Is this what to expect when England’s housing court goes ahead?
As the government prepares to introduce a housing court, LandLordZone looks at the existing Scottish system to see what the future holds.
The government’s plans to
introduce a dedicated housing court in England will have huge implications for millions
of landlords who, if it takes inspiration from the Scottish system as expected,
will have to attend hearings in person to thrash out disputes and evictions.
Scotland’s government has
invested heavily in its Housing and Property Chamber tribunal system which
offers swift and transparent justice – decisions are often published the next
day highlighting poor behaviour by tenants and landlords alike.
And its most recent case,
published earlier today, is a case in point.
Deposit dispute
Tenant Romy King
took her landlord Lotta Brown to the tribunal after her £700 deposit was not lodged
correctly with an approved deposit protection provider, she had claimed.
King provided the judges
with email proof from all three schemes that they had not received proof of her
deposit’s protection within the 30-day window – or at all, in fact.
King had moved in during
September last year but, after experiencing difficulties with the property’s
heating, gave notice and the two parties then become embroiled in discussions over
a gas bill and when the rent for the notice period would be paid.
During this time, it became
clear that the deposit had not been lodged with a scheme, leaving it
unprotected for 12 days.
Brown accepted this but contested many of the details of when and how the discussions
between the two parties took place.
Although the Tribunal could
have fined Brown three times the monthly rent (£2,100), because of the
circumstances including the early departure of King from the property, this was
dropped to £50.
‘No excuse’
There should be no excuse
for landlords or their agents not protecting the tenant’s deposit as the
legislation has been around for a number of years now,” says David Gibb of
MyDeposits Scotland.
“The new Private Residential
Tenancy (PRT) agreement also details the requirement to place the deposit into
a scheme within 30 working days of the start date.
“If the PRT is being brought
to end prior to the 30 working days deadline, the landlord should return the
deposit in full to the tenant, or place into a scheme if they wish to make a
claim against the deposit.”
Eviction delays
Whilst these kinds of cases
are dealt with fairly swiftly by the FTT, landlord and agents in Scotland are
still concerned that eviction actions are taking too long.
A recent FOI request by agent
Aberdein Considine
confirmed the average time for an
eviction case is 141 days.
“As the landlord or agent is unable to raise the action until the tenant has been in rent arrears for three months, these time-frames can leave landlords facing a significant period without receiving rental income,” adds Gibb.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Is this what to expect when England’s housing court goes ahead? | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Is this what to expect when England’s housing court goes ahead?
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’