Gove promises to help release more leaseholders from cladding ‘nightmare’
The new housing secretary Michael Gove has promised to revisit the cladding scandal with a ‘fresh pair of eyes’ and see how thousands of leaseholders – including many landlords – can be helped out of the unending nightmare many find themselves in.
Gove (pictured) made the comments during a grilling by parliament’s housing select committee yesterday, in which he responded positively to criticism that his department’s actions to help marooned leaseholders appear to have stalled.
“The government has a responsibility to ensure buildings are safe but we also have a responsibility to relieve some of the obligations that are being faced by leaseholders at the moment, who are innocent parties in this and are being asked to pay disproportionate sums,” he told the select committee’s MPs.
In summary, he promised to:
- Publish up-to-date figures on the number of buildings with unsafe non-ACM cladding and the number of buildings under 18 metres tall that require remediation.
- Bring the developers and cladding suppliers to book who allowed unsafe cladding to be fitted to buildings in a way that was catastrophic and ‘manifestly illegal’. “There is an urgent need to ensure that justice is done,” he said. “There are individuals still in business who are guilty men and women.”
- Ensure his department issues fresh guidance for buildings under 18 metres originally covered by the controversial ESW1 form that will enable lenders to recommence lending on and remortgaging properties within them these towers ‘before Christmas’. Gove recognised that these types of buildings feature fire safety risks that are ‘less than feared’ and that action is needed to free up leaseholders and return the properties to the housing market.
- Clamp down on the organisations who are ‘profiteering’ from the cladding scandal, including some who are offering exorbitant ‘waking watch’ services to building leaseholders.
- Revisit the cladding costs that many leaseholders are being asked to pay even though it is evident they have no hope of being able to pay them. He told the MPs that he understood how leaseholders are seen at the ‘easy people to sting’ while builders, developers, freeholders and cladding suppliers were to hard to chase for the remediation costs – but said this approach is not acceptable.
Gove also said his department has yet to fully bolt down the difference between buildings with cladding that is ‘ultra-risky’ and those where the risk is negligible.
But he also said that suppliers and developers involved who claim they are ‘squeaky clean’ in the matter of building safety are ‘wrong’ and said he now wondered whether some had put cost reduction ahead of safety while others had manipulated cladding tests in order to ‘evade responsibility’.
Read one landlord’s account of being caught up in the cladding crisis.
Gove promised to update the committee on progress. Watch the full session.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Gove promises to help release more leaseholders from cladding ‘nightmare’ | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Gove promises to help release more leaseholders from cladding ‘nightmare’
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’