More than 4 tenants on a tenancy agreement?
Tenant Agreement:
The Law of Property Act 1925 talks about having a maximum of 4 tenants on an agreement. So what to do when you have 5, 6 or more tenants sharing a house?
There is a common misunderstanding of the rules here. Landlords and agents sometimes think or have heard that that the provisions in Section 34 (2) Law of Property Act 1925 – the four person rule – means that you can’t have an agreement with more than 4 people on it. That’s not true.
This article applies primarily to English law. Although tenancy laws are similar in other jurisdictions, there may be significant differences. Always seek professional advice before making or not making important decisions.
The 4 person rule only relates to the legal ownership of the property – the legal interest – in the property which a tenancy confers. The Act provides that for more than 4 tenants listed on the agreement, the first 4 will hold the property “on trust” for any number of remaining tenants. So, tenants 1 to 4 own the legal title to the property, and therefore will hold the beneficial interest on trust for tenants 5 and 6 or more.
Trusts operate in the same way; where a family trust is set up for children, the trustees will be the owners of the property, and perhaps also the investments they control for the beneficiaries – the children.
The 1925 Act says
“Where, after the commencement of this Act, land is expressed to be conveyed to any persons in undivided shares and those persons are of full age, the conveyance shall (notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Act) operate as if the land had been expressed to be conveyed to the grantees, or, if there are more than four grantees, to the four first named in the conveyance, as joint tenants [F1in trust for the persons interested in the land]”
Ownership of land, whether freehold or leasehold, has two parts in English law – legal ownership and beneficial ownership. The legal owner can be a different person from the beneficial owner. A tenant with a beneficial interest has a right to enjoy and use the property, benefiting from its possession. Therefore, with more than 4 tenants on the agreement, tenants 5 and 6 and more have as much right to enjoy the property as the primary (1 to 4) tenants.
Tenants 1 to 4 will hold the legal ownership of the tenancy on trust for themselves and tenants 5 and 6. This will be automatic, so no need to set it out in the tenancy agreement in any special way when listing all the tenants.
As with any tenancy agreement it is very important that all the tenants are named clearly on the agreement (named in full) and sign the agreement after reading it to show that they have all agree to comply fully with their contractual obligations, as set out in the agreement – they all have contractual liability.
Joint tenancy agreements provide for all tenants (including the beneficial owners listed) being jointly and severally liable for breaches of the agreement, including rent payments. So, if one of the tenants defaults on rent payments, the other tenants – or even just one tenant if the others cannot be traced – can become liable to pay.
You can source your Tenancy Agreements here
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – More than 4 tenants on a tenancy agreement? | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: More than 4 tenants on a tenancy agreement?
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’