TV probe uncovers PRS platform’s misleading claims within £470k funding pitch
A student lettings platform has been exposed for misleading investors while raising £470,000 in a crowdfunding pitch by boasting it would become the ‘Uber of student rentals’.
Edinburgh-based Student Rents, run by father and son team Grant MacCusker and Jamie Stewart, secured funding from 179 investors, and claimed three other highly experienced people were part of their team, according to an investigation by STV News.
However, photographs of chief product and technology officer Phillip Scott, who was listed as having previously worked for Ebay and Shopify, chief operating officer Kirsty Wilson, and Nicola Wood were found to be stock images. Ebay and Shopify confirmed nobody called Phillip Scott had ever worked there.
Until last Friday, MacCusker was registered as a director of both Lettinglord, the legal name of Student Rents, and Letting Cloud, but his appointment has now ended, according to Companies House.
The pair also fabricated a buyout of Letting Cloud by Airbnb, according to STV.
5,000 agents
The firm claimed it had more than 5,000 agents advertising more than 500,000 properties. But Airbnb denied any relationship or acquisition of Letting Cloud, and told STV News the claims were “fabricated”. When asked, Letting Cloud said the matter was in the hands of its lawyers.
CrowdCube told STV News: “We are aware of the reported allegations and are conducting an investigation. At this stage, we cannot provide further comment.”
The news channel contacted Students Rents and Letting Cloud which did not deny the claims made in its article. A spokesperson for Student Rents said: “We are actively working with Crowdcube to resolve any issues and reporting on this issue doesn’t help either party at this moment in time.”
LandlordZONE has tried to contact Student Rents.
View Full Article: TV probe uncovers PRS platform’s misleading claims within £470k funding pitch
Property investor hit with £16,000 rent repayment order after licencing failure
The director of a property investment and management firm has been stung with a £15,900 rent repayment order after failing to convince a First Tier Property Tribunal that he didn’t know about HMO licensing.
John Campbell, the boss of Hackney 4 Ltd, claimed he was unaware his three-bedroom flat in Cazenove Road (main picture), London, was covered by Hackney’s additional licensing and selective licensing schemes.
He had owned the property since 2007 but hadn’t seen any local publicity, or reference to it on internet landlord forums and received no notification from the council or from the superior landlord.
The four tenants – who shared the pay-out, along with £600 costs – pointed out that blaming his ignorance was disingenuous due to his position in the property company.
However, Campbell argued this was based upon his knowledge of property investment and management which did not include a technical expertise in legislation regulating the PRS.
Reasonable
The tribunal ruled: “The licensing scheme has been in place since 2018 in Hackney. It may have been objectively reasonable for the respondent to be ignorant of the requirement for the first six or nine months of its implementation. It is not objectively reasonable to be ignorant of the requirements for a period of one or more years.”
It had serious concerns about the landlord’s conduct in relation to standards in the property where he had delegated several management responsibilities to the tenants.
The Tribunal also pointed to persistent damp and the presence of mould, his failure to replace an ageing boiler which kept breaking down, and the fact there was no communal space other than the kitchen.
It added: “It seems unlikely to the tribunal that the property will be licenced for four separate households once it is inspected by London Borough of Hackney.”
Read the judgement in full.
View Full Article: Property investor hit with £16,000 rent repayment order after licencing failure
20 years supporting property investors
At the Property Investor Show at Excel last Friday, I was delighted to be presented with an award for being one of the longest-standing exhibitors at the show since 2003 and having provided support to other property investors for 20 years through our property investors network (pin) monthly networking meetings all over the UK.
View Full Article: 20 years supporting property investors
Landlord given suspended prison sentence after appalling illegal eviction
A landlord has been handed a suspended jail sentence for kicking out his tenant during a national eviction ban.
Amjad Ali Khattak removed the woman’s possessions in December 2020 and left them on the street in the rain (pictured), which was witnessed by a police officer.
Khattak admitted the offence and was sentenced to nine months in prison, suspended for two years, and ordered to pay prosecution costs of £15,000.
Oxford Crown Court heard that the landlord, who owns the ground floor flat on Gatteridge Street (main pic), Banbury, failed to allow a Cherwell District Council environmental health officer to inspect the electrics but entered without the tenant’s permission to check the fuse board.
The tenant was forced to use old £1 coins to feed a meter and had suffered an electric shock using white goods in the kitchen.
Reference checks
The court heard that the tenant’s deposit had not been placed in a protection scheme, while Khattak had not carried out right to rent, or reference checks.
Her tenancy agreement was removed from among her personal belongings, while her cat disappeared during the eviction and has not been seen since.
Nicola Riley (pictured), the council’s assistant director for wellbeing and housing, says it advised Khattak that it would be illegal to evict his tenant; he not only ignored this warning, but also went on to disregard requests from the council and the police to allow her to re-enter her home.
“At the time of the offence, the tenant did owe a small amount of rent, but she had clearly communicated to her landlord that she would be able to catch up with payments in the coming days,” adds Riley.
“Responsible landlords will follow due process if there is a genuine need to evict a tenant, but this was not one of those cases.”
Picture credits: Cherwell council.
View Full Article: Landlord given suspended prison sentence after appalling illegal eviction
All regions see rental yields go up
All regions have seen an annual and quarterly rise in rental yields – up from 6% a year ago, and 6.4% in the last quarter of 2022 to 6.5% now, research reveals.
According to Fleet Mortgages, the growth in yields is down to a shortage of rental stock and high tenant demand.
View Full Article: All regions see rental yields go up
Categories
- Landlords (19)
- Real Estate (9)
- Renewables & Green Issues (1)
- Rental Property Investment (1)
- Tenants (21)
- Uncategorized (11,864)
Archives
- November 2024 (55)
- October 2024 (82)
- September 2024 (69)
- August 2024 (55)
- July 2024 (64)
- June 2024 (54)
- May 2024 (73)
- April 2024 (59)
- March 2024 (49)
- February 2024 (57)
- January 2024 (58)
- December 2023 (56)
- November 2023 (59)
- October 2023 (67)
- September 2023 (136)
- August 2023 (131)
- July 2023 (129)
- June 2023 (128)
- May 2023 (140)
- April 2023 (121)
- March 2023 (168)
- February 2023 (155)
- January 2023 (152)
- December 2022 (136)
- November 2022 (158)
- October 2022 (146)
- September 2022 (148)
- August 2022 (169)
- July 2022 (124)
- June 2022 (124)
- May 2022 (130)
- April 2022 (116)
- March 2022 (155)
- February 2022 (124)
- January 2022 (120)
- December 2021 (117)
- November 2021 (139)
- October 2021 (130)
- September 2021 (138)
- August 2021 (110)
- July 2021 (110)
- June 2021 (60)
- May 2021 (127)
- April 2021 (122)
- March 2021 (156)
- February 2021 (154)
- January 2021 (133)
- December 2020 (126)
- November 2020 (159)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (181)
- August 2020 (147)
- July 2020 (172)
- June 2020 (158)
- May 2020 (177)
- April 2020 (188)
- March 2020 (234)
- February 2020 (212)
- January 2020 (164)
- December 2019 (107)
- November 2019 (131)
- October 2019 (145)
- September 2019 (123)
- August 2019 (112)
- July 2019 (93)
- June 2019 (82)
- May 2019 (94)
- April 2019 (88)
- March 2019 (78)
- February 2019 (77)
- January 2019 (71)
- December 2018 (37)
- November 2018 (85)
- October 2018 (108)
- September 2018 (110)
- August 2018 (135)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (118)
- May 2018 (113)
- April 2018 (64)
- March 2018 (96)
- February 2018 (82)
- January 2018 (92)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (100)
- October 2017 (105)
- September 2017 (97)
- August 2017 (101)
- July 2017 (104)
- June 2017 (155)
- May 2017 (135)
- April 2017 (113)
- March 2017 (138)
- February 2017 (150)
- January 2017 (127)
- December 2016 (90)
- November 2016 (135)
- October 2016 (149)
- September 2016 (135)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (52)
- June 2016 (54)
- May 2016 (52)
- April 2016 (24)
- October 2014 (8)
- April 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (3)
Calendar
Recent Posts
- Why Southwark Council’s Attack on Letting Agents Is Misguided
- Why the Buy-to-Let Dream is Dead: How the Government Killed the UK’s Best Investment
- NRLA blast Housing Minister’s court system remarks
- Why Do You Really Want to Invest in Property?
- Demand for accessible rental homes surges – LRG