I am worried, seriously worried … and here’s why
Around 20% of the landlords who consult me regarding tax ask about the “Hybrid strategy” or the “LLP to Incorporation Strategy”.
The reason I am so worried is that these structures are scheming to abuse the tax system, and it is only a matter of time before HMRC react to that or HM Treasury influences new legislation to ensure they fall under GAAR legislation (General Anti Abuse rules) or insist they should have been registered under DOTAS (Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes). You may well have read about Film Partnerships and how some of those schemes abused the tax system. HMRC have powers to serve APN’s (Advance Payment Notices) on those who participate in such schemes, which call for the tax that would ordinarily have been paid to be paid immediately. It is then up to the individuals to prove the tax wasn’t due and to reclaim it. For many landlords, the consequences of that, given the amounts of money involved, could prove fatal to their businesses.
The Hybrid and the LLP to incorporation strategy “schemes” are being touted extensively by one particular company which visits all the landlord and property shows, and clearly has a very large marketing budget. The bottom line is that the promoters of these schemes are charging eye watering amounts of money to dress businesses up with a view to abusing the tax rules. In the examples I have written warning articles about, I have explained why the “schemes” are extremely high risk in my opinion. The problem is that the message isn’t being spread as and wide as it needs to be.
Please click on the articles below, read them and then share them with friends who might be considering these strategies. When you read my articles you will hopefully be as worried for your friends as I am about these schemes.
So how should tax planning work?
Let’s say for example that incorporation is your goal. The first consideration must be whether the transfer of properties from personal ownership to the company will trigger a CGT bill. If HMRC consider that you are running a business you will have the right to roll your capital gains into the shares in your new company. You don’t need a “scheme” to do that.
HMRC’s definition of a business is that: –
- Activities are a serious undertaking earnestly pursued
- Activity is a function pursued with reasonable or recognisable continuity
- Activity has a certain measure of substance in terms of turnover
- Activity is conducted in a regular manner and on sound and recognised business principles
- Activities are of a kind which, subject to differences in detail, are commonly made by those who seek to profit from them
Perceptions can prove to be important. Accordingly, we recommend that you have the following in place:-
- A business website
- Business stationery including letterhead and business cards
- A business email account
- A business telephone number
This is because you will need to convince HMRC that you are indeed running a business, as opposed to curating an investment portfolio which does not qualify for the relief.
The next consideration is Stamp duty. Again, you don’t need “schemes”. The law is very clear, if two or more people are running a business then a partnership exists under the Partnership Act 1890. You do not need to be an LLP or even to have registered a partnership with HMRC for the treatment of partnership rules to be applied to SDLT. Again, this is clear in HMRC’s internal manuals which we are always happy to share with our clients and their professional advisers.
The third consideration is the cost of refinancing. To avoid these costs, and if you prefer to retain the favourable mortgage terms you currently enjoy, we recommend the Beneficial Interest Company “BICT” strategy. This also has non-statutory clearance from HMRC, despite that fact that it’s purpose is to avoid refinancing costs as opposed to avoiding tax. The reason for this is that some client’s professional advisers, and even two National Newspapers, considered that some of the quirks within the structure were ambiguous in regards to tax legislation. We didn’t want to rely on a Barristers Opinion so we went direct to HMRC.
For absolute peace of mind, to ensure you qualify for the relief prior to incorporating, Property118 Limited recommends you to seek non-statutory clearance from HMRC on whether they consider you to be a business. This is the only area of ambiguity.
Property118 Limited has significant experience in helping landlords to draft their non-statutory clearance applications, our charges for which are £1,500 + VAT. We are so confident in our legal arguments in this regard that we provide a guarantee to refund fees if HMRC clearance is declined. We prepare all the paperwork and all you have to do is to sign and submit it. We have a 100% record of success.
We work very closely with Cotswold Barristers to deal with implementation, but we do not rely on Barristers’ opinions. It is the opinion of HMRC in regards to the legislation being relied upon which matters. Our guidance does not seek to abuse the tax system in any way.
Tax isn’t the only reason for incorporating either. There are many other considerations, some of which are positive and some of which are less so. One should never allow the tax tail to wag the dog!
Show Tax Consultation Booking Form
The post I am worried, seriously worried … and here’s why appeared first on Property118.
View Full Article: I am worried, seriously worried … and here’s why
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’