Landlords need to plan for higher letting agents’ fees
Letting Fees Ban:
Buy-to-let landlords who use letting agents and those others that charge their own fees need to think seriously about how they will deal with the inevitably higher letting fees, or lost income, when the tenant fees ban comes in, most likely next year.
The extra costs involved will put a strain on some landlords, as the tax changes begin to bite and if interest rates start to rise as predicted.
It is almost inevitable that most agents will raise their landlord fees in order to recoup some of their lost income when the lettings fee for tenants ban comes in.
The government has carried out its own impact assessment of the fees ban and has estimated that landlords will lose around £83m in the first year of the ban, and the caps on damage and holding deposits have been estimated at £1.3m in total.
Letting agents themselves could be hit even harder with an estimated loss of income in the region of £157m in year one.
Tax and other regulatory changes in the private rented sector mean that landlords and agents are already facing significant challenges ahead.
Not all of these extra costs are likely to get passed on in the form of higher rents, as tenants themselves are under financial pressures. Landlords and agents need to find other ways to reduce their costs and increase efficiency.
Some landlords will consider more self-management of tenancies, but anyone taking this on for the first time must be prepared to do their homework, to mug-up on the law and to take on some extra work, especially when it comes to tenancy change-overs.
What is involved with a Fees Ban
The fees ban will apply to landlords as well as letting agents but only in England, at least initially. Scotland already has the ban.
The ban will not apply to existing tenancies, though it will apply to new tenancies and renewals which includes when a tenancy becomes periodic, after the Tenant Fees Act comes into force.
All fees required as a condition of the “grant, continuance or renewal� of an assured shorthold tenancy (AST) or licence agreement are to be banned. Company lets and non-assured tenancies will be exempt.
Examples of banned fees include:
- Admin fees
- Credit checks
- Referencing
- Inventories
- Guarantor checks
- Cleaning services
- Professional cleaning
- Gardening services
There are some exemptions:
- Rent
- Holding deposits, capped at one week’s rent and limited to 15 days
- Damage / Security deposits capped at 6 weeks’ rent
- Reasonable charges for defaulting, breach of tenancy, reminder letters, interest on arrears etc.
Varying the rent, for example setting a higher rent to cover fees for a period of time before reverting to a lower rent will not be allowed, thought rent level setting is unrestricted, so long as it is applied consistently.
Penalties for non-compliance will be a fine of up to £5000 for a first offence. Any subsequent breaches will be classed as criminal offences, or alternatively the landlord may be fined up to £30,000 and will be subject to a banning order.
These requirements may be subject to change once the Tenant Fees Act comes into force.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Landlords need to plan for higher letting agents’ fees | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Landlords need to plan for higher letting agents’ fees
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’