent many years dealing with end of tenancy disputes
and delivering training sessions on negotiation, early resolution and adjudication,
and what constitutes good evidence. So when I was invited to spend time at Life
Residential offices, exploring each stage of the lettings process and
understanding how it works right from the start, I jumped at the chance.
In our very technological world, we expect processes to flow
easily with a click of a button, often forgetting that some businesses are very
customer focused and not all tasks can, or should, be done by computer.
Aristotle once said “Nature
creates nothing without a purpose”.
While technology is not ‘nature’ I believe a good lettings
business recognises that its organic purpose is to provide a quality service to
its customers. This can only be done by communicating with ‘people’ at every
stage of the tenancy process in which ever way they prefer; be it by phone, in
person, as well as by text and email.
What I really noticed was the level of skills needed to deal
with customers in a professional and an appropriately informal way.
The front office teams’ ability to negotiate with a landlord
and prospective tenant, making sure they are a good match for the property; maybe
even at the initial call stage, discovering they’re unsuited to the property,
not yet in a position to rent a property or conversely, in a desperate hurry to
rent.
The apparently seamless negotiation and consultations when
taking a new instruction, visiting the property to measure up, which I was
fortunate to experience, and generating leads on property portals, re-letting a
property, as well as making sure all the legalities and check-in inspections are
in place when the tenancy starts, is definitely not as simple as it look, with
detailed checklists for every stage.
My experience included listening to phone calls with a
landlord who wanted to use his own tenancy agreement, and his refusal to
understand the potentially unfair clauses; a landlord who chose to do his own
cleaning at the end of the tenancy, but then did not, which left the agent in a
difficult position with the next tenant. I also went to a new property instruction
to measure up and that in itself is art form all on its own! Where to measure
from and what parts of the property to include, certainly more than just
whacking out the tape measure!
During the tenancy, landlords who choose the fully managed
service can be assured that their property is being looked after with mid-term property
inspections; which I was lucky to experience. These are so important for
spotting problems that may get worse if left till the tenancy ends, most
commonly damage as a result of a small leak or condensation left unattended.
At the end of the tenancy the property management team need
to be resilient with both landlords and tenants who need to agree on the
distribution of any deposit and settle any costs for cleaning or damage. The
ability to communicate with confidence and reach a compromise is a special
skill, with the aim of avoiding a formal dispute. The issues can be complex and
while most are standard, some will be more individual; take the tenant who said
he didn’t hear the bell and refuses to pay the aborted call out fee or the
damage only found under a carefully positioned desk after the check-out
inspection had been done.
Finally let’s not forget the accounts team who have to
reconcile their books after dealing with deposits, rent, dilapidations,
contractor payments, and in the case of fully managed properties, management
fees, service charges and ground rents. Knowing a client account from a revenue
accounts is a big responsibility and making sure landlords get their rent on
time is an essential part of the service. The consequences are unimaginable for
a customer who misses a mortgage payment just because the tenant is late
paying! All this before the onerous task of chasing late payments and rent
arrears!
So what did I learn?
That using an accredited and skilled agent who will manage your property is something to really consider. A professional agent with robust processes in place, a great team of people with the experience and training to stay calm in all situations, with skills to listen, ask relevant questions and negotiate.
As you can see from the number of technical competencies required, and laws and regulations to juggle, it is still surprising that in todays’ market today it is not compulsory for all agents to be qualified.
Landlords get what they pay for. A good agent is worth their
weight in gold and those paying the cheapest fees are often short changed. A
good management agreement will specify the services an agent promises to
deliver and if the fee they charge appears to be too good to be true then it
probably is.
Ultimately in todays’ world, no business can succeed without
technology but equally important to the success is the nature and nurture of
your customer. Property is a people business and landlords and tenants will
really value great service and staff who care, communicate and consider their
needs.
I’d like to say many thanks to the teams for taking the time
out and allowing me to shadow them. It was a great and enjoyable experience.
Suzy
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Nature, nurture and technology to boot! | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Nature, nurture and technology to boot!
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’