ANALYSIS: Councils continuing to invest in risky commercial property
Some councils are continuing to invest in commercial property to boost their day-to-day income, despite warnings that these investments are risky.
One recent example is Somerset’s four district councils investing over £200 million between them in commercial property, in order to fund front-line services.
The trend has been in train for some time now as ultra-low interest rates have enabled councils to borrow to buy these investments very cheaply.
Consequently, local authorities across the UK have been buying-up income producing commercial property, planning to use the rental income to make up for reduced grant funding from central government.
The problem for many of these investments has been that Covid 19 has had a dramatic effect on this rental income, in some cases reducing it to zero as major retail chains have gone into administration.
Empty stores
There are examples of councils investing millions into large department stores that now lie empty, and far from producing an impressive income stream, they have now become a liability, with business rates, insurance and security costs all falling on the owner – the council and in turn, the local taxpayers.
In the Somerset case, the four councils have invested taxpayers’ money into a range of investments, ranging from offices and warehouses to housing projects and business parks.
Granted not all of these investments have or will turn sour, but nevertheless the councils have been warned by property professionals that they are entering an unfamiliar field, where even with the best skill, judgement and expertise, things can easily go wrong. These investments in commercial property, especially in the current business environment, are highly ‘risky’.
Below forecasts
The Taxpayers’ Alliance (TA) has been warning for some time that some of these investments in commercial property are delivering yields which are well below forecasts.
The latest analysis by the taxpayers’ campaigning group reveals a ‘mixed picture’ for investments made by councils across the UK, even before the pandemic.
The group’s study found that Leeds, Shropshire, Buckinghamshire, Surrey, Runnymede and Woking councils all reported that rental income was well below what they expected when the investments were made.
According to the TA, Spelthorne council was the only local authority it selected that reported all investments were returning income in line with forecasts.
Harry Fone, campaign manager at the TaxPayers’ Alliance, has said: “While it can see some success, including keeping council tax down, there are no guarantees with any investment and ultimately it’s ratepayers that will end up footing the bill for underperforming portfolios.”
Cllr Richard Watts, chair of the Local Government Association’s Resources Board, in response to the TA’s comments, has said: “When making investments, councils need to follow strict rules and assessments to ensure they invest wisely and manage the risk of their investments appropriately. Investments are not only made to try and plug funding shortfalls but also to help contribute to local economies.
“Councils continue to face significant extra cost pressures and huge income losses as a result of the pandemic. The Government’s commitment to fund a portion of lost income from fees and charges is a step in the right direction but does not cover full losses, nor does it extend to commercial income losses.”
It has been reported that in the Somerset case, between the four councils in the county, £202,427,000 has been invested in commercial property, to date. South West Taunton (SWT) Council in particular has intimated that it could invest significantly more in property over the coming 12 months, potentially outstripping each of its three neighbours.
Not all of these investments reside in the local area. Here’s a rundown of the council’s current investments provided by Wellington Weekly News:
- Wickes Extra, Birmingham – £9.81m
- Aztec West Business Park, Bristol (unspecified number of units) – £9.1m
- B&Q store, Ayr – £6.6m
- The Range, Halifax – £5.445m
- Mecca Bingo, Corporation Street, Taunton – £1.614m
- Roughmoor Enterprise Centre, Roughmoor Lane, Williton – £1.405m
- Blackdown Business Park, Scott’s Lane, Wellington (four units) – £1.308m
- The Arcade (formerly The Carousel or K’s), Warren Road, Minehead – £314,000
- Other investments (under £250,000 in value) – £1.577m
Martin Henwood, SWT Council’s corporate finance adviser has said: “We invest in a diverse investment property portfolio, both locally and nationally, with the intention of generating surplus income that will be spent on local public services delivered within the district.
“This is an essential response to significant reductions in government funding over recent years and further reductions expected in future, in order to meet our service delivery objectives and avoid service cuts.
“We plan to increase our investment by up to £100m by the end of 2021/22,” he confirmed.
Pic credit: Stephen Oldham | Flickr
©1999 – Present | Parkmatic Publications Ltd. All rights reserved | LandlordZONE® – ANALYSIS: Councils continuing to invest in risky commercial property | LandlordZONE.
View Full Article: ANALYSIS: Councils continuing to invest in risky commercial property
Post comment
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,916)
Archives
- December 2024 (43)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction
- How to Avoid SDLT Hikes In 2025
- Shelter Scotland slams council for stripping homeless households of ‘human rights’