Students claw-back rent from unlicensed landlord
Rent Refund:
Students from the
University of Leeds took their landlord to court and won back 12 months’ rent.
They won the rent refund because their landlord had failed to license the HMO –
House in Multiple Occupation.
Delighted postgraduate student Ben Leonard and his
co-tenants discovered that the landlord was letting the property illegally,
because it did not have a current HMO licence. It seems that their landlord did
apply to Leeds City Council for a licence, but only when the tenancy was
half-way through.
New HMO rules came into force effective 1 October 2018 on
mandatory HMO licensing. This means that mandatory licensing has now been
extended to cover most Houses in Multiple
Occupation (HMOs) occupied by five or more non-related people where there is
some sharing of facilities. The rules may vary slightly from authority to
authority but now affect properties with any number of stories, not just 3-storey
properties as before.
There are also new minimum bedroom sizes of 6.52 square
metres for one person, and 10.23 square metres for two people. The measurement
of these rooms cannot include areas where the ceiling is below 1.5 metres in
height.
Landlords must show that they are a “fit and proper person�
to be a landlord, that is free from any criminal record, and the property must
meet exacting safety standards, with regular safety inspections.
Landlords who don’t have a current HMO licence face fines of
up to £30,000, and they can be forced to repay up to 12 months of rent to their
tenants. This is done through what is known as a rent repayment order (RRO)
instigated by the tenants. This was the case with Mr Leonard’s landlord.
When Mr Leonard reported the matter to Leeds City Council,
the housing officer on the case informed him that the Council was taking court action
against the landlord and he explained that they (all the tenants) were entitled
to seek an RRO.
Having made their application, the tenants were obliged to
provide evidence of their rent payments using bank statements and their tenancy
agreement. To their delight, the evidence was accepted and the landlord was
taken to court. He pleaded guilty and, after all bills were deducted, including
an amount due to the landlord’s financial position, each tenant could reclaim around
£2,000.
Following publicity received after winning their case, Mr Leonard
told the BBC that he had received an “incredible� response on Twitter about the
case. He said he had been inundated with messages from other HMO tenants who thought
they may be in a similar position and that their landlords might have cases to
answer.
The “screw� is gradually being tightened on the rogue
landlord, which goes to emphasise the vital importance of following the rules when
letting residential property.
Rent
Repayment Order – Leeds City Council
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Students claw-back rent from unlicensed landlord | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Students claw-back rent from unlicensed landlord
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’