How Technology is Reshaping Property Management
Managing BTL properties can sometimes be a complex and challenging task whether you’re managing a small portfolio of 3 properties or 15. Keeping track of your tenants, utilities, recurring payments, and cash flow can be overwhelming.
Fortunately, property management technology is available these days to make this task more manageable.
View Full Article: How Technology is Reshaping Property Management
Flat sales help propel the market back to pre-pandemic levels
The popularity of buyers investing in flats is helping to propel the housing market back to its pre-pandemic level for the first time since September, research reveals.
And, according to Rightmove, sales are now just 1% behind March 2019.
View Full Article: Flat sales help propel the market back to pre-pandemic levels
PLANNING: Landlords battle city council over its ‘anti-HMO campaign’
Landlords locked in a battle with Porsmouth council over its approach to shared houses have branded its recent planning decisions an ‘anti-HMO campaign’.
Trouble has been brewing the city since councillors on its planning committee began overriding the council’s own planning advice and rejecting HMO or HMO extension applications.
This came to a head recently when landlord Anthony Lane successfully appealed their rejection of his application, which has cost him £40,000 so far to pursue, despite a planning officer recommending it be approved.
Local paper The News reports that the committee told lane the property would “fail to provide a good standard of living accommodation for the occupiers and represent an over-intensive use of the site”.
Criticised
But a planning inspector, who has overturned the committee’s decision, also criticised councillors for having a “disturbing lack of awareness of basic planning procedure and law’ and that the council ‘behaved unreasonably across several fronts”.
The council, which may have to reimburse Lane for this legal expenses, also faces further costs if other HMO planning application decisions are called in, it has been warned.
But the committee has doubled down, calling for new planning laws to be drawn up through its new local plan that would ban any increase in the size of an HMO with more than six bedrooms and a reduction in the proportion of shared homes allowed in the city from 10 per cent to five per cent.
Alwin Oliver (main picture), vice-chairman of the Portsmouth and District Private Landlords’ Association, believes the council has embarked on an anti-HMO campaign.
“HMOs are absolutely vital for housing students and workers in the city,” Oliver told The News. “Ironically many of the people who rely on them are employees of the city council”.
“Yet the committee is intent on squeezing smaller ones out of the city through licensing and some of the strictest planning requirements of anywhere in the county. They treat tenants and landlords like second class citizens.”
Pic credit: Josh Wright/JDPI media
View Full Article: PLANNING: Landlords battle city council over its ‘anti-HMO campaign’
EXPERT: Why are so many agents and landlords ignoring fees law?
The Tenant Fees Act has been in place for nearly four years but is it shocking how many property professionals, also known as letting agents, are either not aware of its existence, or believe they can charge a fee as long as they call it something else.
I have looked at the 34 most recent cases heard by First Tier Tribunals relating to Tenant Fees Act and any financial penalties awarded.
Shockingly of these cases only ten were brought against landlords who were self-managing, the rest were all against letting agents, a number of which where high street national agents which, in my opinion should have known better.
The most common complaints raised by tenants were:
- Refusing to refund holding deposits 58.8%
- Early termination fees 14.7%
- Security deposit over 5 weeks 8.8%
For this last category all three were brought against self-managing landlords.
And in all but four of these cases, the Tribunal found in favour of the tenant and ordered the agent/landlord to refund them in part or full.
The tribunal awarded the return of over £11,500 of prohibited fees to tenants or £385 per case on average.
More worryingly many of the agents who defended their cases claimed the holding deposit was ‘a reservation cost’ or ‘advanced rent’.
It’s clear that several well-known agencies have recently tried to disguise a prohibited fee by claiming that an Assured Shorthold Tenancy has not been created and therefore the Tenant Fees Act doesn’t apply.
What is seriously concerning is the fact that landlords who are clearly taking heed of ‘unconscious incompetence’ and putting their trust in letting agents to manage their asset within the law are being let down at the very first (and can I say) rather basic hurdle.
If property professionals aren’t aware of the regulations how can the negative reputation surrounding the private rented sector ever improve?
Here’s my guide for both landlords and agents
What is a holding deposit?
A holding deposit is a payment made to a landlord or letting agent to reserve a property.
The holding deposit cannot be more than 1 weeks’ worth of rent and the property must be removed from the market.
Since the introduction of the Tenant Fees Act there are now have some strict rules that need to be followed when taking a holding deposit.
I will just point out that a holding deposit is not a legal requirement and doesn’t have to be taken, but if one is taken then the following must be done correctly.
Only one holding deposit can be taken for a property
It is not uncommon for some landlords and agents to take more than one holding deposit and then simply refund those who don’t pass referencing or fail to refund anyone in one of the cases at the Tribunal.
Receipt and Holding Deposit information
When a holding deposit it taken, it is a legal requirement to provide the tenant with a receipt for the funds as well as a document that sets out what the holding deposit it for, how long it will be held and the clear reasons for refund and for withholding it.
Failure to provide this to the applicant could mean you are subject to a find or having to refund the monies.
Provide a copy of the tenancy agreement
A draft copy of the tenancy agreement must also be given to the applicant when the holding deposit is take, this document can have water marks to show it is a draft, but it must contain the terms of the tenancy that the tenant will be expected to enter into
14 days to enter into a tenancy
Under the Tenant Fees Act, you have 14 days to enter into a tenancy agreement from the date the holding deposit is paid, if this is not possible, may be due to referencing not coming back in time, then the agent or landlord would need to sign and agreement to extent the time. If this is not done then the holding deposit must be returned in full on day 15.
When can a holding deposit be withheld?
Failed referencing
It is not uncommon for applicants to fail referencing, but this is not automatically a reason to withhold the holding deposit.
Only if applicants have provided false or misleading information that would have made you move forward with he let would give you reason to possibly withhold if they failed referencing.
Not entering into a tenancy
If the tenant fails to take reasonable steps to enter into the tenancy, then the agent or landlord could retain the holding deposit, but if it is the agent or landlord who is dragging their feet then the holding deposit should be returned if the tenant pulls out of the let.
If either party changes their mind
If the applicant changes their mind before the let is agreed, then the landlord or agent can usually retain the holding deposit, as long as the agent or landlord have not done something to force the tenant to change their mind.
Also, if the landlord changes their mind, then the holding deposit would need to be refunded as long as the reason for the change was not a deliberate act to mislead by the applicant.
Author bio
Julie Ford is a Property Redress Scheme (PRS) Tenancy Mediator with over 25 years’ experience of working in the private rented sector
View Full Article: EXPERT: Why are so many agents and landlords ignoring fees law?
Registration and planning consent needed for holiday lets
A consultation has been launched by the government to protect the UK’s ‘cherished towns’ that will see holiday homeowners being forced to get planning permission for letting their property and if it is in England, it will need to be registered.
View Full Article: Registration and planning consent needed for holiday lets
Landlords and agents in London see a big rise in licensing fines
London’s councils look set to double the amount in fines they collected from landlords and agents last year under selective or additional licensing schemes, one company is reporting.
Geospatial tech firm Kamma says that in the last three months
View Full Article: Landlords and agents in London see a big rise in licensing fines
BREAKING: Government moves to restrict Airbnb lets in holiday hotspots
The Government has revealed plans to force those seeking to convert homes in short-let properties within England’s holiday hotspots to seek planning permission first.
Such powers for local authorities are to be consulted on by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities prior to any legislation.
The aim of the initiative is to ‘help support local people in areas where high numbers of holiday lets are preventing them from finding affordable housing’.
Exemptions to the rules are also being proposed to enable those who let out their homes to make money from their properties for up to a specified number of nights in a calendar year without the need for planning permission.
The Government says it wants to ensure the country “reaps the benefits of diverse and sustainable accommodation and support the visitor economy, while also protecting local communities and ensuring the availability of affordable housing to rent or buy”.
Benefits
Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing and Communities, Michael Gove adds: “Tourism brings many benefits to our economy but in too many communities we have seen local people pushed out of cherished towns, cities and villages by huge numbers of short-term lets.
“I’m determined that we ensure that more people have access to local homes at affordable prices, and that we prioritise families desperate to rent or buy a home of their own close to where they work.
“I have listened to representations from MPs in tourist hot spots and am pleased to launch this consultation to introduce a requirement for planning permissions for short term lets.”
The new proposals within the consultation come as the Department for Culture Media and Sport also launches a separate consultation on a new registration scheme for short-term lets, which is due to be introduced through the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill, which is currently going through Parliament.
Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer adds: “This new world of ultra-flexible short term lets gives tourists more choice than ever before, but it should not come at the expense of local people being able to own their own home and stay local.”
Speaking on the BBC’s Today radio programme, Malcom Bell, Chair of Visit Cornwall. “In principle, [these planning rules are] a good idea but we need the public register first…it’s something that we’ve been lobbying for over the past five years.
“We need to get the balance right between the economic benefit of short-term lets and losing community vibrancy.”
Read more about short lets.
View Full Article: BREAKING: Government moves to restrict Airbnb lets in holiday hotspots
Property Investors Awards 2023 Nominations Now Open
We are delighted to announce that nominations for the 2023 Property Investors Awards are officially open. This year there are 20 different award categories to nominate for, which is more than ever before.
We invite you to take this opportunity to submit your nominations and have the opportunity to be nationally recognised for your property investment successes.
View Full Article: Property Investors Awards 2023 Nominations Now Open
Sellers under pressure after 11 months of falling demand
Homebuyer demand has now been down for 11 consecutive months – with new properties and agreed sales also taking a downturn, RICS reports.
The cautious market is still seeing house prices fall with agents predicting this trend will continue for the next 12 months.
View Full Article: Sellers under pressure after 11 months of falling demand
OPINION: Yet another property training company bites the dust!
I have lost track of the number of firms offering property investment courses and investment vehicles that have gone bust in my own experience, some offering dodgy training courses or imaginative investment schemes of one sort or another, and right down to those plying outright scams.
Asset Academy Limited was a property training organisation linked to well known TV personality and “Homes Under the Hammer” presenter, Martin Roberts.
The firm, which was fronted by Roberts as their “Brand Ambassador” went to the wall recently owing creditors over £3million.
Quite how a training organisation, with little in the way of overhead should owe so much money beggars belief?
Nevertheless, the company went into administration according to Company’s House records owing that enormous sum. Roberts, through a complicated web of listed companies, and his wife Kirsty, were directors of the failed company, though they claim to have had little involvement in its running.
According to newspaper reports the company has laid off all its staff. It has left in its wake a trail complaints from would-be property investors who claim to have been cheated out of thousands of pounds in cash payments. Many claim to have been chasing the company for refunds, but sadly, now, there is little chance of them getting anything back.
Anyone with an interest in property will be familiar with the BBC celebrity Martin Roberts who hosts the popular and seemingly ubiquitous “Homes under the Hammer”, a programme which has had a very successful formula and proves to be an informative and interesting programme.
Robert’s involvement in this venture however, it would seem, has been an unfortunate segue which threatens to tarnish reputations.
Personal experience
Many years ago now, after having received several flyers through the mail about a “Martin Roberts” training event, I decided to go along to one, at a Manchester venue near me, to find out what this was all about. I suppose curiosity got the better of me and the prospect of listening to a TV celebrity first hand got the better of me.
However, this was not to be! I turned up at the event, joined the small audience and to my surprise, no Martin Roberts? Maybe he would be on later after the speaker who was confronting us. But no, I was to be disappointed.
Instead we were all assailed by this presenter (not a very slick one either) who was telling us how he had become a multi-millionaire property tycoon, and how we could be one too. What’s more, we wouldn’t need to put any money down to do it?
I’ve been in property for over 45 years and involved in property events for over 20, so you can imagine, I was approaching this with my cynical hat on – I had seen it all before. The presenter proceeded to explain to this quite obviously naive and inexperienced crowd that the starting point to their property investing career, their road to virtually instant riches, would be to apply for as many credit cards as possible, go away and sign up for a dozen, that would be good.
You’ve got to remember this was when property was booming and money was cheap, banks were falling over themselves to lend and people were being made redundant. I imagine that for some in the audience, it was their last roll of the dice. So, in a nutshell, the strategy was to accumulate these credit cards and max them out, to get yourself a run-down property at auction, renovate it, then mortgage it and take out a chunk of cash, before moving on to the next deal.
Well, I had no doubt that this strategy could be applied successfully by about 1 percent of the population, but certainly not by this inexperienced and seemingly desperate bunch of would-be property tycoons I was sat among. In fact, it would have frightened me to death to attempt such a risky feat!
During questions, asked of us by the presenter, my reply went down like a lead balloon. It certainly deflated his sales patter balloon, and he made it plain I wasn’t welcome. The point was I felt sorry that he was misleading people.
They come and they go…
Over these many years in property, and doing the property event circuit, I’ve seen so many of these so call property “trainers”, property “experts”, property “gurus” (guru used as it’s easier to spell than charlatan) and downright scams artists, so many in fact that I’ve lost count.
It’s hard to believe how easily they take people in with their slick brochures, presentations, websites and taster days. They take people for thousands of pounds in fees for, in the main, information that’s readily available for free. Select a decent book on Amazon, written by a bona fide property expert, with some real world experience, and you will learn more.
But people like to be led, they like reassurance and they like to be told what they want to hear. They’re often sold a dream which turns into a nightmare!
Yes, it’s certainly possible to make a lot of money in property given the right approach, but not overnight and certainly not stress free with “no money down.” There are some legitimate property educators who do a good job, without charging excessive amounts of money, but you need to do some research to find them – see below.
Research, research and research…
All property investment should start off with a good deal of research, whether that’s finding a good location and a good property to invest in, sourcing finance, finding the right book or indeed finding some help through an educator.
You don’t need to look very far with a company like Asset Academy Limited to realise its risky to invest in its training – its TrustPilot entries – https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/assetacademy.co.uk are crammed full of very negative one-star reviews, peppered with a series of 5 star reviews which tip it’s overall score, but which seem decidedly overly-glowing to me?
Martin Roberts has been described in the press as an “advanced speaker” for the firm, offering to share his knowledge of buying at auction, though when I check the Asset Academy website today, still live – https://www.assetacademyonline.com – all reference to Martin Roberts seems to have been removed.
My colleagues at LandlordZONE have written recently about the dangers of property courses offering quick routes to success and how to avoid them if you want to get help with your property investing education from reliable sources.
I would endorse this approach and suggest you follow their advice:
Investors looking for trustworthy and ethical operators should turn to the PEAS or Property Educators Accreditation Scheme.
Launched in 2021 and backed by LandlordZONE, its founder Cyril Thomas said at the time:
“PEAS will help future students looking for a property educator to discover ‘the good guys’ who have signed up to be ethical and transparent, and that it will strike a balance between cooperation and enforcement”.
View Full Article: OPINION: Yet another property training company bites the dust!
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,918)
Archives
- December 2024 (45)
- November 2024 (64)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Why choose The Home Insurer for landlord insurance?
- Landlords could pay tenants up to two years’ rent for failing Decent Homes Standard as PBSA is exempt
- Landlords’ Rights Bill: Let’s tell the government what we want
- 2025 will be crucial for leasehold reform as secondary legislation takes shape
- Reeves inflationary budget puts mockers on Bank Base Rate reduction