Covid year – 2020 – has resulted in a boom in buy-to-let businesses
The Covid pandemic did not dampen the enthusiasm for investing in buy-to-let properties, quite the contrary; according to figures released by Hamptons International, a leading estate agency, landlords created 41,700 buy-to-let firms last year. That represents a 23% increase over 2019.
Registering buy-to-let businesses through limited companies has grown considerably since the introduction of new regulations in the industry which changed the basis on which rental income is taxed for individual landlord, restricting a landlords’ ability to claim tax relief on mortgage interest payments.
The result has been a doubling of the number of buy-to-let rental companies since 2016, after the tax changes where introduced, preventing landlords from being able to claim relief on their mortgage interest payments, on a phased-in basis.
What some call a tax perk – though others have call it a right to interest relief, like on any other business loan – was reduced gradually and removed altogether in April.
However, if a buy-to-let business is operated under the umbrella of a limited company, landlord owners are still able to claim full tax relief on their mortgage interest payments – it’s the driving force behind the surge in the formation of these limited companies holding buy-to-let properties.
The table below shows how the tax changes impacted on a high-rate taxpaying landlord receiving £950 rent a month and paying £600 towards their mortgage, courtesy of consumer champion Which?
Mortgage tax relief for property with £950 rent and £600 mortgage per month | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tax year | Proportion of mortgage interest deductible under previous system | Proportion of mortgage interest qualifying for 20% tax credit under new system | Tax bill | Post-tax and mortgage rental income |
Prior to April 2017 | 100% | 0% | £1,680 | £2,520 |
2017-18 | 75% | 25% | £2,040 | £2,160 |
2018-19 | 50% | 50% | £2,400 | £1,800 |
2019-20 | 25% | 75% | £2,760 | £1,440 |
From April 2020 | 0% | 100% | £3,120 | £1,080 |
Three other spurs to the continued growth of investing in buy-to-let properties have been:
One, the intra-low interest rate environment where investors with cash are given few other opportunities to invest their money in alternatives which give anything near the modestly respectable, usually around 4 to 6%, return of a buy-to-let, at such low risk;
Secondly, the stamp duty holiday which currently, unless the Chancellor decides to extend the deadline, ends on the 31st of March, means that on properties worth up to £500,000 gives landlords a potential £15,000 when buying. They still need to pay the 3 per cent buy-to-let SDLT surcharge, but £15,000 is not to be sniffed at;
Three, the opening up of mortgage offers to the buy-to-let market of around 728 limited company mortgages for landlords, that’s according to the data provided by Moneyfacts. These offers are said to make up about a third of all buy-to-let deals.
There are still quite a few high street lenders that don’t offer these types of company mortgages for buy-to-let as they don’t think there’s enough demand, or because they cautiously demand personal guarantees from landlords for their company loans.
However, by December 2020 there existed a record 228,743 buy-to-let companies and Hamptons have estimated that around 50% of all buy-to-let purchases are put into a limited company, compared to just 20% in 2016.
Limited company mortgages do tend to cost more, on average around 3.71% for a two-year fixed deal, which compared to around 2.91% for an individual taking out a buy-to-let mortgage.
Because of the specialist nature of lending to buy-to-let companies, mortgage lenders in this field will be more expensive in their fees and rates and this may off-set some of the benefits of the tax savings. Some accountants even doubt the overall benefits of incorporation for small-scale buy-to-let landlords owning just one or perhaps two properties.
For individual landlords wishing to move existing investments into a buy-to-let company the economics of the change can be debatable as it in-effect means a sale and buy-back into the company, which triggers both capital gains and stamp duty liabilities. This of course depends on the circumstances involved, the amount of any gain and the size of the translations.
Within a company structure the income is subject to corporation tax, capital gains tax when properties are sold, and the landlord is subject to income tax when earnings are drawn out as dividends. Generally, if a company structure is beneficial, it is best set this up from the outset.
Anyone considering investing in this way should seek financial advice first.
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – Covid year – 2020 – has resulted in a boom in buy-to-let businesses | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: Covid year – 2020 – has resulted in a boom in buy-to-let businesses
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,862)
Archives
- November 2024 (53)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- NRLA blast Housing Minister’s court system remarks
- Why Do You Really Want to Invest in Property?
- Demand for accessible rental homes surges – LRG
- The landlord exodus is fuelling a rental crisis
- Landlords enjoy booming yields – Paragon