Incentivising landlords in the private rental sector
Housing Proposals:
A new report published by the University of Cambridge Centre for Housing & Planning, in partnership with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF), recognises the reluctance of many landlords to let their properties to low income tenants.
Given the apparent lack of support from government for small-scale private rented sector (PRS) landlords in this area, this report has produced three proposals which it claims could incentivise private landlords to let to social sector tenants, those claiming benefits.
Many benefit claiming tenants – singles and families – are having great difficulty securing rental accommodation in the private rented sector, and also in the social sector, given the decline of social sector housing.
The report claims that these proposals if implemented would improve accessibility, affordability, quality and security of housing for people in poverty in the PRS.
The proposals follow an international policy review of housing reform, and the contributing parties have identified key measures for further development in England:
(Proposal 1)
“The introduction of a Rental Incentive Allowance, enabling landlords to offset a proportion of their rental income against tax if they let their property to households in receipt of Local Housing Allowance. According to the report, this option would enable more people in poverty and with low incomes to access a larger range of more affordable private sector rented accommodation.”
(Proposal 2)
“Boosting incentives to improve the quality of property by allowing specified improvements to properties to be tax deductible against income tax, rather than Capital Gains Tax. This proposal could also incentivize landlords to take further action in improving the quality of accommodation on offer to low-income households, while also making improvements on measures such as energy efficiency, reducing fuel bills and other costs that would improve affordability.”
(Proposal 3)
“Improving access to housing by enabling local authorities to issue vouchers to priority households, guaranteeing the payment of rent. This measure could incentivise landlords to accept tenants viewed as a higher risk, making it easier for them to access accommodation.”
Cost Effective Measures?
The three proposals have been costed at: Proposal 1, £354 million a year; Proposal 2, £36 million in its first year, rising gradually to £86 million per year after nine years, and Proposal 3, £170 million per year.
By focusing on the use of taxation as a means of changing incentives for landlords in the PRS, the report claims the costs associated with the three proposals could be offset by HM Treasury’s recent tax increases implemented on private landlords.
The Government has anticipated an £808 million annual increase in tax revenues from landlords by 2021–22 through restricting mortgage finance interest relief to the basic rate of income tax.
The current Government is already in principle considering ways to incentivise landlords to offer longer tenancies.
Read the report here
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Incentivising landlords in the private rental sector | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Incentivising landlords in the private rental sector
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’