Landlords are calling for housing courts…
Evictions:
With the government’s commitment to abolishing the section
21 no-fault eviction process comes the necessity to improve the alternative
eviction process – section 8 and its existing 17 grounds for possession.
Whereas section 21 allows landlords to evict without giving
a reason, and often with no need to attend a court hearing, section 8 does not.
This is an adversarial system where the onus is on the landlord to prove, in
court, that the reason for their possession claim is a legitimate one which falls
within the scope of one of the 17 grounds.
It often results in a degree of contention and argument,
which invariably leads to excessive delay and expense.
Recently released official data shows that it is now taking even
longer than previously for landlords to repossess properties through the courts
– 17.3 weeks on average for a claim to result in a repossession. This is not
surprising given that county courts have been closing their doors and reducing
capacity right across the country.
The Government’s plans to scrap Section 21. This means that if landlords are not to be driven out of the rental market completely, some effective alternative to these long delays, and the minefield of section 8, has got to be found.
Housing Secretary James Brokenshire has promised to speed-up the eviction process through the courts, but what exactly does this mean? Will there ever be the resources to provide a really effective improvement to court processes? Anyone who has experienced the county court process could certainly be forgiven for being very sceptical about that.
Landlord groups are calling for a complete overhaul of the system, with the provision of specialist “housing courts�. This is something that has worked very well in Australia for many years, but again, does the Government have the commitment for this, and if it has, does the Ministry of Justice have the resources to implement it?
David Smith, policy director for the Residential Landlords
Association (RLA) has said the latest data on evictions shows that the courts
are unable to manage repossession claims within any timescale which landlords
would consider acceptable. And that’s before
section 21 is abolished. What are the prospects after it’s abolished?
He said: “The courts are simply unable to cope when
landlords seek to repossess property for legitimate reasons.
“The processes must first be fixed to ensure landlords are
not unduly frustrated when wanting to reclaim their property in the face of
tenants failing to pay their rents or committing anti-social behaviour.
“Before seeking to scrap Section 21 repossessions ministers
urgently need to give confidence to landlords and tenants that the courts will
first be substantially improved to speed up access to justice. That means
establishing a full and proper housing court.�
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Landlords are calling for housing courts… | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Landlords are calling for housing courts…
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,917)
Archives
- December 2024 (44)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords could pay tenants up to two years’ rent for failing Decent Homes Standard as PBSA is exempt
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025