LATEST: Blow for commercial landlords as tenant wins court battle
International gym operator Virgin Active has won court appeal to have it’s recovery plan implemented against strong opposition from landlords, writes Tom Entwistle.
A London court has ruled in a commercial tenant’s favour allowing it to write off some of its rent arrears on the majority of its venues. Despite strong opposition from its creditors, Virgin Active will now avoid future steep rent payments.
The Virgin branded gym operator has welcomed the court’s decision for its controversial restructuring plan that the company says will save thousands of jobs across its international locations. It argued that had the action been lost, the company feared the business would have had to go into administration within days.
The gym business was launched in Britain in 1999 and has grown to 236 clubs in eight countries including Australia, South Africa, Italy and Botswana, with over one million members worldwide.
Severe blow
The ruling represents a severe blow for landlords as it is likely that more companies will now follow suit and seek a reduction in their debt using the same previously untried court process.
With many retailers, and especially those affected by the shut-downs, have seen their rent arrears and other debts building-up since March 2020 when the pandemic brought about closures for non-essential sales, gym operators being a prime example.
During the court hearings Virgin Active’s counsel argued that without the restructuring plan it was putting forward, the company would go into administration. This, it was argued, would be the worst of all outcomes for most classes of the gym company’s creditors.
In a statement the company had said: “Virgin Active is pleased that the court has supported its view that the restructuring plan represents a fair solution to the impact of the Covid crisis which has resulted in our clubs being closed for most of the last year.”
However, the landlord representatives had argued that the company could have tried other options, such as selling the business or selling off some venue assets, to address its debt problems.
Mr Justice Snowden, presiding, ruled that with Virgin Active’s restructuring plan “no member of a dissenting class will be any worse off than they would be in the relevant alternative.”
Meaning that this course of action was better that that entering into administration, throwing hundreds of employees out of work and selling off parts of the business.
Landlords are now worried by the ruling. They put up strong opposition to the new court processes which allow companies to restructure in this way as, are they argue, it “sets a dangerous precedent”.
Landlords say it allows wealthy backers to extract value in good times but claim insolvency when times are tough.
The Virgin Active group, which is 18% part-owned by Sir Richard Branson, has faced serious cash flow problems since the pandemic started as, like many similar non-essential leisure businesses they have had to close their doors for long periods.
Dangerous precedent
Speaking for the commercial landlords, the British Property Federation (BPF), the commercial real estate trade association’s chief executive Melanie Leech said: “This restructuring plan sets a dangerous precedent.
“The law is now allowing wealthy individuals and private equity backers to extract value from their businesses in good times but later claim insolvency, as simply a means to get out of their contractual obligations with property owners.
“This is fundamentally inequitable and the government should not allow it to continue.”
Under the new ruling landlords of commercial properties could be forced to write off millions of pounds in rent arrears at a time when many of them are struggling with their own financial problems.
Financial pain
The company’s landlords including Aberdeen Standard Investments and British Land say that they will now be left “shouldering a disproportionate part of the financial pain” from the Virgin Active plan.
Virgin Active sought to implement its refinancing plan under Part 26A of the Companies Act, meaning that creditor groups, such as its landlords, could in future be forced to accept a struggling tenant’s terms, even if they vote against the scheme.
Virgin Active’s new approach the it’s problems follows a string of controversial company voluntary arrangements over recent years as retailers faced declining business on the high street. These have been used by leading chains of retailers including Debenhams, Arcadia Group, New Look to name but a few.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – LATEST: Blow for commercial landlords as tenant wins court battle | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: LATEST: Blow for commercial landlords as tenant wins court battle
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,917)
Archives
- December 2024 (44)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords could pay tenants up to two years’ rent for failing Decent Homes Standard as PBSA is exempt
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025