LATEST: Investors battle PRS developer over plan to change Loan Note terms
Several investors in PRS residential developer The High Street Group who are part of a larger group owed an estimated £43 million are resisting an attempt by the company to suspend an early redemption clause within their Loan Note agreements.
The Newcastle-based firm is holding a special resolution meeting at its HQ on 1st June at which, it is expected, a decision will be made to remove the clause, which enables investors to be repaid within 30 days upon request.
A spokesperson for The High Street Group tells LandlordZONE: “The vote will continue on the planned timetable and we encourage all eligible parties to take part.
“Our investor proposal is a pragmatic, viable and responsible course of action to support the company’s successful corralling of resources to continue its investment programme.”
But some of the 2,000 investors who hold Loan Notes with The High Street Group – which is one of the largest PRS developers in the UK – say the company should instead be placed into administration and ultimately liquidation so that its assets, which include 15 sites worth some £100m, can be sold to pay off its creditors.
Patience is running thin among the group, LandlordZONE has been told, who are unhappy that if the vote goes through, they will have to wait until 2025 to find out if they will get their money back.
Difficult period
It’s been a difficult 12 months for The High Street Group. One of its subsidiaries has been wound up following a battle with a creditor, other companies within the group have struggled to post their accounts on time and auditor PwC recently resigned after revealing it was unable to access company information.
But the Loan Note holders, who say they fear the company could be making moves to protect its assets in case of a potential move to administration or liquidation, are divided on what to do. Some believe it should be given the extra time while others say ‘enough is enough’ and want their money back.
100% of investment
A spokesperson from The High Street Group, which developed the Hadrian’s Tower in Newcastle (main pic) adds: “Investors will receive 100% of their investment plus the agreed interest, but without the ability for early redemption.
“This measure is not unusual, in fact during the pandemic the FCA gave permission for investment firms to pause redemptions to maintain the viability of the sector.”
The company says its proposal have been met with strong levels of support with 50% of investors already agreeing to the new terms.
“New funding has been agreed for all our projects, which are now remobilising. The investor proposal is the final element of our fight back from the pandemic to take advantage of a newly emerging buoyant market,” the spokesperson adds.
Read more about the PRS developer sector.
Pic credit: The High Street Group.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – LATEST: Investors battle PRS developer over plan to change Loan Note terms | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: LATEST: Investors battle PRS developer over plan to change Loan Note terms
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,917)
Archives
- December 2024 (44)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords could pay tenants up to two years’ rent for failing Decent Homes Standard as PBSA is exempt
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025