LATEST: Manchester reveals more details of its selective licensing expansion

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Manchester aims to double the size of its selective licensing scheme by adding another 1,884 properties in eight areas.

The council has given it the go-ahead to the proposals revealed last year and will now launch a consultation into licensing all private homes in Moss Side: Claremont Road/Great Western St, Levenshulme: Matthews Lane, Longsight: The Royals, Cheetham – Esmond/Avondale, Cheetham: Heywood St/Cheetham Hill Road, Rusholme: Birch Lane, Rusholme: Laindon/Dickenson and Cheetham: flats over shops: Cheetham Hill Road.

It points to the success of its first scheme in Crumpsall which recently ended, where 372 properties were licensed and landlords were fined £36,000 for housing offences.

During inspections, 18% of properties were found to have serious hazards, it served 20 improvement notices, two prohibition notices and two suspended prohibition notices.

Spring 2023 start

There are currently seven live selective licensing areas in the city. If the new areas are approved, landlords there would have to pay for a licence in spring 2023. 

Councillor Gavin White (pictured), executive member for housing and development, says there’s clear evidence from the first scheme in Crumpsall that serious issues have been found.

He adds: “There is no place for rogue landlords in our city – we want those landlords to know that this is unacceptable and we will do everything in our power to bring them to account. These eight new schemes across the city will help us to achieve that.” 

Selective licensing currently covers Moss Side, Moston, Old Moat, The Ladders – Gorton and Abbey Hey, Hyde Road – Gorton and Abbey Hey, Trinity, and Ben Street area – Clayton and Openshaw.

View Full Article: LATEST: Manchester reveals more details of its selective licensing expansion

Students are no ‘Young Ones’ say the landlords happy to deduct for clean-up

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Student renters may be messy but are worth the risk, according to the results of a new survey which dispels some myths around the sector.

A Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS) poll of agents and landlords found that 88% have had to raise a deposit deduction at the end of a tenancy. Of those, 48% claimed for damage to property, 36% made a claim for cleaning, 9% deducted for redecoration and 7% experienced rent arrears. However, despite the high percentage of deductions, 60% of those quizzed believed that in general, students took good care of their rental property and 86% would continue to let to students in the future.

Constant redecorating

Of those who did not rent to students, reasons given included: the risk of too much potential damage, potentially causing a problem with neighbours, preference for more reliable professionals in their property, worried about constant redecorating, a belief that students tend to be unclean and irresponsible, hold too many late-night parties and cause elements of anti-social behaviour.

Sandy Bastin, TDS head of adjudication services, says the common concerns about renting to students are valid to some extent, with cleaning topping the deposit deduction claims, but adds that its survey found no antisocial reasons for disputes, no issues with neighbours, and only a small percentage of redecoration claims.

Mid-tenancy inspections

“Positively, our poll observed that over three-quarters of landlords and agents perform mid-tenancy inspections,” she says. “TDS encourages property professionals to conduct regular inspections and include them within your tenancy agreement. Similarly, over half of agents and landlords polled confirmed that they attended the check-in/check-out with the tenants present.”

TDS advises that detailed inventories and check-in/check-out reports are vital to managing the property, navigating a successful end of tenancy and avoiding the chance of deposit disputes.

View Full Article: Students are no ‘Young Ones’ say the landlords happy to deduct for clean-up

Landlord’s heartfelt defence fails to avert £21,000 RRO

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Seven tenants have won a huge Rent Repayment Order after their landlord failed to licence a four-bedroom HMO, claiming he had received poor advice from his managing agent.

Jacob Cik, father of eight children – two of them disabled – needed more living space so signed a tenancy on the house at 23 Sach Road in Hackney with Goldpearl Estates Ltd. However, family circumstances meant he was unable to move in so had to sublet the property, a First Tier Property Tribunal heard.

Three signatures

He claimed managing agents City Homes told him that a group of solicitors renting a property was effectively one household and not an HMO. Cik did not realise there were three signatures on the agreement and also claimed deposit protection, gas safety fire assessment and electrical tests were the agent’s responsibility.

The tenants claimed there were only two smoke alarms in the property which had no fire doors, fire safety devices or emergency lighting. There were also no safety documents or managing agent’s details. They told the tribunal that in July 2020 a separate basement flat was created without any extra fire safety measures being put in place or fire risk assessments. They added that the landlord’s agents advertised the property as four-bedrooms but asked that only three tenants were named on the tenancy. The HMO was unlicensed from April 2020 to April 2021.

Full responsibility

The court ruled that it appeared Cik had “unwittingly lumbered himself” with responsibility for obtaining an HMO licence and failed to do this. “In effect he handed over full responsibility to his agents for management of the premises. In doing so he must accept responsibility for the actions of those agents.”

It made a 20% deduction to the RRO and ordered Cik to pay the tenants £21,600, adding: “The situation is such that one must hope that the other respondents will bear part of the load once an award is made.”

View Full Article: Landlord’s heartfelt defence fails to avert £21,000 RRO

Leaseholders now protected from unfair safety costs

admin    Uncategorized     agents

Many leaseholders will for the first time be legally protected from unfair bills to make their homes safe as measures in the Building Safety Act 2022 come into force on 28 June 2022.

Those responsible for historical safety defects

View Full Article: Leaseholders now protected from unfair safety costs

Can I increase rent while waiting for a S21 eviction?

admin    Uncategorized     agents

We are using Section 21 to evict a tenant because the freeholder is legitimately complaining about overcrowding and noise (birth of two children in a one-bedroomed flat post moving in).

However, the rent has always been paid, albeit at a lower than the market level.

View Full Article: Can I increase rent while waiting for a S21 eviction?