BREAKING: Government to foot £5 billion tower cladding remediation costs bill
Leaseholders in buildings over 18 metres or six storeys high are to have their remediation costs paid by the government where the freeholder or original contractor is unwilling or unable to do so.
The announcement was made by Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick (pictured) in a statement to parliament today, revealing that he was to make an ‘exceptional intervention’ on behalf of the government that leaseholders in high-rise towers will face no cost for remediation works.
But Jenrick said the decision to only cover towers over 18 metres was based on advice that the ‘overwhelming risk’ to life and limb came from dangerous cladding on these buildings, and that properties with cladding that are under 18 metres were unlikely to need remediation work and that the risks were ‘significantly lower’.
But towers and buildings of between four and six storeys high will not be covered by the new scheme, and property owners will instead receive long-term, low-interest loans to pay for work that will not exceed £50 a month cost – rather than grants.
New cash
Jenrick said the new cash, along with previous promises, brought the government’s total spend on the cladding scandal to £5 billion.
The housing minister said his decision was generous and fair to leaseholders but the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership (LKP) has labelled the decision, “a bitter disappointment for leaseholders everywhere”.
A spokesman adds: “It is shameful to treat leaseholders differently depending on an arbitrary factor like building height.
“Leaseholders in tens of thousands of buildings less than 18 metres have been told they will pay 100% of the costs of fixing others’ mistakes. Leaseholders in buildings above 18 metres may still face ruinous costs of fixing non-cladding defects.”
The announcement follows more than three years of uncertainty since the Grenfell Tower disaster that has left thousands of flats unsellable, unmortgageable and uninsurable due to flammable cladding.
Measures include a £3.4bn grant in addition to the existing £1.6bn building safety fund that leaseholders can apply to, which has been widely acknowledged as too small. Loans are expected to be offered for shorter buildings.
Sticking plaster
The LKP spokesman says the government’s solution is a sticking plaster that doesn’t cover all of the related fire safety defects, such as flammable insulation and missing fire breaks.
He adds: “The real culprits, the developers, are being let off paying anything. They get to keep all £30 billion they stand to gain from the taxpayer under the Help To Buy scheme.”
Around 274,000 flats are estimated to have dangerous cladding, according to the Association of Residential Managing Agents, although that figure is likely to reach into the millions when those living in lower rise structures where problems have also emerged are taken into account.
The extra government spend is to be funded partly through a tax on home builders, who will have to pay an additional levy when developing high-rise towers in the future, Jenrick has revealed, and an additional general tax on all large property developers kicking off next year.
Cladding scandal
Paul Afshar, campaigner for End Our Cladding Scandal (pictured): “The Government promised us no leaseholder would have to pay to make their homes safe. Today we feel betrayed. We were hoping for a solution to stop the sleepless nights and for millions living in buildings less than 18m there has been none. Robert Jenrick needs to get a grip on the cladding crisis.
“Loans longer than mortgage terms for millions and not even enough to cover the cost of making the buildings that the government consider most high risk safe. Taxpayers and leaseholders are left to foot the bill for billions of pounds while the largest developers – who have made over £10 billion in profit since the Grenfell fire – are let off lightly.
“Many people living in buildings under 18m will still have to bear the cost – for many above £30,000 – saddled with debt around their necks for thirty years.
Where is the money for missing fire breaks, alarms or for cladding on buildings under 18m? Leaseholders are the victims of this crisis and have done nothing wrong to deserve this.”
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – BREAKING: Government to foot £5 billion tower cladding remediation costs bill | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: BREAKING: Government to foot £5 billion tower cladding remediation costs bill
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’