LATEST: Formal pre-action protocol on the back burner ‘for the time being’
The government has confirmed to LandlordZONE that its much-discussed pre-action protocol for the evictions process has been shelved for the time being.
This follows last Friday’s announcement that it is instead introducing more basic pre-action rules for landlords that nevertheless must be met before a possession hearing can be continued or granted.
These come into force on 23rd August, the same day the eviction ban ends, and will apply to both existing action and new ones requiring landlords to:
- Provide a ‘reactivation notice’ informing the court and tenant in writing without which the case will remain dormant.
- Consider that if the action is about the non-payment of rent, the claim must set out what knowledge if any the landlord has as to the effect of the Coronavirus pandemic on the tenant and their dependants
- Produce the full arrears history in advance rather than at the hearing – this is encouraged rather than required.
The rules also suspend the standard period between issue of a claim form and hearing which would usually be not more than eight weeks.
Protocols ‘lite’
These pre-action rules are in effect a ‘lite’ version of a protocol, although the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) says that: “We remain interested in exploring the introduction of a pre-action protocol for private tenants in the future.
“New court rules – in place until end March 2021 – will require landlords to set out information about a tenant’s circumstances, including the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on a tenant’s vulnerability, when bringing a possession claim,” an MHCLG spokesperson says.
“Where this information is not provided, judges will have the ability to adjourn proceedings until such information is provided.
“This encourages landlords to have the right conversations with tenants before seeking repossession – helping to achieve the aims of a pre-action protocol. Through guidance, we are also encouraging landlords to agree to rent repayment plans or rent flexibilities where possible.”
Struggle
Paul Shamplina of Landlord Action says: “Using pre-action rules like this makes sense, but I really worry that landlords who have been waiting months from before Covid to evict tenants who haven’t been paying their rent, are going to struggle to re-engage and find out how Covid has affected their tenants.
“It is not practical and the chances of the tenant playing ball all pretty slim. So landlords are going to struggle to fulfil the pre-action rules and get their hearing.”
Read more about the eviction process rule changes.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – LATEST: Formal pre-action protocol on the back burner ‘for the time being’ | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: LATEST: Formal pre-action protocol on the back burner ‘for the time being’
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’