As buy-to-let criteria tighten, what are the options for smaller landlords?
Lenders are ramping up their affordability calculations in anticipation of changes to landlord tax relief. Where will this leave cash-poor landlords in low yield areas?
This week, Newcastle Building Society became the latest lender to impose stricter affordability criteria for buy-to-let borrowers.
The lender follows in the footsteps of Nationwide’s specialist subsidiary The Mortgage Works (TMW), which on 11 May increased its rental cover threshold to 145%. It also cut its maximum loan-to-value (LTV) ratio from 80% to 75%. In the days since, Barclays, Foundation Home Loans and Keystone have all announced similar policy shifts.
A response to market conditions
These decisions are not out of the blue. In April 2017, the government will begin phasing out tax relief on buy-to-let mortgage interest. By the 2020–21 tax year, mortgaged landlords in higher tax bands will pay more income tax than they do now. The measures will also affect some basic rate taxpayers.
The changes taking place now will help lenders ensure that clients have adequate income to meet growing overheads. They also limit the amount that a client can borrow, particularly in more expensive areas. As costlier properties tend to generate lower rental yields, landlords will need to put up more equity to qualify for a mortgage.
This has led to worries that cash-poor landlords in areas like London and the South East will struggle. Some have commented that buy to let will become a “rich person’s game”.
Criteria improving elsewhere
The idea that TMW’s criteria would create a ‘domino effect’ has proven to have some mileage. But in other areas, lenders have become more flexible.
One big change we’re seeing is pay rate stress tests. Lenders often calculate rental cover at a notional interest rate. 5.0% is common, and the typical figure is rising as part of broader criteria changes.
But for longer-term fixed rates or loans under a certain loan-to-value (LTV) threshold, many lenders apply lower stress rates. Some even permit calculations at the product pay rate. Popular ‘lifetime’ tracker loans are often calculated at the pay rate, as there is no reverting rate.
Reducing a 5.5% stress rate by 50 basis points to 5.0% allows as much as 10% more borrowing. Depending on the area, this can mean thousands or even tens of thousands of pounds.
Treatment of limited companies
Landlords who invest through limited company structures pay corporation tax rather than income tax. Thus, the new tax relief laws will not affect them. Lenders recognise this, and what used to be a niche product has become more prominent.
In the last three months alone, the number of limited company products on Commercial Trust’s sourcing system has grown by one fifth. The average rate has fallen from 4.64% to 4.39%. And despite the wider climate of falling interest rates, the rate differential between limited company products and ordinary products has shrunk by 15 basis points.
Some lenders have exempted limited companies from their tougher criteria. Notably, Foundation Home Loans is keeping its rental cover ratio at 125% for limited company applicants.
We have also seen a few lenders eliminate the price differential altogether, pricing their limited company deals the same as their standard ranges.
Options for smaller landlords
According to the Residential Landlords Association (RLA), 84% of landlords have considered raising rents to offset rising costs.
But in areas where rents already account for two thirds of average income, this is not practical. Tenants’ finances are as large a factor in determining rent levels as supply and demand. Pushing rents too high could lead to arrears, expensive evictions or void periods. (Many landlords prefer to keep rents level to retain good tenants and avoid the costs of filling an empty property.)
Many landlords are considering setting up limited companies to limit their tax costs. Whilst potentially a beneficial arrangement, this approach is complex, and requires professional tax advice.
A less drastic measure, and one all landlords should consider, is a portfolio review. It may be possible to increase equity in more highly-geared areas through property improvements, overpayments or switching to a part or full repayment mortgage. (Though be aware of early repayment charges (ERCs) if considering either of the latter two options.)
The investment climate of the property sector has never been immutable. There are always changes, and though there may be setbacks in the short term, forward-thinking investors have always adapted and found new ways to prosper.
Just be sure to consider all your options and speak to the appropriate professionals to help determine the best route forward.
Written by Ben Gosling at Commercial Trust Ltd
… LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: As buy-to-let criteria tighten, what are the options for smaller landlords?
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,840)
Archives
- November 2024 (31)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Bought a property at auction without details of existing tenant?
- Buying a property at auction with a sitting tenant?
- Government’s second homes policy doesn’t address the housing crisis
- Council inspects 500 PRS homes – and finds 2,000 issues
- Labour urged to bring in secret inspections of rented properties